ABSTRACT
Abstract: La impresión intraoral permite al odontólogo obtener directamente los datos de las piezas dentales que se requiera rehabilitar, otorgándole mayor precisión y eliminando así de la fase clínica la toma de impresión y la fabricación del modelo, aspectos sensibles a errores. El objetivo de la presente revisión es identificar el sistema de impresión digital intraoral más preciso y además identificar los factores que afectan a la precisión de esta en odontología restauradora. Mediante una revisión bibliográfica con búsqueda en las bases de datos de PubMed y Embase se obtuvieron 153 artículos, luego de la evaluación cualitativa se incluyeron en la revisión 14 que cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión y exclusión. Se determinó que la experiencia del dentista, la convergencia en la preparación dental y la terminación cervical son determinantes al momento de la toma de impresión digital, sin embargo, el uso o no de polvo no es relevante. El sistema de impresión digital Lava C.O.S., iTero y True definition son los más precisos dependiendo siempre del tipo de rehabilitación a realizar.
Abstract: Digital impresión allows the dentist to directly obtain the data of the dental pieces that neet to be rehabilitated, giving it greater precisión and thus eliminating the impression and manufacturing of the dental model, error-sensitive aspects of the clinical phase. The aim of this review is to identify the most accurate intraoral digital impression system and identifiy the factors that affect the accuracy in the restorative dentistry. Through a bibliographic review with search in PubMed and Embase databases, 153 articles were obtained, after qualitative evaluation they were included in the revisión 14 that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. It was determined that the experience of the dentist, the convergence in the dental preparation and the cervical termination are decisive at the accuracy of the digital impression, however, the use or not of dust is not relevant. The Lava C.O.S., iTero and True definition are the most accurate always depending on the type of rehabilitation to be performed.
Subject(s)
Dental Impression Technique/instrumentation , DermatoglyphicsABSTRACT
Objective To study CEREC Bluecam digital impressions in tooth preparation of fixed bridge.Methods Totally 80 patients of tooth preparation of 3 units fixed bridge were divided into experiment group (with CEREC Bluecam digital impressions system) and control group (with traditional method) randomly,and then captured the CEREC Bluecam digital impressions and made the dental models after the tooth preparation.Shoulders width,smooth and continuation of shoulders,paleness of shoulders edge,axial chamfers,axial converge degree,occlusal space and common path of insertion were analyzed.Results In the digital impressions in the equality of shoulders width,smooth and continuation of shoulders,paleness of shoulders edge,axial chamfers,axial converge degree,occlusal space and common path of insertion,the experiment group was better than control group:95.0％ (38 cases) vs.62.5％ (25 cases),92.5％ (37 cases) vs.77.5％ (31 cases),97.5％ (39 cases) vs.75.0％ (30 cases),95.0％ (38 cases) vs.72.5％ (29 cases),90.0％ (36 cases) vs.65.0％ (26 cases),100.0％ (40 cases) vs.52.5％ (21 cases),and 97.5％ (39 cases)vs.75.0％ (30 cases),respectively,all (P＜0.05).In the dental models,the experiment group was better than control group:87.5％ (35 cases) vs.60.0％ (24 cases),97.5％ (39 cases) vs.75.0％ (30 cases),90.0％ (36 cases) vs 62.5％ (25 cases),95.0％ (38 cases) vs 75.0％(30 cases),92.5％ (37 cases) vs 70.0％ (28 cases),100.0％ (40 cases) vs.72.5％ (29 cases),and 100.0％ (40 cases) vs.65.0％ (26 cases),respectively,(all P＜0.05).Conclusions The tooth preparation quality with the CEREC Bluecam digital impressions is better than that of the traditional method.