ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the current status of China's pharmacy discipline rankings, and compare the development gap between China's pharmacy disciplines and world-class pharmacy disciplines to explores the development path of building a world-class pharmacy discipline. METHODSE: Website research, literature research, and comparative analysis were adopted. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The ranking status of pharmacy disciplines in China is compared and analyzed, and from the three aspects of the index system, international influence, and innovative talents training, the development path of building world-class pharmacy discipline in China is proposed.
ABSTRACT
@#By comparing the characteristics of ARWU, US News, QS and THE evaluation system, this article studies the relevant indexes and weights of pharmaceutical disciplines, analyzes the world ranking and index gaps of Chinese pharmaceutical disciplines, and puts forward that we should attach importance to the output of high-level scientific research achievements, strengthen the quality of talent cultivation, promote international exchange and scientific research cooperation, and improve the discipline reputation, so as to accelerate the construction of pharmaceutical disciplines in China.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To make a detailed analysis of the four international discipline ranking index systems, namely QS, ARWU, THE and US News and provide suggestions for the construction of world-class pharmaceutical disciplines. METHODS: Literature survey, website survey, comparative analysis and content analysis was used. RESULTS: The four international disciplines ranking index systems all set the threshold of dissertation publication, inspected the teaching situation and academic output, but there are differences in disciplines classification, data sources, scientific research output index and internationalization index. CONCLUSION: The status quo of pharmacy discipline ranking in Chinese universities is analyzed by data comparison. Suggestions on building world-class pharmaceutical discipline are put forward from four aspects: scientific research output, international cooperation, personnel training and information construction.