Applicability of Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score to Criteria of Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service in Treatment Decision of Thoracolumbar Injury

OBJECTIVE: For improving the drawbacks of previous thoracolumbar spine trauma classification, the Spine Trauma Study Group was developed new classification, Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS). The simplicity of this scoring system makes it useful clinical application. However, considering criteria of Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA), the usefulness of TLICS system is still controversial in the treatment decision of thoracolumbar spine injury. METHODS: Total 100 patients, who admitted to our hospital due to acute traumatic thoracolumbar injury, were enrolled. In 45, surgical treatment was performed and surgical treatment was decided following the criteria of HIRA in all patients. With assessing of TLICS score and Denis's classification, the treatment guidelines of TLICS and Denis's classification were applied to the criteria of Korean HIRA. RESULTS: According to the Denis's three-column spine system, numbers of patients with 2 or 3 column injuries were 94. Only 45 of 94 patients (47.9%) with middle column injury fulfilled the criteria of HIRA. According to TLICS system, operation required fractures (score>4) were 31 and all patients except one fulfilled the criteria of HIRA. Conservative treatment required fractures (score<4) were 52 and borderline fracture (score=4) were 17. CONCLUSION: The TLICS system is very useful system for decision of surgical indication in acute traumatic thoracolumbar injury. However, the decision of treatment in TLICS score 4 should be carefully considered. Furthermore, definite criteria of posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury may be necessary because the differentiation of PLC injury between TLICS score 2 and 3 is very difficult.

Neurologic Recovery According to the Spinal Fracture Patterns by Denis Classification

PURPOSE: Although Denis classification is considered as one of most clinically useful schemes for the evaluation of spinal fracture, there is little documentation on the relationship between fracture pattern and the neurologic recovery. The purpose is to evaluate the correlation between the fracture patterns according to Denis classification and neurologic recovery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 38 patients (26 men and 12 women) in this series had an average follow-up of 47.1 months, and they were all managed surgically. Denis classification had been used prospectively to determine the fracture morphology. Frankel Scale and American Spinal Injury Association Spinal Cord Injury Assessment Form [American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score] were obtained before surgery, after surgery and at the final follow-up. RESULTS: The common injuries making neurologic deterioration were burst fracture and fracture-dislocation. The degree of neurologic deficits seen first and at the final follow-up was more severe in fracture-dislocation than burst fracture. The neurologic recovery was not different between burst fracture and fracture-dislocation, assessed by Frankel grading and ASIA scoring system. The neurologic recovery evaluated by ASIA score was not different between the lumbar and thoracic spinal fracture. The neurologic recovery assessed by Frankel grade was greater in the lumbar spinal fractures in than the thoracic spinal fractures. CONCLUSION: The severity of initial and the final follow-up neurologic deficits were correlated with the fracture patterns according to Denis classification, but the neurologic recovery was not correlated.

Neurologic Injury and Recovery Patterns in the Spinal Fractures by Denis Classification / 대한척추외과학회지

PURPOSE: To determine whether there was a preponderance of a fracture type associated with early and late neurologic deterioration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The review of all the surgically managed spinal fractures from October 1989 to July 1999 was performed. Of the 83 surgically managed patients, 39 had spinal cord injury. The other 44 patients in this consecutive series had no spinal cord injury. Charts, operative notes, preoperative and postoperative plain radiographs, computed tomography scans, and follow up records of all patients were reviewed carefully from the time of surgery until last follow-up assessment. The classification of Denis had been used prospectively for all patients before their surgery to determine the fracture morphology. Frankel Scale and American Spinal Injury Association Spinal Cord Injury Assessment Form(ASIA) were obtained during follow-up evaluation for all patients. RESULTS: All patients were observed over mean 57.4 months except 1 patient who died of pulmonary thromboembolism 1 week after surgery. In Denis classification, the most common injuries were burst fracture and fracture-dislocation. The degree of neurologic injury when first seen and at the latest follow up was different between burst fracture and fracture-dislocation. The extent of neurologic recovery was not different between burst fracture and fracture-dislocation. The fracture-dislocation was common in thoracic spine and the degree of neurologic injury was most severe in thoracic spine. Instead, the burst fracture was more common in lumbar spine and the degree of neurologic injury was relatively mild in lumbar spine. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of initial posttraumatic and the last follow up neurologic injuries were correlated with the fracture patterns by Denis classification, but the extent of neurologic recovery was not correlated with the fracture patterns by Denis classification. The lumbar fracture, injuring the cauda equina and the sacral nerve roots, shows greater recovery patterns than thoracic spine fractures.