ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the effect of group cognitive behavior intervention on self-rated health of middle school students with emotional disorders. Methods From January 2018 to June 2018,79 middle school students with emotional disorders were randomly divided into intervention group ( 41 cases) and control group (38 cases) according to the single or double number of medical records. The control group only received drug treatment,while the intervention group received group cognitive behavior intervention on the basis of drug treatment. All the students in the two groups completed the self-rated health measurement scale before intervention (T0),after intervention (T1) and 8 weeks after intervention (T2). Results (1) There were no significant differences in total health score and dimension score between the two groups before intervention (both P<0. 05). (2)The repeated measurement variance analysis showed that there was a signif-icant group × time interaction effect on total health score and dimensions(P>0. 05). (3) The group effect of physical health was not significant (P>0. 05). The group effect of total mental health, social health and health score at T1 and T2 time points were significant (all P>0. 05). (4)Compared with before intervention, mental health ((123. 34±9. 33),( 122. 63± 9. 11)),social health ((102. 89 ± 7. 28),( 101. 89± 7. 73)) and total health score ((370. 34±17. 99),(367. 63±17. 89)) of intervention group at T1 and T2 increased ( all P<0. 05),while that of control group increased only at T1 (all P<0. 05). Conclusion Group cognitive behavioral intervention has no obvious effect on physical health of middle school students with emotional dis-orders. And group cognitive behavioral intervention can effectively improve their mental health,social health and overall health level,and the long-term effect is better.
ABSTRACT
Objective To observe the influence of nutrition cognition and behavior intervention of family caregivers on nutritional status of gastric cancer patients during chemotherapy. Methods We selected 100 patients who received complete chemotherapy at the Department of gastrointestinal surgery from September 2015 to February 2017.Each patient selected 1 family caregiver.It was divided into the control group and the intervention group by the draw method.The control group carried out routine nursing measures.The intervention group carried out nutritional cognitive behavior intervention.The effects of cognitive behavior intervention were investigated by observing the scores of PG-SGA,albumin, prealbumin in gastric cancer patients and the scores of nutrition knowledge,attitude and practice in family caregivers. Results The scores of nutrition knowledge, attitude and practice of the control group and the intervention group were respectively 44.17 ± 9.35 and 46.50 ± 9.32, and the difference was statistically significant(t=15.02, P<0.05).There was significant difference in PG-SGA score, hemoglobin and BMI in patients with gastric cancer patients (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of malnutrition and prealbumin in patients with gastric cancer patients (P>0.05). Conclusion Nutrition cognition and behavior intervention can effectively improve the nutritional cognition of family caregivers, improve the nutritional status of gastric cancer patients during chemotherapy, and promote the rehabilitation of patients with gastric cancer and improve their quality of life.
ABSTRACT
Objective To study the effect of cognitive-behavior intervention on illness uncertainty and coping style in patients with endometriosis (EMs). Methods 80 EMs patients admitted into our inpatient department of hospital from January 2015 to October 2016 were selected as research object. According to random number table, patients were divided into control group (40 cases) which took routine nursing intervention;and experimental group (40 cases) which took cognitive-behavior intervention on the basis of control group. The illness uncertainty, scores of coping style of two groups after intervention were compared. Results There was no statistical difference in the illness uncertainty between the two groups before intervention ; After intervention, the scores of uncertainty, complexity, unpredictability, poor information of two groups were lower than before intervention (P<0.05); After intervention, the scores of uncertainty, complexity, unpredictability, poor information of experimental group were lower than control group (P<0.05); There was no statistical difference in the scores of coping style between the two groups before intervention; After intervention, the scores of confront, optimism, seeking support of two groups were higher than before intervention, and escape scores were lower than before intervention (P<0.05); After intervention, the scores of confront, optimism, seeking support of experimental group were higher than control group, and escape score was lower than control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Cognitive-behavior intervention for EMs patients can effectively decrease illness uncertainty, reduce negative emotion and improve coping capacity.
ABSTRACT
Objective To study the effect of cognitive-behavior intervention on illness uncertainty and coping style in patients with endometriosis (EMs). Methods 80 EMs patients admitted into our inpatient department of hospital from January 2015 to October 2016 were selected as research object. According to random number table, patients were divided into control group (40 cases) which took routine nursing intervention;and experimental group (40 cases) which took cognitive-behavior intervention on the basis of control group. The illness uncertainty, scores of coping style of two groups after intervention were compared. Results There was no statistical difference in the illness uncertainty between the two groups before intervention ; After intervention, the scores of uncertainty, complexity, unpredictability, poor information of two groups were lower than before intervention (P<0.05); After intervention, the scores of uncertainty, complexity, unpredictability, poor information of experimental group were lower than control group (P<0.05); There was no statistical difference in the scores of coping style between the two groups before intervention; After intervention, the scores of confront, optimism, seeking support of two groups were higher than before intervention, and escape scores were lower than before intervention (P<0.05); After intervention, the scores of confront, optimism, seeking support of experimental group were higher than control group, and escape score was lower than control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Cognitive-behavior intervention for EMs patients can effectively decrease illness uncertainty, reduce negative emotion and improve coping capacity.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the influence of cognitive behavioral intervention on self efficacy and quality of life in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).Methods 90 patients with chronic hepatitis B were randomly divided into cognitive behavioral intervention group and control group,45 cases in each group.The patients of the control group were treated with routine treatment,the intervention group was given cognitive behavior intervention on the basis of conventional treatment.The general self efficacy scale (GSEs) and SF-36 quantity form (SF-36) were used to evaluate the effects of intervention.Results Before the intervention,the GSES score and SF-36 scores of each dimension of the two groups had no statistically significant differences (all P ＞ 0.05).After intervention,the GSES scores of the intervention group was (22.53 ± 4.12) points,which was significantly higher than (17.82 ± 4.51)points of the control group,there was significant difference between the two groups (t =4.918,P ＜0.01).The dimensions of the intervention group SF-36 score[comprehensive health status (16.13 ± 2.04)points and physical function (17.73 ± 3.49) points,mental health (15.73 ± 2.69) points,role limitations (18.38 ± 2.78) points,social function (14.76 ± 2.96) points,physiological (15.89 ± 2.85) points,vitality and energy (19.18 ± 3.43) points,body pain (19.84 ± 3.78) points] were significantly increased,and compared with the control group [general health status (12.62 ± 2.15) points and physical function (13.18 ± 2.31) points,mental health (9.24 ± 3.54) points,role limitations (8.67 ± 3.47) points,social function (9.24 ± 2.42) points,physiological (8.67 ± 2.60) points,vitality and energy (10.64 ± 2.73) points,body pain (10.80 ± 2.40) points],the differences were statistically significant (t=6.896,8.863,9.189,17.309,9.287,12.046,11.645,14.937,all P＜0.05).Conclusion Cognitive behavioral intervention can significantly enhance the self-efficacy of patients with hepatitis B,and improve the quality of life of patients,it can be popularized in clinical work.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the effect of cognitive behavior intervention on the defense style of patients with depression. Methods One hundred and forty-six patients with depression in hospitalized were divided into study group and control group according to the set sequence. The study group and the control group were given cognitive behavioral intervention and routine nursing, respectively. All patients were assessed by Hamilton depression scale (HAMD), Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA), Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ), and Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ) . Results The differences of conceal type and positive coping factor were significantly before and after intervention in the study group ( < 0.05) . In the 6th week, the differences of conceal type and positive coping factor were significantly between the two groups ( < 0.05) . The differences of HAMD and HAMA scores were significantly between the 0 th and 6 th weeks of the two groups ( <0.05) . There was negatively correlated between HAMD and positive coping factor ( <0.05) . There were positively correlated between HAMD and the cover up defense mode ( <0.05),HAMA and the cover up defense mode ( <0.05) . Conclusion The cognitive behavior intervention could improve the depression and anxiety symptoms and defense style in patients with depression.
ABSTRACT
Objective Using the evidence-based medicine to investigate the effect of cognitive behavior intervention on physical and mental health in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Methods Controlled studies related to psychological intervention on depression and glyeosylated hemoglobin in patients with type 2 diabetes were retrieved from electronic databases such as CNKI,VIP,Wanfang database and Pubmed,etc.The quality of included studies was evaluated and then data were analyzed by using RevMan5 software.Results A total of 273 articles were retrieved and finally 6 were enrolled.Results of Meta analysis were listed as follows:Cognitive behavior intervention could reduce score of Self-rated Depression Scale (SDS) in patients with diabetes mellitus.Cognitive behavior intervention could effectively reduce glycosylated hemoglobin values in patients with diabetes mellitus.Conclusions Cognitive behavior intervention can improve physical and mental health,decrease glycosylated hemoglobin and improve depression status in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.However,all the trials included in this review are of low quality; larger scale RCTs of higher quality are needed to confirm this conclusion.
ABSTRACT
In modern society, stress is one of the most significant problems affecting physical as well as mental health. Stress, which is defined as a situation in which the homeostasis of the physiological system of one's mind and body is threatened, is composed of two concepts: stressors and stress reactions. A stressor is the stimulus that is perceived as a threat and arouses a stress reaction, such as a disaster or serious life event. Stress reactions are physical and mental symptoms, for example, chest tightness, dizziness, abdominal pain, dyspepsia, headache, and agitation, which are mediated by the sympathetic nervous system and stress hormones such as cortisol. These reactions, along with stress-related unhealthy behaviors, result in serious chronic diseases, including cancers and cardiovascular disease. Stress coping methods are classified into two components: cognitive behavioral interventions for stressors and mind-body interventions to reduce the stress response. Various interventions have been identified: progressive muscle relaxation, autogenic training, relaxation response, biofeedback, the emotional freedom technique, guided imagery, diaphragmatic breathing, transcendental meditation, and mindfulness-based stress reduction. Meditation and progressive muscular relaxation are well-known and widely used procedures to reduce the stress response and to improve quality of life. Further studies to establish an evidence-based standardized program that can be easily applied at the individual level are needed.