ABSTRACT
Objectives:Cardioplegia is essential for adequate myocardial protection. There continues to remain ambiguity regarding the ideal cardioplegia for adequate myocardial protection in congenital heart surgery. This study compares clinical outcomes using St Thomas II solution and Del Nido cardioplegia in neonates undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods: All neonates (<30 days) from 2011 to 2017 who underwent surgery requiring cardioplegic arrest were analyzed retrospectively. We divided the cohort into two groups depending on cardioplegia received, as group A (Blood cardioplegia with St Thomas II solution, n = 56) and group B (Del Nido cardioplegia, n = 48). Various demographic, intraoperative, early postoperative, and discharge variables were analyzed. Results: Two groups were similar in age, gender, pre?operative diagnosis, and risk category. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time (P = 0.002), aortic cross?clamp (ACC) time (P = 0.018), and the number of doses of cardioplegia (P < 0.001) were significantly lower with Del Nido group. Though vasoactive inotropic score (VIS) (P = 0.036) was high during the first 24 h in the immediate postoperative period in group A, there was no difference in early mortality among both groups (P = 0.749). Both groups did not show significant differences related to various postoperative and discharge variables. Conclusion: When compared to St. Thomas solution, the use of Del Nido cardioplegia solution in neonates is associated with a significant decrease in CPB and ACC times and VIS in the first 24 h after surgery. The choice of cardioplegia (St Thomas/Del Nido) in neonates does not affect early mortality and early postoperative clinical outcomes.
ABSTRACT
@#Objective To investigate the myocardial protective effects of Del Nido cardioplegia and analyze its advantages in adult cardiac surgery. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 96 adult patients undergoing cardiac valve surgery who received Del Nido cardioplegia (a DNC group) from June 2016 to January 2017 in our hospital. There were 44 males and 52 females with a mean age of 51.36±13.31 years. Meanwhile 96 patients who received conventional cardioplegia were recruited as a control group (a CTC group) and there were 53 males and 43 females with a mean age of 52.91±10.95 years. Cross-clamping time, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, total volume of and transfusion frequency of cardioplegia, the rate of spontaneous defibrillation, red blood cell transfusion and vasoactiveinotropic score at postoperative 24 hours (VIS 24) were recorded. Results No significant difference was found in age, body weight, ejection fraction, hematokrit, CPB time and cross-clamping time between the DNC group and CTC group. There was no significant difference in the rate of spontaneous defibrillation, VIS 24, cardiac enzymes and cardiactroponinI and length of ICU stay between the two groups. The total volume and transfusion frequency of cardioplegia, perioperative blood transfusion were lower in the DNC group. There was no new atrial fibrillation or in-hospital death in the two groups. Conclusion Del Nido is a good myocardial protection solution in adult cardiac valve surgery, and requires less static preload volume and reduces hemodilution and perioperative blood transfusion.
ABSTRACT
@#Objective To analyze the effect of myocardial protection between modified Del Nido cardioplegia and St. Thomas Hospital Cardioplegia in adult patients with aortic valve and mitral valve replacement. Methods From January 2014 to June 2016, 140 patients underwent aortic valve and mitral valve replacement in our hospital. According to different cardioplegia, the patients were divided into two groups including a modified Del Nido cardioplegia group (70 patients, 37 males, 33 females at mean age of 53.13±9.52 years) and a St. Thomas cardioplegia group (70 patients, 32 males, 38 females, at age of 50.71±9.29 years). We collected clinical data of the patients before operation (T1), 2 h after aortic unclamping (T2), 24 h after operation (T3) and 48 h after operation (T4). Indexes of muscle enzymes including blood center creatine kinase (CK), creatine kinase isoenzyme (CK-MB) concentration and liver function indexes including urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) concentrations, and compared the postoperative and follow-up clinical data. Results There was no statistical difference in age, weight, gender, ejection fraction baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were successfully completed combined valve replacement under cardiopulmonary bypass. The cardiopulmonary time was no statistical difference between the two groups (P>0.05). However, compared with St. Thomas cardioplegia group, modified Del Nido group was less in perfusion (1.19±0.39 vs. 2.99±0.75, P<0.001), shorter in aortic clamping time (P=0.003). No statistical difference was found in defibrillation rate after resuscitation between the two groups (P=0.779). Biochemical indicators were not statistically different at different time points between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Modified Del Nido cardioplegia has the same effect on myocardial protection with St. Thomas cardioplegia in adult patients. It reduces the frequency of reperfusion, and shortens the clamping time. There is no additional injury in the important organs such as liver, kidney. Modified Del Nido cardioplegia myocardial protection ability in adult heart valve surgery is feasible.