ABSTRACT
Desde 1960 houve grande avanço tecnológico na observação do aparelho digestivo com o advento dos endoscópiosflexíveis, usados inicialmente para o trato digestivo superior e posteriormente também para o inferior, permitindo diagnósticos mais precisos e realização do tratamento em alguns casos. Mesmo em situações de urgência a colonoscopia pode ser utilizada como primeira escolha podendo ser diagnóstica e terapêutica. OBJETIVO: O presente estudo teve por objetivo avaliar quais foram os resultados principais das colonoscopias realizadas no Setor de Endoscopia Digestiva do Hospital Regional de Mato Grosso do Sul. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Foram estudados 290 pacientes submetidos à colonoscopia no Serviço de EndoscopiaDigestiva do Hospital Regional do Mato Grosso do Sul, no período de novembro de 2006 a agosto de 2007. Foram analisadas as seguintes variáveis: sexo, idade, caráter de indicação do exame (urgência e eletiva) e diagnóstico. RESULTADOS: A idade média foi de 52 anos, variando de 15 a 92 anos. A maioria dos pacientes era do sexo feminino (56,5%). Dos 290 exames realizados no período foram constatados 48,5% (n=141) de colonoscopias com diagnóstico normal. Dentre os anormais houve uma prevalência de doença diverticular dos colos (n=56), seguido de pólipos (n=37), doenças inflamatórias (n=31), neoplasias (n=18) e angiodisplasia (n=7). Os pólipos apresentaram uma maior concentração em colo sigmóide (n=18) seguido pelo colo descendente e reto. Asdoenças inflamatórias apresentaram como diagnóstico colonoscópio, colite actínica (n=11) seguida por retite actínica (n=7) e retite inespecífica (n=7). Houve um maior número de procedimentos oriundos do ambulatório (73%) em contraste com internados(20%) e provenientes do Pronto Socorro (7%). CONCLUSÃO: A doença diverticular e os pólipos foram os diagnósticos preponderantes, pois a maior indicação foi a hemorragia digestiva...
Since 1960 it there was a great technological breakthrough, including the observation of the digestive system with the advent of flexible endoscopy. Initially used to the upper digestive tract and subsequently to the colon, allowing more accurate diagnoses and, in some cases, the complete treatment. Even in urgency situations, colonoscopy can be used as first choice and work as a diagnostic tool or eve the therapeutic procedure. AIM: This study analyzed the results of colonoscopy held in the Digestive Endoscopy unit at the Hospital Regional Rosa Pedrossian in Mato Grosso do Sul. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was performed a colonoscopy in 290 patients at the unit of Digestive Endoscopy in the Hospital Regional of Mato Grosso do Sul, in during november 2006 until august 2007. The results were analyzed and verified the following variables: sex, age, solicitation as elective or emergency and diagnosis. RESULTS: The age of the patients ranged from 15 to 92 years old and the mean age was 52 years. Most of the patients were female (56.5%). The colonoscopy tests showed that 48.5% (n=141) were normal. Among the abnormal there were a prevalence of colon diverticulum (n = 56), followed by polyps (n = 37), inflammatory diseases (n = 31), cancer (n = 18) and angiodisplasy (n = 7). Polyps most usual place were in colorectal sigmoid (n = 18) followed by colorectal downward and rectum. The inflammatory diseases were shown as actinic colitis (n = 11) followed by actinic proctitte (n = 7) and nonspecific proctite (n = 7). There was a higherprevalence of procedures from the ambulatory 73%, interns 20% and from the emergency room 7%. CONCLUSION: The predominant diagnosis was diverticulum disease, followed by polyps. Digestive hemorrhage was the main signal noticed by the doctors who asked for the exam. With a high incidence of polyps, and mostly in sigmoid, just evidenced the how important the retosigmoidoscopy is...
Subject(s)
Angiodysplasia , Colonic Diseases , Colonoscopy , Endoscopy , Intestinal PolyposisABSTRACT
Objective To analyze the cost of capsule endoscopy in diagnosing small bowel bleeding and to compare it with traditional diagnostic methods.Methods The patients suspected with small bowel bleeding were divided into group A(n=58,collected during 1998 to 2005)diagnosed with traditional processes and group B (n=93,collected during 2002 to January 2005)diagnosed with capsule endoscopy.The diagnostic yield,specific treatments,examination costs and other accumulated costs of two groups was compared.The examination cost ratio and the integration cost ratio were evaluated.The sensitivity analysis was performed.Results The diagnostic yield of small bowel bleeding in group A and group B were 22.4%(13/58) and 86%(80/93),respectively.The total of examination costs were 133 750 RMB and 790 500 RMB,respectively.The examination costs in group B(RMB 9881.3/each) was slightly lower than group A(RMB 10 288.5/each).Furthermore,as the diagnostic yield of group B was significantly higher than group A(P=0.001).The specific treatments based on the results of the diagnosis was 37.4% higher in group B(49.5%) than group A(12.1%).That means the cost of repeat- ed consultations,emergencies room visit,examinations,supporting treatments and hospitalizations in group B were significantly decreased.After the adjustment,the cost in group B(RMB 9881/patient) was lower than group A(16 361.5 RMB in one month—97 424.0 over 5 years/patient).The total cost of each patient in group A was 6480.2—87 542.7 RMB more than group B,which represented 1.7—9.9 folds increase.Conclusions The patients who suspected with small bowel bleeding and had a negative results of gastroscopy and colonoscopy were recommended to have capsule endoscopy which yields early diagnosis and less cost.