ABSTRACT
Objective@#To investigate the effects of traditional rehabilitation training, motor relearning and transcranial direct current stimulation on FMA,ARAT score and ADL of stroke patients.@*Methods@#Sixty-five patients with initial stroke who were admitted to Rehabilitation center of Beijing rehabilitation hospital from August 2016 to August 2018 were selected. All the patients were randomly divided into two groups: the control group and the experimental group. On this basis, the experimental group received transcranial direct current stimulation for 6 weeks, while the control group received only false stimulation. The arm motion survey test scale (ARAT) and the simplified fugl-meyer motor function scale (FMA) were used to evaluate the upper limb motor function of patients, and the modified Barthel index scale (MBI) was used to evaluate the daily living activity ability of patients.@*Results@#There was no significant difference in FMA score, ARAT score and MBI score before and after treatment between the two groups (P > 0.05). After treatment, FMA and ARAT scores of the upper limbs in the experimental group were (39.44±4.09) and (18.92±3.28), respectively, while those in the control group were (34.22±4.20) and (15.30±3.22), respectively. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (t=3.239, 2.939, all P < 0.05).@*Conclusion@#Traditional rehabilitation training, exercise relearning combined with transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) for stroke patients improved the upper limb motor function to some extent, and effectively improved the daily living ability of the patients. It is worth popularizing in clinic.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the effects of traditional rehabilitation training, motor relearning and transcranial direct current stimulation on FMA,ARAT score and ADL of stroke patients. Methods Sixty_five patients with initial stroke who were admitted to Rehabilitation center of Beijing rehabilitation hospital from August 2016 to August 2018 were selected. All the patients were randomly divided into two groups: the control group and the experimental group. On this basis, the experimental group received transcranial direct current stimulation for 6 weeks, while the control group received only false stimulation. The arm motion survey test scale (ARAT) and the simplified fugl_meyer motor function scale (FMA) were used to evaluate the upper limb motor function of patients, and the modified Barthel index scale (MBI) was used to evaluate the daily living activity ability of patients. Results There was no significant difference in FMA score, ARAT score and MBI score before and after treatment between the two groups (P > 0.05). After treatment, FMA and ARAT scores of the upper limbs in the experimental group were (39.44 ± 4.09) and (18.92 ± 3.28), respectively, while those in the control group were (34.22 ± 4.20) and (15.30±3.22), respectively. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (t=3.239, 2.939, all P < 0.05). Conclusion Traditional rehabilitation training, exercise relearning combined with transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) for stroke patients improved the upper limb motor function to some extent, and effectively improved the daily living ability of the patients. It is worth popularizing in clinic.
ABSTRACT
Objective To observe the effect of the rehabilitation garden on hemiplegic stroke patients. Methods 160 cases of cerebral vascular accident patients were randomized into observation group and control group. All patients were given conventional drug treatment and conventional rehabilitation training. The observation group was given the rehabilitation garden for rehabilitation training two times a day , each time 60 minutes. Results BBS, BI, FMA, HAMA and HAMD of The two groups of patients significantly improved. The improvement ofBBS and BI in observation group was better than that in control group (P < 0.05). HAMD and HAMA score inobservation group was significantly higher than that in control group (P < 0.01), the improvement in observationgroup is better than in control group (P < 0.01), the satisfaction rate in observation group is better than in controlgroup (P < 0.01), and the hospital stay period in observation group is better than in control group (P < 0.01).Conclusion The application of rehabilitation garden has a good effect on the rehabilitation effect of the hemiplegicstroke patients.