ABSTRACT
Objective:To construct a follow-up evaluation index system for "Diagnosis of Brucellosis" (WS 269-2019), and provide a reference basis for the next revision and improvement of the standard.Methods:The evaluation index system for "Diagnosis of Brucellosis" (WS 269-2019) was preliminarily established by consulting relevant references and materials. The experts in the field of diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control of brucellosis were selected, and two rounds of expert consultation were carried out in the form of questionnaires using the Delphi method. The necessity and availability of evaluation indicators were scored, and suggestions for modifying and adding indicators were put forward. Based on this, a standard follow-up evaluation index system was established. At the same time, a judgment matrix was constructed combined with the Saaty scale, and the analytic hierarchy process was used to calculate the weight of each index in the system.Results:After 2 rounds of expert ( n = 10) consultation, a standard follow-up evaluation index system for "Diagnosis of Brucellosis" (WS 269-2019) was constructed with 3 first-level indexes, 8 second-level indexes and 21 third-level indexes. The positive coefficients of experts in 2 rounds of questionnaires were both 100%; the coefficient of authority of experts was 0.82; the Kendall's coefficients of concordance of first-level, second-level and third-level indexes were 0.722, 0.260, and 0.181, respectively, with P < 0.05. Among the first-level indexes, the weight of standard quality evaluation was the highest (0.364), and the weight of standard implementation status was the lowest (0.278); among the second-level indexes, the combined weight of social benefits was the highest (0.186), and the combined weight of advanced nature was the lowest (0.043); among the third-level indexes, the combined weight of timely diagnosis rate was the highest (0.096), and the combined weight of consistency with technical data was the lowest (0.009). Conclusions:The constructed follow-up evaluation index system for "Diagnosis of Brucellosis" (WS 269-2019) is scientific and reliable, which evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively, reduces the defects of a single evaluation, and provides a basis for subsequent revision and improvement of the standard.
ABSTRACT
@# Objective - （ ） To explore the influence on the diagnosis of occupational noise induced deafness ONID using three ， Methods versions of diagnostic criteria in 2002 2007 and 2014. A total of 1 766 workers who asked for ONID diagnosis were selected as the research subjects using judgment sampling method. The results of pure tone audiometry were collected. GBZ 49-2002Diagnostic Criteria of Occupational Noise-inducedHearing Loss（ The ONID was diagnosed using hereinafter referred to as GBZ 49-2002），GBZ 49-2007Diagnostic Criteria of Occupational Noise-induced Deafness（ GBZ 49-2007） hereinafter referred to as GBZ 49-2014 Diagnostic of Occupational Noise-induced Deafness（ GBZ 49-2014）， and hereinafter referred to as and the Results - - ， - diagnostic results were compared. Compared with GBZ 49 2002 and GBZ 49 2007 diagnosis with GBZ 49 2014 had （ vs ， vs ， P ）， （ vs ， a higher rate of ONID 57.9% 66.0% 44.8% 66.0% both <0.01 and had a higher rate of mild ONID 47.3% 54.6% vs ， P ） - - 36.0% 54.6% both <0.01 . The diagnostic rate for ONID using GBZ 492014 was higher than those using GBZ 49 2002 and - （ P ）Conclusion - GBZ 49 2007 in each age groups all <0.01 . GBZ 49 2014 improved the diagnostic rate of ONID compared - - with GBZ 49 2002 and GBZ 49 2007. The reason is related to the inclusion of 4 000 Hz hearing threshold with a weight of 0.1 - as the diagnostic hearing threshold and the use of a new age and gender correction method in GBZ 49 2014.
ABSTRACT
Cervical spine surgery with many focus and heated topics has gained increasing attention in the field of spine surgery. The surgical treatment has been widely adopted for routine treatment of cervical spondylosis in the various hospitals. According to the progressive research in recent years, the Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Surgery convened related experts and organized in-depth discussions to standardize the diagonosis, classification and non-surgical treatment of cervical spondylosis, based on the summary of symposiums focusing on cervical spine, published in Chinese Journal of Surgery in 1984, 1992 and 2008 respectively. The consensus was finally reached following the summary of the basic concepts and controversial issues, which included increased accuracy in the definition and treatment principles of cervical spondylosis. In this consensus, the revision and modification of the classification and diagnostic criteria of cervical spondylosis was concerned as well as the basic principles and methods of non-surgical treatment of cervical spondylosis.This consensus only provides academic guidance.
ABSTRACT
Cervical spine surgery with many focus and heated topics has gained increasing attention in the field of spine surgery. The surgical treatment has been widely adopted for routine treatment of cervical spondylosis in the various hospitals. According to the progressive research in recent years, the Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Surgery convened related experts and organized in-depth discussions to standardize the diagonosis, classification and non-surgical treatment of cervical spondylosis, based on the summary of symposiums focusing on cervical spine, published in Chinese Journal of Surgery in 1984, 1992 and 2008 respectively. The consensus was finally reached following the summary of the basic concepts and controversial issues, which included increased accuracy in the definition and treatment principles of cervical spondylosis. In this consensus, the revision and modification of the classification and diagnostic criteria of cervical spondylosis was concerned as well as the basic principles and methods of non-surgical treatment of cervical spondylosis.This consensus only provides academic guidance.
ABSTRACT
Objective To analyze the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MS) in Kazakh population, using the NCEP-ATP Ⅲ, CDS, IDF MS standards. Methods Questionnaire-based survey,physical examination and blood testing were conducted according to cluster random samplings in Kazakh residents in Xinjiang. 2745 samples were collected and diagnosed by NCEP-ATP Ⅲ, CDS,IDF standards to analyze the prevalence, with the distribution of its main components of MS, among the Kazakhs population. Results The prevalence rates of MS diagnosed by NCEP-ATP Ⅲ, CDS,IDF standards were 18.5%, 14.2% and 26.6%, while they became 14.2%, 10.9% and 20.1% after standardized by age. The prevalence of MS diagnosed by NCEP-ATP Ⅲ and IDF standard in males were higher than in females, while CDS was in the opposite situtation. The prevalence of MS by these three standards increased with age. Among all the main components of MS diagnosed after these three standardization process, the prevalence of obesity, blood pressure rising and the abnormity of HDL-C were rather high. The prevalence of MS main components ≥1, ≥2, ≥3, ≥4, 5 ranked the highest compared to the lowest as to the IDF, ATP Ⅲ ' and CDS diagnostic. standards Conclusion The prevalence rates and gender distribution of MS diagnosed by different standards among Kazakhs were different. The prevalence of IDF standard was the highest, with the IDF standard better than the others in early identifying the risk factors of cardiovascular disease.
ABSTRACT
The principle of TCM diagnosis standard is communicational convenience, and the international universal standard recommended by WHO should also be paid attention to. When there’s no corresponding standard, inferior standard is available, but self made standard is generally not accepted. It’s suggested to apply the same standard for one program. The standards include international standard, regional standard, domestic standard, industrial standard, provincial standard and enterprise standard, the hierarchies and levels of these standards reduce successively. It’s thought that medical standard consists of international standard (issued by WHO or set by international academic conference), domestic standard (set by government authorities, national academic organization and conference), diagnosis standard set by provincial academic organization and textbook standard by universities and colleges. A lot of literature network database, as well as ICD-10, therapy guide, professional periodicals, professional society website, and books could be used for searching. TCM clinical trials also cover syndrome diagnosis standard. The conclusion standard and exclusion standard setting and influence of improper standard setting is also discussed in this article.