Uso de pericardio humano en neurocirugía / Use of human pericardium in neurosurgical practice

Objetivo. Describir y analizar una serie de pacientes operados en nuestro servicio por diferentes patologías, en los cuales se utilizó pericardio de donante no vivo para la realización de la duroplastía, obtenido del Banco de Tejidos de nuestro Hospital. Material y método. Se realizó un análisis retrospectivo de las historias clínicas de 33 pacientes en los cuales se utilizó pericardio humano, operados entre los años 2006 y 2008. Resultados. La edad de los pacientes fue entre 1 mes y 19 años (promedio: 6,6 años). 17 masculinos, 16 femeninos. Las cirugías en las cuales se utilizó, por diferentes motivos, pericardio humano para el cierre de la duramadre fueron: 7 cirugías por tumores de fosa posterior, 6 por tumores supratentoriales, 5 por traumatismos encefalocraneanos, 3 por malformación de Arnold-Chiari, 3 por hematomas espontáneos, 2 por malformaciones arteriovenosas, 2 por lipomas lumbosacros, 2 por encefaloceles, 1 por cirugía de la epilepsia, 1 por tumor espinal, y 1 por tumor de tronco. Las complicaciones encontradas fueron: 2 pseudomeningoceles y 1 fístula de líquido cefalorraquídeo, las que se resolvieron sin necesidad de nueva intervención quirúrgica. No se presentaron infecciones de la herida quirúrgica ni rechazo del injerto. Follow up: 18,6 meses. Conclusión. Consideramos que este material se comporta en forma excelente como sustituto de la duramadre, presentando ventajas tales como: ser impermeable, fácil de suturar y manejar, proporcionando un sellado hermético, baja antigenicidad y no inducir reacciones a cuerpo extraño.

Objective. To describe and to analyze a series of patients operated in our service by different pathologies, in which we used pericardium of alive donor for dural closure, stored at 80°Cbelow cero in our hospital. Method. A retrospective analysis was designed to evaluate the medical records of 33 patients in which human pericardiumwere used, in a period of time between 2006 and 2008. Results. The age of the patients ranged from 1 month to 19years old (average age: 6.6). 17 were male and 16 female. The surgeries in which we used, by different reasons, human pericardium for dural closure were: 7 posterior fossa tumors, 6supratentorial tumors, 5 traumatic brain injury (intracranial hypertension), 3 Arnold-Chiari malformations, 3 spontaneous haematomas, 2 arterio-venous malformations, 2 lumbo-sacrallipomas, 2 encephaloceles, 1 surgery for epilepsy, 1 spinal cord tumor, and 1 brainstem tumor. The complications found were: 2 pseudomeningoceles and 1 CSF fistula. There were no systemicallergic reactions or local skin changes or infections. Follow up: 18.6 months.Conclusion. We considered that human pericardium is an excellent, effective and safe cranial and spinal dural substitute, presenting advantages such as: to be impermeable, easy tosuture and to handle, providing hermetic sealing, low antigenicidadand not to induce reactions to strange body.

Clinical observations of duraplasty using synthetic dural substitute or autologous fascia lata for treating Chiari I malformation complicated with syringomyelia / 中国微创外科杂志

Objective To evaluate the curative effects and complications of synthetic dural substitute (Neuro-Patch) in the surgical treatment of Chiari type I malformation (CMI) complicated with syringomyelia (SM). Methods .Forty patients suffered from CMI with SM were given foramen magnum decompression and duraplasty between June 2002 and June 2004. The duraplasty was performed using either synthetic dural substitute (Neuro-Patch Group, n=20) or autologous fascia lata (Autologous Group, n= 20). Results .Symptoms were improved in 17 patients in both of groups (85.0%) at 6 months postoperatively, and no deterioration of symptoms was seen. Postoperative pyrexia occurred in 12 patients in the Neuro-Patch Group (60.0%) and 9 patients in the Autologous Group (45.0%), without significant differences (?2=0.902,P=0.342). No statistically significant differences were observed between the Neuro-Patch Group and the Autologous Group in the operating time (3.6?0.7 h vs. 3.4?0.4 h; t=1.109,P=0.274), the time to the onset of postoperative pyrexia (7.3?3.4 d vs. 9.4?2.5 d;t=-1.560,P=0.135), the length of duration of postoperative pyrexia (range, 1~19 d vs. 1~8 d, median, 4.5 d vs. 2 d;z=-1.643,P=0.100), the drainage time (1.3?0.5 d vs. 1.2?0.4 d; t=0.230, P=0.820), the drainage volume (range, 15~300 ml vs. 20~250 ml, median, 80 ml vs. 37.5 ml; z=-1.359,P=0.174), the duration of antibiotic administration (15.8?4.8 d vs. 13.7?1.5 d;t=1.260,P=0.223), and the assessment outcomes of curative effects. The length of duration of hormone requirement was longer in the Neuro-Patch Group (12.8?4.1 d) than in the Autologous Group (7.8?3.1 d) (t=3.055, P=0.007). On MRI examinations at 6 postoperative months, no posterior cranial fossa effusion was detected in both of groups. Follow-up checkups for 9 months ~ 2 years in the 40 patients showed delayed infectious granuloma on the wound in 1 patient in the Autologous Group, which was cured by debridement. Conclusions .The Neuro-Patch is a reliable dural substitute for repairing of dural defects in the treatment of CMI associated with syringomyelia.

Experimental Trial for the Prevention of Adhesion with Dural Substitutes in Craniectomy State

In a series of rabbits, two craniectomies were made in both side of the parietal hone. Each lesion was filled with gelfoam, lyocura, fat and dural film. Five rabbits were left empty as a control group. The animals were killed in one month after the operation. The degree of adhesion between the soft tissue of the scalp and various dural substitute was evaluated at the time of operative dissection and studied histopathologically. The results were as follows. 1) The insertion of dural substituted substances can prevent the adhesion between the scalp and dura mater. 2) The dural film was most effective in prevention of adhesion. 3) The dural film inserted group exhibited inflammatory reaction. 4) The gelfoam, lyodura and fat inserted groups were though to have had a moderate prevention effect of adhesion. With these results, we could conclude that the insertion of material between the dura and scalp can prevent adhesion. However the ideal inserted material which can pevent inflammatory reaction and adhesion has not been determined. At this point we have not found and ideal substitute. To get an ideal material for prevention of adhesion, further intensive study is required.