ABSTRACT
Set up: One Tuberculosis Unit (TU) in Tiruvallur district, Tamil Nadu, where Tuberculosis (TB) patients treated under Directly Observed Treatment Short Course (DOTS) programme. Objective: To assess the reliability and accountability of Government health workers and community volunteers as DOT Providers (DPs) and to assess treatment outcome and problems encountered by patients managed by different DPs and the acceptability of community providers in the RNTCP. Methods: The 189 DPs in the study area during the first and second quarters of 2005 and 303 patients who were treated by these DPs were interviewed. Univariate analyses were used to identify the factors influencing the success rate. Results: Of 303 patients treated, the success rates of the patients treated by Government DOT providers (GDP) and community DOT providers (CDP) were 85.3% (209/245) and 86.2% (50/58) respectively. The difference in the success rates by GDP and CDP was not statistically significant. Among the 259 patients who successfully completed treatment, 82% (172/209) under GDP and 84% (42/50) under CDP were regular for treatment and there was no association between the type of DOT providers and regularity of treatment. Conclusion: Community volunteers could be inducted as DPs into the DOTS strategy for efficient supervision and management of the patients.