ABSTRACT
Objective To study the trends in surgical treatment and the outcomes of critical acute pancreatitis (CAP).Methods The clinical data of 76 patients with CAP who were treated in the Department of Biliopancreatic Surgery of the Xiangya Hospital,Central South University from January 2010 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed.Data which included demographics,micro-organisms,surgical interventions and mortality were compared between the time periods of 2010 to 2013 and 2014 to 2017.Results Before 2014,19 patients with CAP were treated in the Department of Biliopancreatic Surgery of the Xiangya Hospital,Central South University.The percentage of multidrug resistant organisms (MDRO) in pancreatic drainage was 5.3％ (1/19).In the latter 4 years,57 patients with CAP were treated.The percentage of MDRO was 50.9％ (29/57),which was significandy higher than the initial 4 years (P＜0.001).For surgical treatment,the proportion of minimally invasive surgery in the latter 4 years was significantly higher than that in the initial 4 years.The percentage of percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) increased from 63.2％ in the initial 4 years to 86.0％ in the latter 4 years.The proportion of minimal access retroperitoneal pancreatic necrosectomy (MARPN) increased from zero in the initial 4 years to 59.6％,while the proportion of open pancreatic necrosectomy (OPN) decreased from 68.4％ in the initial 4 years to 24.6％.The mortality rate of patients with CAP dropped from 52.6％ (10/19) in the initial 4 years to 24.6％ (14/57) in the latter four years.Conclusions In the center which specializes in treating pancreatitis,although the problem of bacterial resistance had become increasingly prominent,the mortality rate of CAP had shown a significant downward trend due to the development of various minimally invasive techniques.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the performance of the revision of Atlanta classification (RAC) and determinant-based classification (DBC) in acute pancreatitis. Methods Consecutive patients with acute pancreatitis admitted to a single center from January 2001 to January 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified into mild, moderately severe and severe categories based on RAC and were simultaneously classified into mild, moderate, severe and critical grades according to DBC. Disease severity and clinical outcomes were compared between subgroups. The receiver operating curve (ROC) was used to compare the utility of RAC and DBC by calculating the area under curve (AUC). Results Among 1120 patients enrolled, organ failure occurred in 343 patients (30.6%) and infected necrosis in 74 patients (6.6%). A total of 63 patients (5.6%) died. Statistically significant difference of disease severity and outcomes was observed between all the subgroups in RAC and DBC (P<0.001). The category of critical acute pancreatitis (with both persistent organ failure and infected necrosis) had the most severe clinical course and the highest mortality (19/31, 61.3%). DBC had a larger AUC (0.73, 95%CI 0.69-0.78) than RAC (0.68, 95%CI 0.65-0.73) in classifying ICU admissions (P=0.031), but both were similar in predicting mortality(P=0.372) and prolonged ICU stay (P=0.266). Conclusions DBC and RAC perform comparably well in categorizing patients with acute pancreatitis regarding disease severity and clinical outcome. DBC is slightly better than RAC in predicting prolonged hospital stay. Persistent organ failure and infected necrosis are risk factors for poor prognosis and presence of both is associated with the most dismal outcome.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the clinical value of the three-category classification of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP).Methods Clinical data of 337 traditional SAP patients,who were admitted to Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH)from January 2001 to December 2012,were retrospectively studied.These patients were classified into moderately severe acute pancreatitis (MSAP) and severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) according to the latest 2013 Atlanta Classification.SAP patients were further categorized as critical acute pancreatitis (CAP) and non-CAP.Disease severity,therapy and prognosis among three groups were compared.Results Among the total 337 traditional SAP patients,253 were classified as MSAP and 84 as SAP.In the group of SAP,40 patients were categorized as CAP and 44 as non-CAP.Compared with non-CAP patients,CAP patients had significantly higher mortality rate which was 70％ (28/40).Other results were all significantly higher in CAP group rather than non-CAP group,including ICU admission rate 77.5％(31/40),length of ICU stay (15.5 ± 20.6) days,Ranson,APACHE Ⅱ,BISAP,MCTSI,modified Marshall scores 4.6 ± 1.4,16.8 ± 5.8,3.0 ± 1.0,8.6 ± 1.7,and 7.4 ± 2.9,respectively (P ＜ 0.01 in each endpoint).These parameters of SAP group were also significantly higher than those of MSAP group (P ＜0.01).Conclusions Using the new three-category classification to distinguish traditional severe acute pancreatitis,namely MSAP,SAP,and CAP,can better reflect the severity of disease,predict outcome and guide clinical management.