ABSTRACT
Introducción: la inclusión del rituximab para el tratamiento del linfoma B difuso de células grandes generó la necesidad de reevaluar los factores pronósticos que se empleaban convencionalmente, y la de explorar otros que podrían resultar útiles para establecer el pronóstico. Objetivo: describir los principales factores clínicos, hematológicos, bioquímicos e inmunohistoquímicos que han sido útiles para el pronóstico en estudios de seguimiento de pacientes con linfoma B difuso de células grandes tratados con esquemas de quimioterapia que contenían rituximab. Resultados: entre los factores con significancia para el pronóstico se encontraron el Índice Pronóstico Internacional (IPI) revisado, la infiltración de la médula ósea, la presencia de masa voluminosa, la expresión de CD5 y el porcentaje de expresión de Ki-67; en contraste, es controversial la aplicación de otros factores como el IPI convencional, la expresión de Bcl-2, Bcl-6 y el perfil inmunohistoquímico.
Introduction: The inclusion of rituximab for treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) generated the need to re-assess the conventionally employed prognostic factors and to explore others that could be useful for prognostic purposes. Objective: To describe the most important clinical, hematological, biochemical and immunohistochemical factors that have been useful for prognostic purposes in follow-up studies of patients with DLBCL treated with chemotherapy plus rituximab. Results: The following factors were found to have prognostic significance: the revised International Prognostic Index, bone marrow infiltration, the presence of a bulky mass, CD5 expression and the percentage of Ki-67 expression. Contrariwise, the application of other factors remains controversial: conventional IPI, Bcl-2 and Bcl-6 expression, and the immunohistochemical profile.
Subject(s)
Humans , Lymphoma, B-Cell , Carcinoma, Large Cell , Rituximab , Prognosis , NeoplasmsABSTRACT
In order to compare the prognoses of patients with diffuse malignant lymphomas on the basis of histology and immunophenotypes, we retrospectively studied 62 cases of diffuse lymphoma arising in lymph nodes. We also evaluated the reactivity patterns of monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) LN1, LN2 and LN3 to determine the criteria for making a differential diagnosis in B cell lymphomas. The immunologic phenotypes were determined by the avidin biotin peroxidase complex method, using frozen or paraffin fixed tissues. The majority (66.3%) were B cell with the remaining 20.9% being T cell and 12.9% were non-B, non-T cell lineage. Immunological heterogeneity was found especially in the mixed small and large cell and the immunoblastic lymphomas. There was no significant difference between B- and T-cell lymphomas with respect to survival and death (P > 0.05). Histologically 79% (49/62) of the lymphoma was large cell and 21% (13/62), small cell lymphoma. There was a difference in prognosis between low, intermediate and high-grade of lymphomas. However there were no significant differences among the subtypes of the diffuse aggressive lymphomas. Factors associated with poor prognosis were advanced stages (P < 0.025) and histology of the malignant lymphomas. MoAb LN1, LN2 and LN3 gave positive staining in 83.3%, 91.7% and 60% of B cell lymphomas, respectively. The most common phenotypic pattern in B cell lymphomas was LN1+, LN2+, LN3+/-, suggestive of follicular center cell origin. As a panel, phenotypic patterns of MoAb LN1, LN2 and LN3 may be useful in differentiation of follicular center cell lymphoma from others.