ABSTRACT
Objective@#To investigate the effect of the frenulum identification positioning method with a disposable suture device in circumcision for the prevention of postoperative penile frenulum malposition.@*METHODS@#Totally 212 patients with phimosis or redundant prepuce underwent circumcision from March 2015 to September 2016, including 109 cases of conventional circumcision (the control group) and 103 cases treated by frenulum identification positioning with a disposable suture device (the observation group). We observed the postoperative position of the penile frenulum and median raphe and compared the deviation angles of the frenulum between the two groups of patients.@*RESULTS@#The median of penile frenulum deviation angle (interquartile range) was 0 (3.56) in the observation group, significantly smaller than 12.41 (19.59) in the control (P <0.001, P = 0.000). And the rate of frenulum deviation was remarkably lower in the former (8.74% ［9/103］) than in the latter group (66.06% ［72/109］) (P <0.01).@*CONCLUSIONS@#Circumcision using the frenulum identification positioning method with a disposable suture device can effectively avoid postoperative penile frenulum malposition. With the advantages of safety and easy operation, it deserves clinical application and popularization.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Circumcision, Male , Methods , Disposable Equipment , Foreskin , General Surgery , Penis , General Surgery , Phimosis , General Surgery , Postoperative Complications , Suture Techniques , SuturesABSTRACT
This systematic review assessed the safety and efficacy of the disposable circumcision suture device (DCSD) and conventional circumcision (CC) in the treatment of redundant prepuce and phimosis. Two independent reviewers conducted a literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using the DCSD and CC for the treatment of redundant prepuce or phimosis in China and abroad. Nine RCTs (1898 cases) were included. Compared with the CC group, the DCSD group had a shorter operative time (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -21.44; 95% confidence intervals [95% CIs] [-25.08, -17.79]; P < 0.00001), shorter wound healing time (SMD = -3.66; 95% CI [-5.46, -1.85]; P < 0.0001), less intraoperative blood loss (SMD = -9.64; 95% CI [-11.37, -7.90]; P < 0.00001), better cosmetic penile appearance (odds ratio [OR] =8.77; 95% CI [5.90, 13.02]; P < 0.00001), lower intraoperative pain score, lower 24-h postoperative pain score, lower incidence of infection, less incision edema, and fewer adverse events. There were no differences between the CC and DCSD groups in the incidences of dehiscence, or hematoma. The results of this meta-analysis indicate that the DCSD appears to be safer and more effective than CC. However, additional high-quality RCTs with larger study populations are needed.
ABSTRACT
Objective The curative effect comparison of circumcision suture surgery and surgery foreskin cerclage ring.Methods Selection in our department from July 2013 to October 2016 were selected from children with phimosis or re-dundant prepuce in children with a total of 562 cases as the research object , randomly divided into control group (182 cases) and observation group (380 cases).The observation group using disposable circumcision suture treatment , the control group using prepuce ring resection in the treatment of patients , observe the operation effect , two postoperative pain and complica-tions.Results The observation group operation success rate ( 100%) was significantly higher than the control group (94.09%), observation group operation time , intraoperative bleeding volume , postoperative 24h pain scores were signifi-cantly less than the control group , the adverse reaction rate of observation group ( 6.32%) was significantly lower than the control group (11.54%),the differences between groups were significantly P<0.05.Conclusion Ircumcision surgery su-ture is better than that of ring foreskin cerclage surgery , more safe and reliable .
ABSTRACT
<p><b>Objective</b>To compare the clinical efficiency of Shang Ring with that of the disposable circumcision suture device (DCSD) in the treatment of phimosis or redundant prepuce.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From June 2013 to March 2015, we treated 320 patients with phimosis or redundant prepuce using Shang Ring (n=158) or DCSD (n=162). We compared the operation time, intra-operative blood loss, incision healing time, postoperative complications, postoperative satisfaction, and treatment cost between the two groups of patients.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Comparison between the Shang Ring and DCSD groups showed that the operation time was (5.6±1.3) vs (5.4±1.2) min, intra-operative blood loss (1.2±0.8) vs (1.3±0.9) ml, postoperative delayed hemorrhage 3.16% (5/158) vs 4.32% (7/162), incision healing time (16.1±7.2) vs (7.5±2.3) d, wound infection 15.82% (25/158) vs 7.41% (12/162), 1-month postoperative incision edema 29.11% (46/158) vs 9.26% (15/162), overall postoperative satisfaction rate 63.92% (101/158) vs 90.12% (146/162), and treatment cost (1121.2±15.6) vs (2142.6±10.8) RMB ¥. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in the latter five parameters (P<0.05 ), but not in the first three (P>0.05 ).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>The DSCD has an obvious superiority over Shang Ring for its relatively lower complication rate, shorter incision healing time, and better cosmetic appearance.</p>
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Blood Loss, Surgical , Circumcision, Male , Edema , Epidemiology , Operative Time , Penis , General Surgery , Personal Satisfaction , Phimosis , General Surgery , Postoperative Complications , Postoperative Hemorrhage , Postoperative Period , Prostheses and Implants , Surgical Wound , Pathology , SuturesABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the application efficacy of disposable circumcision stapler with compound lidocaine cream combined with lidocaine injection in the circumcision.Methods From September 2013 to November 2014,120 cases (11 cases of redundant prepuce phimosis patients), were divided into disposable circumcision suture group (S group, 60 cases) and conventional circumcision (T group, 60 eases) ,two groups had no statistically significant difference at patient age and wrapping case (6 cases phimosis of S group,5 cases phimosis of T group) (P ＞0.05.Patient's age ranged from 11 to 49 years.30 patients in each group were treated with lidocaine cream combined with lidocaine injection,and another 30 patients were treated with a local anesthetic lidocaine injection.Comparisons were conducted among the four groups on the operation time, anesthesia, intraoperative and postoperative pain score, blood loss and postoperative complications, postoperative appearance satisfaction, wound healing time.Results For the disposable circumcision stapler with lidocaine cream combined with lidocaine injection group, disposable circumcision stapler with lidocaine injection group, sleeve circumcision with lidocaine cream combined with lidocaine injection group and sleeve circumcision with lidocaine injection group, the operation time was (5.3 ± 1.5) min, (4.9 ± 1.4) min, (31.6 ± 3.4) min, (32.0 ± 3.3) min respectively, blood loss was (0.6 ± 0.4) ml, (0.8 ± 0.5) ml, (6.9 ± 2.4) ml, (7.5 ± 2.1) ml respectively, narcotic pain score was 0.6 ± 0.6,3.2 ±3.9,2.5 ± 1.0,0.5 ±0.6,intraoperative pain score was 0.8 ±0.9,1.4 ±0.8,2.2 ± 1.1,3.1 ± 1.1,postoperative 24 h pain score was 1.6 ±0.9,2.2 ±0.8,2.6 ± 1.3,4.4 ± 1.1, postoperative 48h pain score was 0.7 ±0.6,0.8 ±0.9,2.4 ±0.8,2.8 ±0.7, wound healing time was (13.7 ±1.5)d,(13.5 ± 1.7)d, (14.2 ± 1.3) d, (14.1 ± 1.6) d, the rate of postoperative complications was 6.6％ (2/30), 10.0％ (3/30),26.6％ (8/30), 33.4％ (10/30), satisfaction rate of appearance was 93.4％ (28/30), 96.7％ (29/30),70.4％ (22/30), 80.0％ (24/30).Compared with sleeve circumcision with lidocain injection group,disposable circumcision stapler with lidocaine cream combined with lidocaine injection had a shorter operation time, less pain, less bleeding, higher appearance satisfaction rate and lower incidence of complications (P ＜ 0.05), wound healing time had no significant difference (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion Application of the disposable circumcision stapler with lidocaine cream combined with lidocaine injection on circumcision is safe and has got better clinical outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Objective To discuss cause and treatment measures of the postoperative failed to fully automatic nail in patients with circumcision by disposable circumcision suture device, so as to improve the quality of the circumcision.Methods 182 cases received circumcision by disposable circumcision suture device were randomly selected from September 2014 to March 2015 in the hospital and divided into control group ( n =86 ) and treatment group (n=96).All the patients received oral antibiotics for three days conventionally.Patients in control group were dressing with 0.1%iodine after treatment, dressing change every two or three days, while the treatment group soaking with 30 mL to 40 mL compound prescription cortex phellodendri chinensis fluid for 15 min two times per day.The postoperative wound anastomosis nail loss effect in two groups were compared.Results The time of complete nail loss in patients soaking with compound prescription cortex phellodendri chinensis fluid was significantly shorter than that in patients dressing with 0.1% iodine (P<0.05), but there was no significantly difference of the first time to lose nail between two groups.The rate of complete nail loss in treatment group was 94 cases (97.9%), which was significantly higher than 68 cases (79.1%) in control group (χ2 =16.47,P<0.05). The adverse reactions were mild of two groups.Conclusion The compound prescription cortex phellodendri chinensis fluid has exact effect on postoperative wound anastomosis nail loss and recovery in patients’ with circumcision by disposable circumcision suture device.