Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Type of study
Language
Year range
1.
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine ; (4): 272-277, 2018.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-718712

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: While the effect of typhoons on emergency medicine has been evaluated, data are scarce on their effects on the emergency medical service (EMS). This study evaluated the effect of typhoons on EMS patients and performance. METHODS: The study period was January 2010 to December 2012. Meteorological data regarding typhoons were provided by the Korean Meteorological Administration. EMS data were retrieved from the EMS database of the national emergency management agency. The database includes ambulance run sheets, which contain clinical and operational data. In this case-crossover study, the cases and controls were EMS calls on the day of typhoon warnings and calls one week prior to the typhoon warnings, respectively. RESULTS: During the study period, 11 typhoons affected Korea. A total of 14,521 cases were selected for analysis. Overall, there were no obvious differences between the case and control groups. However, there were statistically significant differences in age, place, and time requests. There were fewer patients between 0 and 15 years of age (P=0.01) and more unconscious patients (P=0.01) in the case group. The EMS operational performance, as measured by the times elapsed between call to start, call to field, and call to hospital did not differ significantly. There was also no significant difference in the time from hospital arrival between the cases (28.67, standard deviation 16.37) and controls (28.97, standard deviation 28.91) (P=0.39). CONCLUSION: Typhoons did not significantly affect the EMS system in this study. Further study is necessary to understand the reasons for this finding.


Subject(s)
Humans , Ambulances , Cyclonic Storms , Disasters , Emergencies , Emergency Medical Services , Emergency Medicine , Korea
2.
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health ; : 261-270, 2013.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-57762

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the socio-demographic characteristics and medical causes of death among meteorological disaster casualties and compared them with deaths from all causes. METHODS: Based on the death data provided by the National Statistical Office from 2000 to 2011, the authors analyzed the gender, age, and region of 709 casualties whose external causes were recorded as natural events (X330-X389). Exact matching was applied to compare between deaths from meteorological disasters and all deaths. RESULTS: The total number of deaths for last 12 years was 2 728 505. After exact matching, 642 casualties of meteorological disasters were matched to 6815 all-cause deaths, which were defined as general deaths. The mean age of the meteorological disaster casualties was 51.56, which was lower than that of the general deaths by 17.02 (p<0.001). As for the gender ratio, 62.34% of the meteorological event casualties were male. While 54.09% of the matched all-cause deaths occurred at a medical institution, only 7.6% of casualties from meteorological events did. As for occupation, the rate of those working in agriculture, forestry, and fishery jobs was twice as high in the casualties from meteorological disasters as that in the general deaths (p<0.001). Meteorological disaster-related injuries like drowning were more prevalent in the casualties of meteorological events (57.48%). The rate of amputation and crushing injury in deaths from meteorological disasters was three times as high as in the general deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The new information gained on the particular characteristics contributing to casualties from meteorological events will be useful for developing prevention policies.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Age Factors , Cause of Death , Demography , Disasters/statistics & numerical data , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL