Evaluating the cutting efficiency of NiTi instruments with reciprocating motions / Avaliação da eficiência de corte de instrumentos NiTi com movimento reciprocante

Aim:This study tested a setup for in vitro experimental analysis of axial forces and torque during the preparation of artificial canals using nickel-titanium reciprocating endodontic files.Methods: The cutting efficiency of Reciproc (RC) and WaveOne (WO) reciprocating size 25/.08 instruments (n = 10) was evaluated, taking into account their dimensional and geometrical features. Measurements of the diameter at each millimeter from the tip, pitch length, helical angle, and cross-sectional design and area were assessed. Cutting efficiency tests were carried out on a specific bench device by measuring the torque and axial force required during artificial canal shaping. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). Results:The WO samples showed larger A3 mean values than did the RC instruments (p < 0.0001), despite having equal diameters at 3mm from the tip (D3) (p = 0.521). The mean values of pitch length were higher for RC than for WO instruments (p< 0.0001), with consequently smaller helical angles (p < 0.0001). For the cutting efficiency tests, the required torque was lower for the RC group when compared to the WO group, but it was significant only in the first stage of insertion in the artificial canals (p = 0.008). Regarding the apical force, the RC instruments reached higher values when compared to the WO instruments (p = 0.04) in the second stage of cutting action. Conclusion: Reciproc instruments demonstrated statistically higher cutting efficiency when compared to WaveOne instruments.

Objetivo: Este estudo testa uma configuração para análise experimental in vitro de forças axiais e torque durante o preparo de canais artificiais usando instrumentos endodônticos reciprocantes de níquel-titânio. Métodos: Foi avaliada a eficiência de corte dos instrumentos reciprocantes tamanho 25 / 0,08 (n = 10) Reciproc (RC) e WaveOne (WO), levando em consideração suas características dimensionais e geométricas. Medidas do diâmetro a cada milímetro a partir da ponta, comprimento de pitch, ângulo helicoidal e desenho da área transversal e área foram avaliados. Testes de eficiência de corte foram realizados em um dispositivo de bancada específico, medindo-se o torque e a força axial exigidos durante a modelagem de canais artificiais. A análise estatística foi feita com ANOVA one-way (α = 0,05). Resultados: As amostras de WO mostraram valores médios A3 maiores do que os instrumentos RC (p <0,0001), apesar de terem diâmetros iguais a 3 mm da ponta (D3) (p = 0,521). Os valores médios do comprimento do pitch foram maiores para o RC do que para os instrumentos do WO (p < 0,0001), com consequentemente menores ângulos helicoidais (p < 0,0001). Para os testes de eficiência de corte, o torque necessário foi menor para o grupo RC em comparação com o grupo WO, mas significativo apenas no primeiro estágio de inserção nos canais artificiais (p = 0,008). Em relação à força apical, os instrumentos RC alcançaram valores maiores em relação aos instrumentos WO (p = 0,04) no segundo estágio de corte. Conclusão: Os instrumentos Reciproc demonstraram uma eficiência de corte estatisticamente superior em comparação com os instrumentos WaveOne.

Cutting efficiency of apical preparation using ultrasonic tips with microprojections: confocal laser scanning microscopy study

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the cutting efficiency of a newly developed microprojection tip and a diamond-coated tip under two different engine powers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The apical 3-mm of each root was resected, and root-end preparation was performed with upward and downward pressure using one of the ultrasonic tips, KIS-1D (Obtura Spartan) or JT-5B (B&L Biotech Ltd.). The ultrasonic engine was set to power-1 or -4. Forty teeth were randomly divided into four groups: K1 (KIS-1D / Power-1), J1 (JT-5B / Power-1), K4 (KIS-1D / Power-4), and J4 (JT-5B / Power-4). The total time required for root-end preparation was recorded. All teeth were resected and the apical parts were evaluated for the number and length of cracks using a confocal scanning micrscope. The size of the root-end cavity and the width of the remaining dentin were recorded. The data were statistically analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and a Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the time required between the instrument groups, but the power-4 groups showed reduced preparation time for both instrument groups (p < 0.05). The K4 and J4 groups with a power-4 showed a significantly higher crack formation and a longer crack irrespective of the instruments. There was no significant difference in the remaining dentin thickness or any of the parameters after preparation. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonic tips with microprojections would be an option to substitute for the conventional ultrasonic tips with a diamond coating with the same clinical efficiency.

An experimental study of cutting efficiency of air-driven diamond burs on human tooth / 대한치과보철학회지

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the cutting efficiency of coarse grit diamond burs with air-turbine handpiece on natural tooth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four groups of coarse grit diamond bur were selected: Komet (A), Shofu (B), Premier (C), and Mani (D). The extracted maxillary central incisors were used, and ten cuts were made on each specimen, using the rotary diamond burs. The surface of each bur was measured at the upper, middle, and bottom of the bur with confocal laser scanning microscope and imaged with SEM. The data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and t-test at the significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: The surface roughness was measured. At the A diamond bur, the Sa values were 52.93 microm, 48.32 microm, 46.79 microm, 45.06 microm, and 43.43 microm for control, test 1, 2, 3, and 4 respectively. The Sa values were 50.68 microm, 45.62 microm, 44.41 microm, 44.10 microm, and 42.46 microm for B diamond bur, 58.02 microm, 55.53 microm, 52.22 microm, 48.26 microm, and 45.36 microm for C diamond bur, and 50.11 microm, 46.73 microm, 45.46 microm, 42.58 microm, and 41.80 microm for D diamond bur. Surface roughness after each bur use showed significant changes, but no significant difference was found in surface roughness change between bur systems. CONCLUSIONS: Surface roughness in the same bur system showed significant differences after each tooth preparation. However no statistically significant differences were found in surface roughness between bur systems. The SEM images between control and test 4 showed the abraded particles.