Planificación pre-operatoria digital en artroplastia total de cadera / Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty

Introducción: La planificación preoperatoria favorece la realización de un acto quirúrgico sin complicaciones. Actualmente existe escasa información a nivel nacional sobre la eficacia de la planificación pre-operatoria digital por lo que el objetivo del presente estudio es el analizar los resultados de la implementación de esta estrategia en una población de pacientes con indicación de artroplastia total de cadera. Materiales y métodos: Estudio observacional, prospectivo, analítico. Se realizó un muestreo no probabilístico de casos consecutivos atendidos en la Cátedra de Ortopedia y Traumatología de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas (U.N.A). Fueron captados pacientes >18 años con indicación de ATC, entre diciembre 2018 ­ octubre 2019, previo consentimiento informado. Se relevaron datos cuya caracterización fue posible mediante un instrumento establecido previamente, ingresado en base Excel. Se utilizó el software TraumaCad® versión 2.5 de Brainlab y marcadores radiológicos King Mark®. Fueron comparados ambos tipos de planificación ejecutando análisis estadísticos con el software R.v3.4.2., siendo un valor p ˂0.05, considerado estadísticamente significativa. Resultados: 57 pacientes fueron evaluados con el método digital y los resultados fueron comparados con los de 42 pacientes en los que se utilizó una planificación manual. La relación masculino-femenino fue 1/1, siendo los del grupo de 50 a 60 años, los más afectados. La coxartrosis primaria y la necrosis ósea aséptica fueron los diagnósticos más frecuentes. El tiempo quirúrgico, la correlación entre planificación y resultados para componentes acetabular, femoral, presentaron mejores resultados en el grupo de pacientes con planificación digital. Conclusión: La planificación digital comparada con la manual presentó mayor eficacia.

Introduction: Preoperative planning allows a surgical act without complications. It can be manual or digital. Its usefulness in total hip arthroplasty (ATC) is important, being digital seemingly more beneficial since it reduces surgical time and complications. The present study analyzed the effectiveness of the digital modality. Materials and methods: Observational, prospective, analytical study. Non-probabilistic sampling of consecutive cases attended in Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology of the Medicine Scholl (Universidad Nacional de Asunción). Patients> 18 years of age were indicated with ATC indication, between december 2018 to october 2019, with prior informed consent. Data whose characterization was made possible by means of a previously established instrument, entered in Excel basis, were released. Each patient had both types of planning: manual and digital. For TraumaCad® version 2.5 Brainlab software and King Mark® radiological markers were used for the digital. Both types of planning were compared by executing statistical analyzes with the software R.v3.4.2., being a value p <0.05, considered statistically significant. Results: 57 patients were evaluated with the digital method and 42 with the manual. The male-female ratio was 1/1, with those in the 50-60 age group being the most affected. The most frequent reason for consultation was hip pain, with primary coxarthrosis and aseptic bone necrosis being their cause. The consultation time 1 and surgery was 12.5 days. The surgical time, the correlation between planning and results for acetabular, femoral components, were more effective with digital planning. Conclusion: Digital planning compared to the manual is more effective.

Comparison of Conventional and Digital Templating Technique in Total Hip Arthroplasty

PURPOSE: To examine the effectiveness of digital templating in patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty by comparing and analyzing the accuracy of acetate and digital templating. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and nine patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty between November 2002 and May 2006 were assigned to the acetate templating group (group I), and 113 patients between June 2006 and April 2009 were assigned to the digital templating group (group II). The sizes of the acetebular cup and femoral stem were examined to determine the accuracy of each method. RESULTS: In group I, acetabular cup accuracy was found in 46.8% of cases, and 94.5% showed a mismatch less than +/- 1 sizes. In the case of the femoral stem, accuracy was found in 53.2% and 92.7% showed a mismatch. In group II, acetebular cup accuracy was observed in 43.4% of cases, and 92.9% showed a mismatch below +/- 1 size. In femoral stem cases, 46.9% were accurate and 93.8% showed a mismatch. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of the digital templating method is equivalent to that of acetate templating, and should replace acetate templating before the operation.

Comparison of Digital Templating with Manual Templating for Total hip Replacement / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study are to compare digital with manual templating in preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty and to assess the usability of digital templating. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conventional and digital radiographs performed prior to hip arthroplasty in forty one patients. Preoperative templating was performed by four independent observers with manual and digital templates on a Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) workstation. In all cases, acetabular cup, femoral stem sizes and length of femoral neck were measured. Intra- and interobserver agreement and predictability of real component size were calculated with weighted kappa analysis and Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: For acetabular cup and femoral stem size, inter- and intraobserver agreement was substantial, nevertheless, for length of femoral neck, it was poor in both methods. Comparing with the real size, digital templating method showed statistically significant predictability for acetabular cup size (p=0.001). However, there was no significant difference in femoral stem size and the length of femoral neck by both methods (p=0.074, p=0.140). CONCLUSION: Both inter- and intraobserver agreement was similar. However, considering advantage of PACS system and superior predictability of digital templating technique, we recommend the preoperative digital templating in hospital with PACS system.