ABSTRACT
AIM: To analyze the effects of dual viscoelastic agents DisCoVisc and sodium hyaluronate on corneal endothelium of patients after phacoemulsification and foldable intraocular lens(IOL)implantation.METHODS: A total of 247 patients(285 eyes)with cataract treated in Jingmen Aier Eye Hospital between June 2017 and December 2019 were selected, and they were divided into DisCoVisc group(123 cases, 141 eyes)and sodium hyaluronate group(124 cases, 144 eyes)by random number table method. Both groups were treated with phacoemulsification and foldable IOL implantation. DisCoVisc and 1.7% sodium hyaluronate were used as viscoelastic agents in DisCoVisc group and sodium hyaluronate group, respectively. The two groups were compared in terms of intraoperative ultrasound time(UST), cumulative dissipated energy(CDE), time for aspiration of viscoelastic agents after IOL implantation, corneal edema at 1d, 1wk, 1 and 3mo after operation, corneal endothelial cell density(ECD)and ECD loss rates before operation and at 3mo after operation, coefficient variation of corneal endothelial cell size(CV), percentage of corneal hexagonal endothelial cells(6A), intraocular pressure, the proportions of patients with uncorrected visual acuity ≥0.5 and central corneal thickness(CCT)values before and after operation at 1d, 1wk and 1mo.RESULTS:There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in UST, CDE, aspiration time of viscoelastic agents(P >0.05)or corneal edema both rate on day 1 after operation(P>0.05). Corneal edema disappeared at 1 wk after operation. The ECD loss rate in DisCoVisc group was significantly lower than that in sodium hyaluronate group at 3mo after operation(P<0.05). Intraocular pressure, the proportion of patients with uncorrected visual acuity ≥0.5 and CCT values showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups before and after operation at 1d, 1wk and 1mo(P >0.05).CONCLUSION: DisCoVisc, as the viscoelastic agent in phacoemulsification and foldable IOL implantation for patients with Emery-Little grade Ⅱ-Ⅲ lens nucleus hardness, can better protect the patients' corneal endothelium.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and intraoperative characteristics of DisCoVisc with those of Hyal 2000 (sodium hyaluronate 1.0%) in cataract surgery. METHODS: Cataract surgery was performed on 60 eyes in 49 patients who were diagnosed with moderate cataracts. 30 eyes were performed with DisCoVisc and a control group with 30 eyes using Hyal 2000 (sodium hyaluronate 1.0%). Phacodynamics was evaluated including ultrasound (US) time, mean US intensity, cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), and amount of used balanced salt solution. Corneal endothelium and corneal thickness were measured preoperatively and 1 day and 1 month and 2 months postoperatively. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in phacodynamic parameters in the two groups. The central corneal thickness change from preoperatively to postoperatively in the DisCoVisc group was +0.07 +/- 2.44 microm and Hyal 2000 group +0.84 +/- 2.93 microm (p = 0.032) at 2 months. Corneal endothelial cell loss (ECL)(%) at 2 months was 7.67 +/- 8.01% in DisCoVisc group and 13.23 +/- 15.5% in the Hyal 2000 group (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: There was signicant difference between DisCoVisc and Hyal 2000 in the changes of CCT, ECD (Endothelial cell density). (DisCoVisc is effective and provides advantages both cohesive OVDs and dispersive OVDs).
Subject(s)
Humans , Cataract , Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss , Endothelium, Corneal , EyeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare the corneal wetting properties of balanced salt solution (BSS) and ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD) during cataract surgery. METHODS: The patients with senile cataract were randomly assigned to receive either BSS or viscous dispersive OVD for maintaining optical clarity during phacoemulsification. Intraoperative factors (VAS pain score, occurrence of corneal punctate epithelial erosions (PEE)) and postoperative factors (visual acuity, Oxford staining score, changes in endothelial cell counts, corneal thickness and volume) were compared. RESULTS: Twenty-two eyes were assigned to the BSS group and; 33 eyes were assigned to the OVD group. There were no significant differences in demographic variable between the 2 groups. Intraoperative PEE was observed in 6 eyes in the BSS group and in 2 eyes in the OVD group. The incidence of PEE in the OVD group was significantly lower than in the BSS group (p = 0.045). There were no significant differences in other parameters (VAS pain score, postoperative factors). CONCLUSIONS: Corneal wetting with OVD (Discovisc(R)) provides better surgical view and reduces mechanical damage to the corneal surface without additional material or cost than BSS.