ABSTRACT
Abstract Introduction: Assessment of the results of treatment for mental disorders becomes more complete when the patient's perspective is incorporated. Here, we aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties and application of the Perceived Change Scale - Patient version (PCS-P) in a sample of inpatients with mental disorders. Methods: One hundred and ninety-one psychiatric inpatients answered the PCS-P and the Patients' Satisfaction with Mental Health Services Scale (SATIS) and were evaluated in terms of clinical and sociodemographic data. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed and internal consistency was calculated. The clinical impressions of the patient, family, and physician were correlated with the patient's perception of change. Results: The EFA indicated a psychometrically suitable four-factor solution. The PCS-P exhibited a coherent relationship with SATIS and had a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.856. No correlations were found between the physician's clinical global impression of improvement and the patient's perception of change, although a moderate positive correlation was found between the patients' clinical global impression of improvement and the change perceived by the patient. Conclusions: The PCS-P exhibited adequate psychometric proprieties in a sample of inpatients with mental disorders. The patient's perception of change is an important dimension for evaluation of outcomes in the treatment of mental disorders and differs from the physician's clinical impression of improvement. Evaluation of positive and negative perceptions of the various dimensions of the patient's life enables more precise consideration of the patient's priorities and interests.
Resumo Introdução: A avaliação dos resultados do tratamento para transtornos mentais torna-se mais completa quando a perspectiva do paciente é incluída. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar as propriedades psicométricas e a aplicação da Escala de Mudança Percebida - Versão do Paciente (EMP-P) em uma amostra de pacientes internados com transtornos mentais. Métodos: Um total de 191 pacientes psiquiátricos internados responderam a EMP-P e a Escala de Avaliação da Satisfação dos Usuários com os Serviços de Saúde Mental (SATIS), além de serem avaliados quanto a dados clínicos e sociodemográficos. Foi realizada análise fatorial exploratória (AFE) e calculada a consistência interna. As impressões clínicas do paciente, da família e do médico foram correlacionadas com a mudança percebida pelo paciente. Resultados: A AFE indicou uma solução de quatro fatores psicometricamente adequada. A EMP-P apresentou uma relação coerente com a SATIS e um alfa de Cronbach de 0,856. Não foi encontrada correlação entre impressão clínica global de melhora pelo médico e mudança percebida pelo paciente, embora uma correlação positiva moderada tenha sido observada entre impressão clínica global de melhora pelo paciente e mudança percebida pelo paciente. Conclusão: A EMP-P exibiu propriedades psicométricas adequadas em uma amostra de pacientes com transtornos mentais internados. A percepção de mudança pelo paciente é uma importante dimensão para a avaliação de resultados no tratamento de transtornos mentais e difere da impressão clínica de melhora do médico. A avaliação das percepções positivas e negativas das diversas dimensões da vida dos pacientes permite uma análise mais precisa de suas prioridades e interesses.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Perception , Physicians/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Patient Satisfaction , Inpatients/psychology , Mental Disorders/psychology , Psychometrics , Socioeconomic Factors , Translating , Cross-Sectional Studies , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Health ServicesABSTRACT
Background General Hospital Psychiatric Units have a fundamental importance in the mental health care systems. However, there is a lack of studies regarding the level of improvement of patients in this type of facility. Objective To assess factors related to good and poor outcomes in psychiatric inpatients using an index composed by clinical parameters easily measured. Methods Length of stay (LOS), Global Assessment of Functioning (variation and at discharge) and Clinical Global Impression (severity and improvement) were used to build a ten-point improvement index (I-Index). Records of psychiatric inpatients of a general hospital during an 18-month period were analyzed. Three groups (poor, intermediate and good outcomes) were compared by univariate and multivariate models according to clinical and sociodemographic variables. Results Two hundred and fifty patients were included, with a percentage in the groups with poor, regular and good outcomes of 16.4%, 59,6% and 24.0% respectively. Poor outcome at the discharge was associated mainly with lower education, transient disability, antipsychotics use, chief complaint behavioral change/aggressiveness and psychotic features. Multivariate analysis found a higher OR for diagnoses of psychotic disorders and personality disorders and others variables in relation to protective categories in the poor outcome group compared to the good outcome group. Discussion Our I-Index proved to be an indicator of that allows an easy and more comprehensive evaluation to assess outcomes of inpatients than just LOS. Different interventions addressed to conditions such as psychotic disorders and disruptive chief complaints are necessary.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Hospitals, Psychiatric , Length of Stay , Mental Disorders/diagnosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Skin Biopsy is a equently used diagnostic tool in dermatology and clinical impressions before biopsy may be different with pathologic diagnosis. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the concordance rate of clinical impression and pathologic diagnosis. METHODS: Clinical and Pathological studies were done on 559 biopsied skin diseases among 16, 944 out-patients in Dermatologic department of Chungnam University Hospital during the period of 1 year from March, 2002 to February, 2003. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The study results are summarized as follows: 1. The most frequently biopsied skin disease group was non-tumor, noninfectious disease (40.8%), followed by benign tumor (37.4%), infectious disease (11.8%), malignant tumor (10.0%). 2. The concordance rate between clinical impression and pathologic diagnosis showed 68.9% in complete agreement and 79.6% in complete and partial agreement. 3. The concordance rate of professor committed cases was 68.8% and that of residents committed cases was 69.1%. 4. The concordance rates among disease groups were highest in malignant tumor (74.6%), then benign tumor (70.8%), non-tumor infectious disease (67.4%) and non-tumor noninfectious disease (65.2%).