Three-dimensional evaluation of the machinability of monolithic CAD/CAM-generated posterior crowns by nano-hybrid ceramic / 대한치과재료학회지

The purpose of this study comparatively analyzed the machinability of various dental hybrid blocks manufactured by using the CAD/CAM system. Three hybrid composite blocks (Vita enamic, Lava Ultimate, GC Cerasmart) were used for experimental groups and one conventional ceramic block (Vita Mark II) was used for control. The digital impression of the master model and abutment was taken by using a scanner, and then the CAD software program was used to design restorations. The four-axis milling machine (inLab MCXL; Sirona Dental Systems GmbH, Bensheim, Germany) was used four materials. The digitized data was superimposed with 3D inspection software to quantitatively obtain the machinability of a ceramic crown, and visual differences were confirmed with a color map. The root mean square (RMS) values of ceramic crown group were statistically analyzed with one-way ANOVA (α=0.05). While there was a significant difference in the machinability of the internal surface, among four groups, there was statistically significant difference between conventional (VM group) and hybrid ceramic (VE, LU, GC groups) (p<0.05). Consequently, the machinability of VM is lower than that of other hybrid ceramics, and the machinability of VE is better than that of LU and GC. For ceramics as final restorations, manufacturing of dental restorations using hybrid composite ceramic is recommended.

Accuracy comparison between subtractive and additive methods in fabricating working model / 대한치과재료학회지

The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of the working models fabricated by the subtractive and additive processing methods based on the 3-dimensional reconstruction model. A total of 20 models were fabricated with subtractive processing method from polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) blocks using the stereolithography (STL) file of master gypsum model and another 20 models were fabricated with additive processing method using 3D printer with 0.025 mm of a layer thickness. The CAD-reference-model (CRM) and CAD-test-model (CTM) were superimposed by a software for accuracy analysis (Geomagic Qualify 13), where the STL files were transformed to point cloud data and the surface data (CRM and CTM) were subjected to initial alignment and followed by re-alignmented according to best-fit superimposition. The distances between surface data and all points, in this process, were converted to the root mean square (RMS) and averaged. In the experimental results, It was shown that the accuracy is higher in work model fabricated by additive processing method compared to one fabricated by subtractive one (p < 0.05). In addition, it is considered that the working model fabricated by subtractive processing method is to be clinically applicable by improving the improper reproducibility of the tooth surface and depressed area.

Influence of the accuracy of abutment tooth preparation on the marginal adaptation of Co-Cr alloy copings fabricated with a selective laser sintering technology / 대한치과보철학회지

PURPOSE: The purpose of present study is to examine the correlation between the accuracy of abutment preparation and the marginal adaptation of metal coping. With this view, this study compared the correlations regard to the three different manufacturing methods of selective laser sintering technique, milling and casting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two master models were made in a different way. First model with deep chamfer margin was prepared directly by a general clinician and the second model was designed by 3-D designing software program with the same abutment preparation principle and produced by computer aided manufacturing. 12 Co-Cr alloy copings were produced respectively with three different method; SLS system, CAD/CAM milling and conventional lost wax technique from each master model. The total 72 copings fully sit on the master model were stereoscopically evaluated at 40 points along the entire circumferential margin. RESULTS: Significant differences in the absolute marginal discrepancies of Co-Cr copings from SLS system (P=.0231) and casting method (P<.0001) were shown between hand preparation model and computer designed model. However, no significant difference was found between the two model groups from milling method (P=.9962). CONCLUSION: Within the limitation of this study, the effect of the accuracy of abutment preparation on the marginal adaptation of Co-Cr coping is statistically significant in SLS system and casting group. The copings produced by SLS system exhibited the lowest marginal discrepancies among all groups, and the marginal gap of this method group was influenced by the accuracy of the abutment preparation.

Evaluation of different approaches for using a laser scanner in digitization of dental impressions

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the potential clinical application of digitized silicone rubber impressions by comparing the accuracy of zirconia 3-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs) fabricated from 2 types of data (working model and impression) obtained from a laser scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten working models and impressions were prepared with epoxy resin and vinyl polysiloxane, respectively. Based on the data obtained from the laser scanner (D-700; 3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark), a total of 20 zirconia frameworks were prepared using a dental CAD/CAM system (DentalDesigner; 3shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark / Ener-mill, Dentaim, Seoul, Korea). The silicone replicas were sectioned into four pieces to evaluate the framework fit. The replicas were imaged using a digital microscope, and the fit of the reference points (P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, and P7) were measured using the program in the device. Measured discrepancies were divided into 5 categories of gaps (MG, CG, AWG, AOTG, OG). Data were analyzed with Student's t-test (alpha=0.05), repeated measures ANOVA and two-way ANOVA (alpha=0.05). RESULTS: The mean gap of the zirconia framework prepared from the working models presented a narrower discrepancy than the frameworks fabricated from the impression bodies. The mean of the total gap in premolars (P=.003) and molars (P=.002) exhibited a statistical difference between two groups. CONCLUSION: The mean gap dimensions of each category showed statistically significant difference. Nonetheless, the digitized impression bodies obtained with a laser scanner were applicable to clinical settings, considering the clinically acceptable marginal fit (120 microm).