ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the technical feasibility of four-dimensional (4D) CT for the functional evaluation of the pediatric diaphragm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 22 consecutive children (median age 3.5 months, age range 3 days–3 years), 4D CT was performed to assess diaphragm motion. Diaphragm abnormalities were qualitatively evaluated and diaphragm motion was quantitatively measured on 4D CT. Lung density changes between peak inspiration and expiration were measured in the basal lung parenchyma. The diaphragm motions and lung density changes measured on 4D CT were compared between various diaphragm conditions. In 11 of the 22 children, chest sonography was available for comparison. RESULTS: Four-dimensional CT demonstrated normal diaphragm (n = 8), paralysis (n = 10), eventration (n = 3), and diffusely decreased motion (n = 1). Chest sonography demonstrated normal diaphragm (n = 2), paralysis (n = 6), eventration (n = 2), and right pleural effusion (n = 1). The sonographic findings were concordant with the 4D CT findings in 90.9% (10/11) of the patients. In diaphragm paralysis, the affected diaphragm motion was significantly decreased compared with the contralateral normal diaphragm motion (−1.1 ± 2.2 mm vs. 7.6 ± 3.8 mm, p = 0.005). The normal diaphragms showed significantly greater motion than the paralyzed diaphragms (4.5 ± 2.1 mm vs. −1.1 ± 2.2 mm, p < 0.0001), while the normal diaphragm motion was significantly smaller than the motion of the contralateral normal diaphragm in paralysis (4.5 ± 2.1 mm vs. 7.6 ± 3.8 mm, p = 0.01). Basal lung density change of the affected side was significantly smaller than that of the contralateral side in diaphragm paralysis (89 ± 73 Hounsfield units [HU] vs. 180 ± 71 HU, p = 0.03), while no significant differences were found between the normal diaphragms and the paralyzed diaphragms (136 ± 66 HU vs. 89 ± 73 HU, p = 0.1) or between the normal diaphragms and the contralateral normal diaphragms in paralysis (136 ± 66 HU vs. 180 ± 71 HU, p = 0.1). CONCLUSION: The functional evaluation of the pediatric diaphragm is feasible with 4D CT in select children.
Subject(s)
Child , Humans , Diaphragm , Diaphragmatic Eventration , Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography , Lung , Paralysis , Pleural Effusion , Thorax , UltrasonographyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: While respiratory distress is accepted as the only indication for diaphragmatic plication surgery, sleep disorders have been underestimated. In this study, we aimed to detect the sleep disorders that accompany diaphragm pathologies. Specifically, the association of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome with diaphragm eventration and diaphragm paralysis was evaluated. METHODS: This study was performed in Süreyyapasa Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital between 2014-2016. All patients had symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea (snoring and/or cessation of breath during sleep and/or daytime sleepiness) and underwent diaphragmatic plication via video-assisted mini-thoracotomy. Additionally, all patients underwent pre- and postoperative full-night polysomnography. Pre- and postoperative clinical findings, polysomnography results, Epworth sleepiness scale scores and pulmonary function test results were compared. RESULTS: Twelve patients (7 males) with a mean age of 48 (range, 27-60) years and a mean body mass index of 25 (range, 20-30) kg/m2 were included in the study. Preoperative polysomnography showed obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in 9 of the 12 patients (75%), while 3 of the patients (25%) were regarded as normal. Postoperatively, patient complaints, apnea hypopnea indices, Epworth sleepiness scale scores and pulmonary function test results all demonstrated remarkable improvement. CONCLUSION: All patients suffering from diaphragm pathologies with symptoms should undergo polysomnography, and patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome should be operated on. In this way, long-term comorbidities of sleep disorders may be prevented.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Diaphragmatic Eventration/physiopathology , Diaphragm/physiopathology , Polysomnography/methods , Respiratory Paralysis/physiopathology , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/physiopathology , Sleep Wake Disorders/physiopathology , Diaphragmatic Eventration/diagnosis , Forced Expiratory Volume/physiology , Postoperative Period , Preoperative Period , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Respiratory Paralysis/diagnosis , Severity of Illness Index , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/surgery , Sleep Wake Disorders/diagnosis , Statistics, Nonparametric , Supine Position/physiology , Vital Capacity/physiologyABSTRACT
Measurement of respiratory muscle strength is useful in order to detect respiratory muscle weakness and to quantify its severity. Apropos of a patient with bilateral diaphragmatic paralysis, we review the clinical manifestations and methods for assessing the strength of the respiratory muscles. In patients with severe respiratory muscle weakness, vital capacity and total lung capacity are reduced but are a non-specific and relatively insensitive measure. Conventionally, inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength has been assessed by maximal inspiratory and expiratory mouth pressures sustained for one second (PIMax and PEMax). The sniffmanoeuvre is natural and probably easier to perform. Sniff pressures are more reproducible and useful measure of diaphragmatic strength. However, the PIMax-PEMax and sniff manoeuvres are volition dependent, and submaximal efforts are most likely to occur in patients who are ill or breathless. Non-volitional tests include measurements of twitch esophageal, gastric and transdiaphragmatic pressure during bilateral electrical and magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation. Electrical phrenic nerve stimulation is technically difficult and is also uncomfortable and painful. Magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation is less painful and transdiaphragmatic pressure is reproducible in normal subjects. Systematic clinical evaluation and additional laboratory tests allow the diagnosis in most patients with respiratory muscle weakness.
La evaluación de la fuerza de los músculos respiratorios permite diagnosticar y cuantificar la gravedad de la debilidad muscular en diferentes enfermedades. A propósito de un paciente con parálisis diafragmática bilateral, hemos revisado el cuadro clínico y los procedimientos diagnósticos para evaluar la fuerza de los músculos respiratorios. En los pacientes con debilidad muscular respiratoria severa, disminuye la capacidad vital y la capacidad pulmonar total, pero es una medida inespecífica y relativamente insensible. Tradicionalmente, la fuerza muscular respiratoria es evaluada midiendo la presión inspiratoria y espiratoria máximas en la boca sostenidas durante un segundo (PIMax y PEMax). La medición de la presión inspiratoria máxima en la nariz (SNIP) es una maniobra natural, más simple de medir y más reproducible, siendo útil en la evaluación de la fuerza diafragmática. Sin embargo, estas técnicas no invasivas son operador dependiente, por lo tanto, esfuerzos submáximos es más probable que ocurran en pacientes graves o con disnea. Las mediciones de las presiones esofágica, gástrica y transdiafragmática mediante estimulación eléctrica o magnética del nervio frénico no son dependientes de la voluntad y son más confiables. Sin embargo, la estimulación eléctrica del nervio frénico es técnicamente difícil y puede ser incómoda y dolorosa. La estimulación magnética del nervio frénico es menos dolorosa y la medición de la presión transdiafragmática es reproducible en sujetos normales. La evaluación clínica sistemática y los exámenes de laboratorio complementarios permiten establecer el diagnóstico en la mayoría de los pacientes con debilidad de los músculos respiratorios.