ABSTRACT
Background & objectives: Human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-G plays a vital role in immunomodulation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The mounting evidence suggests a link between HLA-G gene polymorphisms, disease susceptibility and methotrexate treatment response. Various environmental factors influence the onset and progression of RA and its treatment outcomes. The aim is to identify the treatment response of HLA-G 3’ untranslated region polymorphisms to yoga-based lifestyle intervention (YBLI). Methods: In this eight-week single-blinded randomized controlled trial (CTRI/2017/05/008589), patients with RA (n=140) were randomized into two groups namely, yoga group or non-yoga group. Baseline genomic DNA was isolated using salting-out method. PCR-based methods were used for genotyping. The levels of soluble (s) HLA-G and disease activity were assessed by ELISA and disease activity score-28–erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), respectively, at baseline (day 0) and after eight weeks of intervention. Results: Low-producing sHLA-G genotypes, i.e. +3142GG and 14 bp ins/ins, showed a significant increase in sHLA-G levels after YBLI. The association analysis between HLA-G polymorphisms and treatment for RA showed no considerable differential treatment remission in either of the groups (P>0.05). The percentages of improvement were higher in the yoga group as compared to the non-yoga group in both the HLA-G +3142G>C and 14 bp ins/del polymorphisms irrespective of their respective genotypes. No significant association was found between sHLA-G levels and disease activity with respect to genotypes. Interpretation & conclusions: Yoga intervention results in improvement and reduced severity of RA in patients irrespective of the HLA-G 14 bp ins/del or +3142G>C polymorphisms. YBLI may be used as an adjunct therapy in RA independent of the genotypes
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We compared the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) with DAS28 using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) in assessing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) activity and determining European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases and performed a meta-analysis to examine comparisons between DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR by RA activity and EULAR response criteria. RESULTS: A total of ten studies were included in this meta-analysis. Significantly more patients were classified as having remission or low disease activity when using DAS28-CRP than when using DAS28-ESR (odds ratio [OR]=1.869, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.180 to 2.959, p=0.008; OR=1.411, 95% CI=1.256 to 1.586, p=7.0×10⁻⁸), whereas fewer patients were classified as having high disease activity when using DAS28-CRP than when using DAS28-ESR (OR=0.534, 95% CI=0.388 to 0.734, p=1.1×10⁻⁴). More patients were classified as having good response with criteria were based on DAS28-CRP than with DAS28-ESR (OR=1.390, 95% CI=1.183 to 1.632, p=6.10×10⁻⁵). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis demonstrates that DAS28-CRP underestimates disease activity and overestimates response by the EULAR response criteria compared to DAS28-ESR.