ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To Study the dosimetric advantage of the Jaw tracking technique in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for Head and Neck Cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively selected 10 previously treated head and neck cancer patients stage (T1/T2, N1, M0) in this study. All the patients were planned for IMRT and VMAT with simultaneous integrated boost technique. IMRT and VMAT plans were performed with jaw tracking (JT) and with static jaw (SJ) technique by keeping the same constraints and priorities for a particular patient. Target conformity, dose to the critical structures and low dose volumes were recorded and analyzed for IMRT and VMAT plans with and without JT for all the patients. RESULTS: The conformity index average of all patients followed by standard deviation (x¯±σ(x¯)) of the JT-IMRT, SJ-IMRT, JT-VMAT, and SJ-VMAT were 1.72 ± 0.56, 1.67 ± 0.57, 1.83 ± 0.65, and 1.85 ± 0.64, and homogeneity index were 0.059 ± 0.05, 0.064 ± 0.05, 0.064 ± 0.04, and 0.064 ± 0.05. JT-IMRT shows significant mean reduction in right parotid and left parotid shows of 7.64% (p < 0.001) and 7.45% (p < 0.001) compare to SJ-IMRT. JT-IMRT plans also shows considerable dose reduction to thyroid, inferior constrictors, spinal cord and brainstem compared to the SJ-IMRT plans. CONCLUSION: Significant dose reductions were observed for critical structure in the JT-IMRT compared to SJ-IMRT technique. In JT-VMAT plans dose reduction to the critical structure were not significant compared to the SJ-IMRT due to relatively lesser monitor units.
Subject(s)
Humans , Brain Stem , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Head , Jaw , Neck , Radiotherapy , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Cord , Thyroid GlandABSTRACT
Objective To compare the dosimetric differences of target and organs at risk (OAR) induced by the tangential and non-coplanar multi-fields used in the dynamic intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans for breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery.Methods Forty patients with early-stage left breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery were included.Based on the CT anatomy of the same patient,dynamic IMRT treatment plans using two tangential fields,3,4 and 5 non-coplanar fields were designed respectively utilizing the same optimization objects.The plans were compared by means of target dose distribution,the doses and irradiated volumes of heat,left lung,right breast,and total monitor units (MUs).Results The conformal index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI) of planning target volume (PTV) in the plans using 4 and 5 fields were better than that using 2 fields (P ＜ 0.05).Maximum doses (Dmax) in PTV were significantly lower in the plans of 4 and 5 fields than of 2 fields (P ＜0.05).Yet the plans of 4 and 5 fields generated significant higher minimum doses (Dmin) in PTV than that of 2 fields (P ＜ 0.05).No significant difference was observed between plans of 2 or 3 fields.Across the four plans,the differences of right breast V5 (relative volume acquired at least 5 Gy of dose),heart V30,heart mean dose (D),left lung V20,V5 and D were not significant.Yet the disparities of total MUs were statistically significant (F =25.63,P ＜ 0.05).The least MUs were used by the 2 fields and the most MUs were observed in the 5-field plans.Conclusions Comparing with IMRT plans of 2 fields,using 4 or 5 non-coplanar fields can improve the target dose distribution without increasing OAR doses.As a tradeoff,more MUs are needed for multi-fields plans.
ABSTRACT
Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy(3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT) are becoming important parts for research of treatment in esophageal carcinoma patients.The advances of dosimetric study in 3D-CRT,IMRT of esophageal carcinoma and the evaluation indices are reviewed.