ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone implant (OZURDEX（R）) in the treatment of macular edema (ME) caused by central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in different ages.Methods A retrospective case observation study was performed.Forty eyes of 40 patients diagnosed with ME secondary to CRVO were enrolled in the study.According to patient's age,all of the 40 eyes were divided into ＜40 years old group (20 eyes) and ≥40 years old group (20 eyes).All eyes went through best corrected visual acuity (BCVA),intraocular pressure (IOP) and optic coherence tomography (OCT) examinations.Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart was used to test visual acuity,and central macular thickness (CMT) was measured by OCT.Fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) was proceeded selectively.All eyes went through intravitreal injections off intravitreal dexamethasone implant and BCVA,IOP,OCT were tested 1 month,2,3,6,9 and 12 months after injection.After 3 months follow-up,intravitreal dexamethasone implant or ranibizumab would be injected again for patients with ME recurrence or poor treatment effects.Changes of BCVA,IOP and CMT before and after injection were observed.Results BCVA and CMT in the ＜40 years old group and ≥40 years old group were compared at different time points,and the differences were significantly different (BCVA:Fgroup =2.071,P =0.044;Ftimc.=9.551,P ＜ 0.001.CMT:Fgroup =2.402,P=0.034;Ftime =13.175,P＜0.001),compared with before injection,the BCVA at each time point of post-injection was improved,and CMT was thinner than that before injection;at 2 months after injection,the BCVA was improved and CMT was thinner than those 1 month after injection,the differences were statistically significant (all at P＜0.05);at 12 months after injection,the BCVA in the ＜40 years old group was obviously better than that in the ≥40 years old group,the CMT was much thinner than that in the ≥40 years old group,the differences were statistically significant (both at P＜0.05).Compared with before injection,the IOP at 1 month,2 and 3 months after injection was increased,the IOP at 2 months after injection was higher than that at 1 month after injection,the differences were statistically significant (both at P＜0.05).The mean number of injections was (1.8±0.9) times in the ＜40 years old group and (2.7±1.4)times in the ≥40 years old group,with a statistical difference between them (t =2.569,P =0.014).Conclusions In different age groups,patients with ME caused by CRVO can be effectively treated by intravitreal dexamethasone implant,the therapeutic effect is significant at 1 month post-injection and most improvement is shown at 2 months post-injection.Compared with patients over 40 years of age,patients under 40 years of age have better long-term results,better visual improvement,thinner CMT and less intravitreal injections.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex) in the treatment of macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).Methods Thirty-nine patients (39 eyes) with ME secondary to RVO were enrolles in this study.Of the patients,27 were male and 12 were female.The mean age was (41.9 ± 16.3) years.The mean course of disease was (5.0± 5.3) months.The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA),intraocular pressure and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed.BCVA was measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts.Central macular thickness (CMT) was measured by OCT.The mean BCVA was (13.4± 15.3) letters.The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) was (14.1 ±2.8) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa).The mean CMT was (876.1 ±437.9) μm.Of the 39 eyes,33 were central RVO,6 were branch RVO.Patients were categorized into ischemic (18 eyes)/non-ischemic (21 eyes) groups and previous treatment (22 eyes)/treatment naive (17 eyes) groups.All eyes underwent intravitreal 0.7 mg Ozurdex injections.BCVA,IOP and CMT were assessed at 1,2,3,6,9,12 months after injection.Three months after injection,intravitreal injections of Ozurdex,triamcinolone acetonide or ranibizumab could be considered for patients with ME recurrence or poor treatment effects.Change of BCVA,IOP and CMT were evaluated with paired t test.The presence of ocular and systemic adverse events were assessed.Results BCVA,IOP significantly increased and CMT significantly decreased at 1 month after injection compared to baseline in all groups (t=3.70,3.69,4.32,3.08,4.25,6.09,6.25,4.02,5.49,8.18,6.54,5.73;P＜0.05).Two months after injection,change of BCVA,IOP and CMT was most significant (t=4.93,6.80,6.71,5.53,4.97,5.89,5.13,7.68,7.31,8.67,8.31,5.82;P＜0.05).Twelve months after injection,there was no statistical difference regarding BCVA of ischemic RVO group and previous treatment group,compared to baseline (t=1.86,0.67;P＞0.05);BCVA ofnon-ischemic RVO group and treatment naive group significantly increased compared to baseline (t=2.27,2.30;P＜0.05);IOP significantly increased and CMT significantly decreased in all groups (t=0.30,0.13,4.60,3.26,0.64,1.53,3.00,4.87;P＜0.05).Twenty-seven eyes (69.2％) experiences ME recurrence (4.5± 1.5) months after injection.Most common side-effect was secondary glaucoma.41.0％ eyes had IOP more than 25 mmHg,most of which were lowered to normal range with use of topical IOP lowering drugs.Four eyes (10.3％) presented with significant cataract progression and needed surgical treatment,all were central RVO eyes.No serious ocular or systemic adverse events such as vitreous hemorrhage,retinal detachment or endophthalmitis were noted.Conclusions Intravitreal injection of Ozurdex for patients with ME secondary to RVO is effective in increasing BCVA and lowering CMT in the first few months.Significant treatment effect could be seen at 1 month after injection and was most significant at 2 months after injection.The long-term vision of eyes in non-ischemic RVO group and treatment naive group are better.69.2％ eyes experience ME recurrence at 4 months after injection.Short term adverse events were mostly secondary glaucoma and long term adverse events are mostly cataract progression.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate the use of a slow-release dexamethasone 0.7-mg intravitreal implant for cystoid macular edema (CME) secondary to intermediate uveitis and refractory to systemic steroids. Methods: A retrospective study of the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular inflammation, intraocular pressure (IOP), fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), inflammation, and adverse reactions of five patients (women, mean age of 35 years) with cystoid macular edema treated with a dexamethasone implant. Patients were evaluated in seven visits until the 150th day after the implant. Results: Four patients had bilateral pars planitis and one had bilateral intermediate uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Six dexamethasone devices were implanted, under topical anesthesia (one each in six eyes, five patients). The mean follow-up time was 5 months. The best-corrected visual acuity improved in all eyes that received an implant, with five having improvements of two or more lines. Optical coherence tomography showed thinning of the macula in all eyes treated, and we saw a correlation between the best-corrected visual acuity and retinal thinning. No serious adverse events occurred and no significant increase in intraocular pressure was observed. Conclusions: Slow-release dexamethasone intravitreal implants can effectively treat CME secondary to intermediate uveitis and refractory to systemic steroids. .
RESUMO Objetivos: Avaliar o implante intravítreo de liberação lenta de dexametasona 0,7 mg no tratamento do edema macular cistóide (EMC) secundário à uveíte intermediária refratária a corticosteroides orais. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo da acuidade visual melhor corrigida, inflamação intraocular, pressão intraocular (PIO), retinografia, tomografia de coerência óptica (OCT), inflamação e reações adversas de cinco pacientes (mulheres, idade média 35 anos) com o edema macular cistóide tratado com implante de dexametasona. Pacientes foram avaliados em 7 consultas até o 150o dia pós implante. Rsultados: Quatro pacientes apresentaram parsplanite bilateral e um, uveíte intermediária bilateral associada à artrite idiopática juvenil. Seis implantes foram inseridos sob anestesia tópica. O tempo médio de acompanhamento foi de 5 meses. A acuidade visual melhorou em todos os olhos. A tomografia de coerência óptica mostrou afinamento da mácula em todos os olhos e houve correlação entre a acuidade visual e a retina mais fina. Não ocorreu evento adverso grave. Não ocorreu aumento significativo na pressão intraocular. Conclusão: O implante intravítreo é eficaz no tratamento do edema macular cistóide secundário a uveíte intermediária refratária a esteróides sistêmicos. .
Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Uveitis, Intermediate/complications , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Delayed-Action Preparations , Drug Implants , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Macular Edema/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Visual Acuity/drug effectsABSTRACT
44 eyes (42 patients) of HSV keratitis were treated by a combined injection of poly Ⅰ: C, vitamine C and a small dose of dexamethasone with satisfactory results. 22 (88％) of 25 eyes of the superficial type were cured and 2 eyes(8％) improved; 13 (68.4％) of 19 eyes of the deep stromal type were cured and 3 eyes (15.8％) improved. The average therapeutic course was 13.6 days for the superficial type and 25.4 days for the deep stromal type. 4 eyes (19.1％) recurred during a follow-up of 6-22 months. The mechanism of curative effects and the significance of the small does of dexamethasone were discussed.