ABSTRACT
Objective To observe the distribution and variation of right colonic vessels,and investigate the clinical value of computed tomography angiography (CTA),computed tomography colonography (CTC) and image fusion technology in preoperative evaluation of laparoscopic right colonic cancer (RCC).Methods The retrospective and descriptive study was conducted.The clinicopathological data of 38 patients who underwent laparoscopic extended radical resection of RCC + D3 lymphadenectomy in the Affiliated Wuxi Second People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between January 2015 and July 2017 were collected.Patients received preoperative plain and enhanced scans of abdominal and pelvic CT.The original images were reconstructed and fused by CTA and CTC,and then coming out with three-dimensional images of blood vessels and gut.Observation indicators:(1) branches of superior mesenteric artery (SMA);(2) positional relationship between SMA and superior mesenteric vein (SMV);(3) composition of gastrocolic venous trunk.Results Scan images of 38 patients had fused with scan images of vessels and primary tumors and reached the diagnostic standard,with a good imaging performance.Distribution of blood vessels of virtual reality (VR) images and were compared with that of naked blood vessels under intraoperative laparoscopy,showing a coincidence rate of 100.0％ (38/38).(1) Branches of SMA:results of CTA and intraoperative anatomy showed that the occurrence rate of the right colonic artery,middle colonic artery and ileocolic artery were respectively 94.7％ (36/38),92.1％ (35/38) and 100.0％ (38/38).A right colonic artery was found in 28 patients.Ten patients had structure variation of right colonic artery,including 3 with 2 right colonic arteries and 2 without right colonic artery.The right colonic artery and middle colonic artery merged into the same trunk and then flowed into SMA were detected in 2 patients;the right colonic artery and ileocolic artery merged into the same trunk and then flowed into SMA were detected in 3 patients.(2) Positional relationship between SMA and SMV:results of CTA and intraoperative anatomy showed that the occurrence rate of both SMA and SMV was 100.0％ (38/38).The SMA in 20 patients was located in the ventral side of SMV;SMA in 18 patients was located in the dorsal side of SMV.(3) Composition of gastrocolic venous trunk:results of CTA and intraoperative anatomy showed that 29 of 38 patients had gastrocolic venous trunks,which belonged to four sources,including right colonic vein,middle colonic vein,fight gastric epiploic vein and anterior superior pancreaticoduodenal vein.Among 29 patients,18 had 2-or 3-branch type of gastrocolic trunk that consisted of the right gastric epiploic vein,middle colonic vein and right colonic vein;3 had 2-branch type of gastric pancreatic trunk that consisted of the right gastric epiploic vein and anterior superior pancreaticoduodenal vein;8 had 3-or 4-branch type of stomach-pancreas-colon trunk that consisted of right gastric epiploic vein,anterior superior pancreaticoduodenal vein,right colonic vein and middle colonic vein.Conclusion CTA,CTC and image fusion technology can intuitively show the anatomy and variation of right colonic vessels,with a high clinical value.
ABSTRACT
Computed tomography colonography (CTC) is a well-established technique for evaluation of colorectal cancer (CRC). Signiifcant advances have been made in the technique of CTC since its inception. Besides being an excellent tool for detection of CRC, it is minimally invasive, less time-consuming and well tolerated by patients. Furthermore, it has fewer complications than conventional colonoscopy (CC) or barium enema (BE). The application of new technologies, such as electronic cleansing (EC) and dual-energy CT (DECT), enriches the examination of CTC. In 2005, a standardized reporting scheme, CT colonography reporting and data system (C-RADS), was put forward by the working group on virtual colonoscopy. They proposed that the report should include lesion size, number, morphology, location, attenuation and recommendations for lesion surveillance. New research progress and clinical applications of CTC in CRC are reviewed in this article. In addition, the paper also brielfy touches upon technique, indications, contraindications, safety and risk of CTC.
ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Mapear a visão dos cirurgiões sobre o papel da colonografia por tomografia computadorizada (CTC). Materiais e Métodos: Envio de questionário eletrônico aos membros do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões. O questionário constou de 16 questões de múltipla escolha que abordaram dados demográficos e conhecimentos gerais sobre a CTC. Resultados: Foram obtidas 144 respostas; 90,3% dos especialistas eram homens, 60% com menos de 30 anos de formado, 77,1% eram gastrocirurgiões, 22,9% eram cirurgiões gerais, 53,5% encontravam-se na vida acadêmica e 59,7% exerciam sua atividade profissional em cidades com mais de 500.000 habitantes. Em relação ao conhecimento da CTC, 84,7% conheciam o método, 70,8% sabiam como é realizado, 56,9% relataram conhecer o preparo intestinal utilizado, 31,3% utilizavam o método e 53,5% conheciam algum serviço de CTC na cidade em que atuam. Cerca de metade dos profissionais não conhecia a precisa indicação do método. Profissionais que atuam em cidades com mais de 500.000 habitantes conhecem e utilizam mais o método (p < 0,005). Houve uma tendência de os profissionais com carreira acadêmica utilizarem mais o método. Conclusão: A CTC, embora ainda pouco utilizada em nosso meio, é bastante conhecida, principalmente em grandes centros urbanos e no ambiente acadêmico. .
Objective: To map the view of surgeons on the role played by computed tomography colonography (CTC). Materials and Methods: An electronic questionnaire was sent to members of the Brazilian College of Surgeons. The questionnaire consisted of 16 multiple-choice questions about demographics and general knowledge about CTC. Results: The authors obtained 144 responses; 90.3% of the specialists were men, 60% with less than 30 years from graduation, 77.1% were gastrointestinal surgeons, 22.9% were general surgeons, 53.5% were involved in academic activity, and 59.7% had their professional activity in cities with more than 500,000 inhabitants. As regards the knowledge about CTC, 84.7% of the respondents knew the method, 70.8% knew how it is performed, 56.9% reported knowing the bowel preparation used for the procedure, 31.3% used the method, and 53.5% knew some CTC service in their city. About half of the respondents did not know the precise indication of the method. The method is most frequently known and used by professionals working in cities with more than 500,000 inhabitants (p < 0.005). There was a tendency of a more frequent use of the method by the professionals pursuing an academic career. Conclusion: Despite its infrequent use in Brazil, CTC is a well known method, particularly in large urban centers and in the academic environment. .
ABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: Avaliar o grau de aceitação do paciente submetido a colonografia por tomografia computadorizada (CTC) em comparação com a colonoscopia, quando realizadas para rastreamento de doença colorretal. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Cinquenta pacientes com suspeita de doença colorretal foram submetidos a CTC e colonoscopia. Questionários foram aplicados antes e após a realização da CTC e após a colonoscopia. Graduou-se o desconforto esperado e experimentado antes e após a realização da CTC e da colonoscopia, bem como a preferência do paciente por exame. RESULTADOS: Em relação à CTC, antes de iniciar o exame 18 por cento dos pacientes afirmaram esperar pouco desconforto, 78 por cento, desconforto moderado e 4 por cento, muito desconforto. Após a realização do exame, 72 por cento dos pacientes relataram pouco desconforto, 26 por cento, desconforto moderado e apenas um (2 por cento) dos pacientes referiu muito desconforto. Após a realização da colonoscopia, 86 por cento dos pacientes relataram preferência pela CTC. O grau de distensão colônica e a quantidade de fluido residual não influenciaram na preferência dos pacientes. CONCLUSÃO: Os pacientes preferiram a CTC à colonoscopia, não havendo relação estatística com o grau de distensão colônica na CTC e a eficiência do preparo intestinal.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the degree of acceptance of patients undergoing computed tomography colonography (CTC) in comparison with colonoscopy in the screening of colorectal disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with suspected colorectal disease underwent CTC and colonoscopy. Questionnaires were administered before and after the performance of the CTC and after the colonoscopy. The discomfort expected and experienced before and after the performance of both procedures as well as the patients' preference for each method were evaluated. RESULTS: As regards CTC, before the procedure, 18 percent of the patients reported expecting little discomfort, 78 percent, mild discomfort, and 4 percent, a lot of discomfort. After the procedure, 72 percent of the patients reported little discomfort, 26 percent, mild discomfort, and only one (2 percent) of the patients reported a lot of discomfort. Upon completion of the colonoscopy, 86 percent of the patients reported their preference for CTC. The degree of colonic distention and residual amount of fluid had no influence on the patients' preference. CONCLUSION: CTC was preferred to colonoscopy, with no statistical relationship with the degree of colonic distention at CTC and efficiency of bowel preparation.