ABSTRACT
Propósito. Com a publicação, na última década, do resultado de grandes estudos demonstrando a correlação entre a dose de radiação recebida no coração e o aumento de eventos cardíacos adverso. Nosso estudo investiga a possibilidade de reduzir a dose cardíaca de radiação sem utilizar os protocolos ideais de inspiração profunda (DIBH). Metodologia. Analisamos os parâmetros dosimétricos referentes a 43 pacientes recebidas no departamento de radioterapia da Santa Casa de Maceió tratadas com radioterapia adjuvante em mama ou plastrão esquerdos incluindo fossa e cadeia mamária interna (MI). Todas as pacientes foram submetidas a duas tomografias e planejamentos distintos, com e sem inspiração profunda (DIBH), em um protocolo simplificado adequado para a realidade do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). Foram analisados os efeitos dosimétricos sobre o volume alvo, o coração, o pulmão esquerdo com o DIBH simplificado e com formas alternativas de delineamento da cadeia mamária interna. Resultados. Em nosso estudo, o protocolo de DIBH simplificado demonstrou uma redução da dose média cardíaca mesmo em pacientes incluindo radiação nodal regional ampla (692 cGy vs 502 cGy - p < 0,0001). As doses médias no ventrículo esquerdo (VE) (1222 cGy vs 857 cGy p < 0,0001), na artéria coronária anterior descendente (LAD) (3739 cGy vs 3345 cGy p = 0,0001) e outros parâmetros como o V25% do coração (12,4% vs 7,7% - p < 0,0001) também se mostraram reduzidas. Os delineamentos alternativos da cadeia mamária interna (MI) não produziram alterações significantes nas doses cardíacas ou pulmonares. O melhor parâmetro para predizer o benefício do DIBH foi a expansibilidade do pulmão esquerdo (r = 0,6 - p < 0,0001), sendo que os pacientes com relação entre o pulmão normal e o inspirado menor que 1,3-1,4 não obtiveram benefício significativo. Doses pulmonares também tiveram melhora estatisticamente significativa com o DIBH (média 1448 cGy vs 1294 cGy p < 0,0001; V20 32,6% vs 28,2% - p <0,0001; V5 48,7% vs 45,4% - p < 0,0005), Conclusão. Nosso estudo indica que um protocolo simplificado de DIBH pode ser uma alternativa para beneficiar pacientes selecionados que necessitam reduzir a dose cárdica de radiação em tratamentos e mama esquerda e drenagens regionais em serviços de radioterapia de alta demanda e recursos limitados
Purpose. In the last decade, seminars studies demonstrated the correlation between radiation doses received in the heart with the incidence of cardiac disease, such as acute coronary events. This aroused the interest in new techniques to reduce this problem. Numerous studies have already shown that Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH) may be the best option for reducing cardiac dose. However, the vast majority of these investigations were carried out in a different scenario from the one found in our reality. Our study investigated the feasibility of reducing the cardiac dose without using an ideal DIBH protocol, which are difficult to implement in services with high demand and low economic support. Methods. The dosimetric parameters of 43 patients from the radiotherapy department of Santa Casa de Maceió were analyzed. All patients were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy to the left breast, including supraclavicular fossa and internal mammary chain (IM). The patients underwent two different CT scans and planning, with and without DIBH, in a simplified protocol suitable for the reality of tour public health system (Free Breath Hold; no respiratory training; selection of only the patients with greater benefit). The dosimetric impact on the heart, its substructures and the left lung were studied with the simplified DIBH and with alternative forms of delineation to the IM. Results. The simplified DIBH protocol demonstrated, in our study, a reduction in mean cardiac dose for patients including wide regional nodal radiation (692 cGy vs 502 cGy - p < 0.0001). The doses for the Left ventricular (1222 cGy vs 857 cGy p < 0.0001), the Left anterior-descending coronary (3739 cGy vs 3345 cGy p = 0.0001) and other parameters such as heart V25% (12.4% vs 7, 7% - p < 0.0001) were also reduced. The doses to the heart did not achieve statistically significant reduction with alternative delineation of the MI CTV. The best parameter predicting the benefit of DIBH was the left lung expansion (r = 0.6 - p < 0.0001), with patients with a ratio lower than 1.3-1,4 having no significant benefit. Pulmonary doses also showed a statistically significant improvement with DIBH (Dmed 1448 cGy vs 1294 cGy p < 0.0001; V20 32.6% vs 28.2% - p <0.0001; V5 48.7% vs 45, 4% - p < 0.0005), but the reductions were small, as was the increase in pulmonary dose when the MI CTV is outlined to joining the supraclavicular fossa. Conclusion. Our study indicates that a simplified DIBH protocol may serve as an option to benefit selected patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated in departments with high occupation of the Linacs and low capacity for investment in new technology
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Radiation Dosage , Radiotherapy, AdjuvantABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To observe the effectiveness of the practical instruction sheet and the educational video for left-sided breast treatment in a patient receiving deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique. Two parameters, simulation time and patient satisfaction, were assessed through the questionnaire. METHODS: Two different approaches, which were the instruction sheet and educational video, were combinedly used to assist patients during DIBH procedures. The guideline was assigned at least 1 week before the simulation date. On the simulation day, patients would fill the questionnaire regarding their satisfaction with the DIBH instruction. The questionnaire was categorized into five levels: extremely satisfied to dissatisfied, sequentially. The patients were divided into four groups: not DIBH technique, DIBH without instruction materials, the DIBH with instruction sheet or educational video, and DIBH with both of instruction sheet and educational video. RESULTS: Total number of 112 cases of left-sided breast cancer were analyzed. The simulation time during DIBH procedure significantly reduced when patients followed the instruction. There was no significant difference in simulation time on the DIBH procedures between patient compliance via instruction sheet or educational video or even following both of them. The excellent level was found at 4.6 ± 0.1 and 4.5 ± 0.1, for patients coaching via instruction sheet as well as on the educational video, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patient coaching before simulation could potentially reduce the lengthy time in the simulation process for DIBH technique. Practicing the DIBH technique before treatment is strongly advised.