Application value of cruciform anastomosis in the laparoscopic radical resection of colon cancer / 中华消化外科杂志

Objective To evaluate the safety and feasibility of cruciform anastomosis in the laparoscopic radical resection of colon cancer.Methods The retrospective descriptive study was adopted.The clinicopathologic data of 9 patients with colon cancer who were admitted to the Shanxi Provincial Caner Hospital between December 2011 to October 2013 were collected.After the laparoscopic free colon and dissection of lymph nodes,the proximal and distal ends of the colon tumor were cut off using an ENDO-GIA,cutting one small incision on the both side of stump,and ENDO-GIA was put into the incision to staple the mesentery of colonic wall,finally,the beak-like common incision was closed by ENDO-GIA and digestive tract construction was conducted.Observation indices:(1)operative indices:operation time,time of cruciform colon anastomosis,volume of intraoperative blood loss,conversion to open surgery.(2)Tumor indices:number of lymph nodes dissected,distance to resection margin,R resection.(3)Surgical complications:anastomotic stoma incompetence,anastomotic leakage,anastomotic stenosis,twisting of bowel,wound liquefaction infection.(4)Postoperative recovery time:time for initial out-of-bed activity,time to anal exsufflation,time for fluid diet intake,duration of postoperative hospital stay.(5)Follow-up situations:follow-up using outpatient examination was conducted up to April 2014.Karnofsky performance status(KPS)score was used to evaluate the health conditions and tumor recurrence of anastomotic stoma and colonic cavity stenosis were detected by fibercoloscope.Measurement data with normal distribution were presented as x±s.Results(1)Operative indices:9 patients received successful total laparoscopic resection of colon cancer+D3 lymph node dissection+cruciform anastomosis,without conversion to open surgery.Operation time,time of cruciform colon anastomosis and volume of intraoperative blood loss were respectively(140±50)minutes,(43±26)minutes and(62±56)mL.(2)Tumor indices:the number of lymph nodes dissected was 17±6 percase.The distance to resection margin was more than 8 cm,and pathological findings showed no residual cancer.(3)Surgical complications:9 patients had no postoperative complications.(4)Postoperative recovery time:time for initial out-of-bed activity,time to anal exsufflation,time for fluid diet intake and duration of hospital stay were respectively(1.8±0.9)days,(2.4±1.2)days,(3.6±1.7)days and(9.6±2.5)days.All the patients were discharged from hospital at postoperative day 12,without the occurrence of readmission within postoperative day 30.(5)Follow-up situations:all the patients were followed up by outpatient examination at postoperative month 6,with KPS score≥90 and without the occurrence of tumor recurrence of anastomotic stoma and colonic cavity stenosis.Conclusion Cruciform anastomosis in the laparoscopic radical resection of colon cancer is safe and feasible.

Procedimiento de Hartmann vs resección y anastomosis primaria en peritonitis diverticular de colon izquierdo por cirugía abierta: revisión sistemática de la literatura / Hartmann’s procedure and resection with primary anastomosis in diverticular peritonitis

Introduction: colonic diverticulosis, as diverticulitis, is a frequent disease in different stages of evolution. There is uncertainty about treatment options that are used in secondary peritonitis. The aim of this study is to determine the best treatment option for patients with peritonitis secondary to diverticulitis of the left colon in terms of postoperative morbidity (POM) and mortality, comparing Hartmann's procedure (HP) and resection with primary anastomosis (RPA). Material and Methods: systematic review. Studies in adults with peritonitis secondary to diverticulitis of the left colon treated with HP and RPA published between 1990 and 2011 were analyzed. TRIPDATABSE, IWO, MEDLINE, SciELO and LILACS databases were consulted and search strategies were applied using MeSH and free terms. Selected studies were analyzed using a score of methodological quality (MQ). The following variables were considered: mortality, POM, hospital stay, percentage of bowel transit reconstitution in patients undergoing HP and MQ of primary studies. Results: 26 primary studies were analyzed (47 series). There were no significant differences in the variable mortality (p = 0.0805), but significant difference was observed in POM (incompletely reported) (p = 0.0187). The median of MQ of the studies was 11 points for HP series and 10 for RPA series. Conclusion: the available evidence to determine the best treatment option in terms of mortality and POM in this kind of patients is insufficient. Studies with better level evidence and MQ are needed to clarify the uncertain.

Introducción: la enfermedad diverticular del colon es una entidad frecuente, como también la diverticulitis en sus diferentes estadios de evolución. Existe incertidumbre respecto de las opciones terapéuticas que se utilizan en el tratamiento de la peritonitis diverticular de colon izquierdo (PDCI). El objetivo de este estudio es determinar la mejor opción de tratamiento para pacientes con PDCI entre procedimiento de Hart-mann (PH) y resección con anastomosis primaria (RAP), en términos de mortalidad y morbilidad postoperatoria (MPO). Material y Método: revisión sistemática de la literatura. Se analizaron estudios realizados en adultos con PDCI tratados con PH y RAP, publicados entre 1990 y 2011. Se consultó en las bases de datos TRIPDATABSE, IWO, MEDLINE, SciELO y LILACS, utilizando estrategias de búsqueda con términos MeSH, palabras libres y operadores booleanos. Los estudios seleccionados fueron analizados mediante un escore de calidad metodológica (CM). Se consideraron las variables mortalidad, MPO, estadía hospitalaria, porcentaje de reconstitución de tránsito en pacientes sometidos a PH y CM de los estudios primarios. Resultados: se analizaron 26 estudios primarios (47 series de pacientes). No se encontraron diferencias significativas respecto de la variable mortalidad (p = 0,0805); pero sí en la variable MPO, reportada de forma incompleta (p = 0,0187). La mediana de la CM de los estudios primarios fue de 11 puntos para las series de PH y de 10 para las de RAP. Conclusión: la evidencia disponible no permite determinar la mejor alternativa terapéutica en términos de mortalidad y MPO en este tipo de pacientes. Se requieren estudios de mejor nivel de evidencia y CM para aclarar esta incertidumbre.

The Necessity for Mechanical Bowel Preparation before Colonic Resection and Primary Anastomosis

BACKGROUND: The results of recent reports suggest that mechanical bowel preparation before colonic resection and primary anastomosis may be unnecessary. To determine whether mechanical bowel preparation influences the incidence of postoperative complications following colorectal surgery, the records of patients who had undergone colonic or rectal resection were retrospectively reviewed. METHODS: Between March 1992 and October 1997, colonic resection and primary anastomosis without colostomy was performed on 56 patients. Among these, 27 patients had undergone mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) before surgery, and 29 patients had not. We compared the data from both groups with respect to wound infection, anastomotic leak, intra-abdominal sepsis and death. RESULTS: The postoperative complication and mortality rates were similar in the two groups. Wound infection occurred in seven patients (four with MBP, three without), and the incidence of wound infection was similar in the two groups (14.8% versus 10.3%, P=0.700). Wound disruption occurred in two patients (one with MBP, one without). Anastomotic leaks occurred in two patients who had undergone bowel preparation. The overall anastomotic leak rate was 3.6% (7.4% versus 0%), but the incidence of anastomotic leaks was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.228). No intra-abdominal sepsis was clinically apparent in either group. There was one death, a patient who had undergone bowel preparation. The mortality rate was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.482). CONCLUSIONS: We believe that mechanical bowel preparation before colonic resection and primary anastomosis may be unnecessary, so routine MBP should be further scrutinized.

Anatomical Variations of the Right Colic Artery

A through knowledge of the anatomy of colonic mesenteric arteries is necessary to accomplish successful, uncomplicated abdominal operations, especially laparoscopic colonic resections in which the mesenteric vessels can't be palpated. Such knowledge is also important when performing a colonic resection for cancer using proximal vascular ligation and wide en bloc resection. Most surgical textbooks depict a "normal pattern" of arterial supply to the right colon as consisting of three arterial branches (the ileocolic, the right colic, and the middle colic arteries) arising independently from the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). Based on the literature, there are only two colonic arteries arising independently from the SMA in many cases. We examined the anatomy of these arteries in 50 patients who had had SMA angiographies for various diseases from January 1995 to May 1997. In all of our cases, the ileocolic artery and the middle colicartery emanated directly from the SMA, but the right colic artery originated directly from the SMA in only 54% of the cases. The right colic artery was absent in 8% of the cases. It also arose as a single trunk with the middle colic artery (22% of the cases) and from the ileocolic artery (16% of the cases). Our data, together with published anatomic studies, lead us to conclude that in many cases there are only two independent branches arising from the SMA that supply the large intestine, the ileocolic artery and the middle colic artery. This knowledge may be helpful in laparoscopic colon surgery, radical colon resections for cancer, and colon replacements after operations on the esophagus or the urinary bladder.