ABSTRACT
Methods:The clinical data and follow-up results of 56 patients with refractory hyperthyroidism who underwent laparoscopy or open surgery in Affiliated Nanhua Hospital of University of South China from January 2019 to August 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.Results:Among the 56 patients, there were 6 men and 50 women. Thirty-six (64.3%) patients underwent endoscopic surgery and twenty (35.7%) patients underwent open surgery. The operation time was (132.0 ± 32.0) minutes. Intraoperative blood loss was (32.4 ± 27.8) mL. Postoperative parathyroid hormone level was (27.8 ± 18.3) ng/L. Forty-nine (87.5%) patients showed benign pathology results after surgery. After surgery, 14 (25.0%) patients had hypothyroidism, including 7 (12.5%) patients with hyperthyroidism combined with thyroid cancer. There were no patients with permanent hypothyroidism or recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis. All patients had a good prognosis and satisfactory surgical results.Conclusion:With the update of preoperative preparation methods for hyperthyroidism, the increasing maturity of thyroid surgery technology, and the use of new energy instruments and technologies, surgical treatment is undoubtedly a good treatment method for patients with refractory hyperthyroidism or a suspected malignant tumor.Objevtives:To investigate the indications and clinical efficacy of surgical treatment in patients with refractory hyperthyroidism.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the analgesic effect and safety of using an epidural analgesia pump versus an intravenous analgesia pump for uterine artery embolization in the treatment of uterine fibroids. Methods:Fifty patients with uterine fibroids undergoing uterine artery embolization admitted to The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from January 2019 to December 2021 were included in this study. They were divided into an observation group and a control group ( n = 25/group). Patients in the observation group used an epidural analgesia pump for pain relief, while patients in the control group used an intravenous analgesia pump for pain relief. At 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery, pain severity was compared between the two groups using the Visual Analogue Scale. Comfort level was compared between the two groups using the Bruggemann Comfort scale. Before and after surgery, respiratory rate, heart rate, blood pressure, and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results:At 1 hour after surgery, the Visual Analogue Scale score in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group [3.00 (2.00, 5.50) vs. 7.00 (6.00, 8.00), Z = -3.84, P < 0.05]. At 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery, there was a significant difference in the Visual Analogue Scale score between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Within 24 hours after surgery, the use of opioid analgesics in the observation group was less than that in the control group [16.00% (4/25) vs. 88.00% (22/25), χ2 = 25.96, P < 0.001]. At 1 hour after surgery, the Bruggemann Comfort Scale score in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group [0.00 (0.00, 0.50) vs. 0.00 (0.00, 0.00), Z = 2.08, P < 0.05]. At 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery, there was no significant difference in the Bruggemann Comfort Scale score between the two groups (all P > 0.05). After surgery, heart rate was significantly decreased in each group compared with before surgery (both P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in respiratory rate and mean arterial pressure between the two groups before and after surgery (both P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidences of postoperative nausea, vomiting, and fever between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Conclusion:The epidural analgesia pump used for uterine artery embolization in the treatment of uterine fibroids has a better analgesic effect and provides more comfort and is safer than the intravenous analgesia pump. The former is worthy of clinical promotion.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the effects of modified incision drainage combined with thread-drawing and precise minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of anal fistula on anal defecation function and complications.Methods:A total of 105 patients with anal fistula who were diagnosed and treated in Xin′an International Hospital from December 2018 to December 2020 were collected. The patients were divided into the observation group (58 cases) and the control group (47 cases) according to surgical methods. The observation group received modified incision drainage combined with thread-drawing surgery. The control group received precise minimally invasive anal fistula surgery. The treatment outcome, anal defecation function and complications were compared between the two groups.Results:The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, first defecation time after operation, normal eating time after operation in the two groups had no significant differences ( P>0.05). The hospital stay in the observation group was significantly longer than that in the control group: (5.29 ± 1.53) d vs. (4.02 ± 1.16) d, there was statistical differences ( P<0.05). After operation, the resting pressure of the anal canal, resting rectal pressure, length of the tube high pressure belt, the maximum systolic pressure of the anal canal between the two groups had no significant differences ( P>0.05). The excellent and good rate of anal defecation function and complication rate between the two groups had no significant differences ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Modified incision drainage combined with thread-hanging surgery in the treatment of anal fistula is equivalent with precision minimally invasive surgery. Both can effectively improve the anal defecation function. The postoperative safety is good and there is no recurrence. However, the hospital stay of patients with precision minimally invasive surgery for anal fistula is relatively shorter.