ABSTRACT
Objective@#The study was performed to assess and compare the effect of early (≤ 72 hours) and late (>72 hours) laparoscopic cholecystectomy after Endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography (ERCP) in terms of duration of operation, conversion to open cholecystectomy, intraoperative complicating factors, duration of hospital stay from the date of ERCP, hospital expenses, and presence of postoperative complications.@*Methods@#This is a retrospective study from 2010 up to July 2019. Outcomes (duration of operation, rate of conversion, intraoperative complicating factors, length of hospital stay, hospital expenses and post-operative complications) were compared between patients who had ERCP then cholecystectomy within 72 hours (Early Group) and those who had ERCP then cholecystectomy after more than 72 hours (Late Group). @*Results@#A total of 19 patients were included in this study. There were 10 patients in the Early Group and 9 in the Late Group. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy after ERCP had a shorter statistically significant duration of hospital. Shorter operative time, fewer intraoperative complicating factors, no conversion to open cholecystectomy, cheaper hospital expenses and no post-operative complications were also noted in the Early Group as compared to the Late Group.@*Conclusion@#Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and results in a shorter hospital stay compared to late laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Subject(s)
Choledocholithiasis , CholecystolithiasisABSTRACT
Background: This prospective randomized study was undertaken to to assess the outcomes of early versus delayed cholecystectomy for patient’s acute cholecystitis.Methods: 70 patients with acute cholecystitis were prospectively randomized to either an early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n=35) or a delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy group (n=35). The mean operative time, conversion rate, total hospital stay, intra-operative and post-operative complications, average hospital cost were evaluated between the two groups.Results: A total of 70 patients were enrolled, 35 patients in each group. There was no significant difference in the conversion rates (early, 8.57% vs delayed, 5.71%) and postoperative complications (early, 25% vs delayed, 20%). At the cost of an increased operating time (early, 81 minutes vs delayed, 78 minutes) and blood loss (early, 180.33ml vs delayed, 108.00 ml), early laparoscopic cholecytectomy significantly shortened the total hospital stay (early, 1.5 days vs. delayed, 7.95 days) and average hospital cost (early 9240 INR vs delayed, 12251 INR).Conclusions: The safety and efficacy of early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis were comparable in terms of morality, morbidity and conversion rate. However early laparoscopic cholecystectomy allows significantly shorter total hospital stay and reduction in days away from work at the cost of longer operating time and blood loss and offers definitive treatment at initial admission. Moreover it avoids repeated admissions for recurrent symptoms has both medical as well as socioeconomic benefits and should be the preferred approach for patients managed by surgeons with adequate experience in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
ABSTRACT
Acute cholecystitis (AC) is a potentially life-threatening condition. AC was initially considered to be a relative contraindication for laparoscopic 1 cholecystectomy (LC), but with increase in general expertise, early LC was recommended in selected patients . Aprospective study of LC in grade 1 and 2 AC patients with mild to moderate inflammatory changes in the gallbladder and no significant organ dysfunction, was performed during October 2016 to July 2019. A total of 78 patients, out of 408 cholecystectomies performed during this period, were included in this study. Criteria for diagnosing AC was, recent onset of pain in right hypochondrium, fever, leucocytosis, pericholecystic fluid collections, subserosal oedema on ultrasound, pyocele and other pathological evidence of AC. Patients presented and operated within 4 days of onset of symptoms showed better results as compared to those who could be operated after 4 days and within 14 days. Five patients required conversion to open cholecystectomy because of complex adhesions in 2, critical view of safety was unachievable in 2 and in 1 for troublesome bleeding.
ABSTRACT
Introducción: La colecistectomía laparoscópica precoz es nuestra conducta para el tratamiento de la colecistitis aguda; sin embargo, la consulta tardía y el tratamiento postergado por dificultades de acceso hacen que el tiempo de resolución muchas veces sobrepase los 7 días de iniciados los síntomas. Nuestro objetivo es comparar los resultados quirúrgicos entre los pacientes operados antes y después de este periodo. Material y métodos: Serie de casos consecutivos de pacientes con diagnóstico de colecistitis aguda operados entre junio de 2013 y diciembre de 2014 en el Servicio de Cirugía del Hospital de Coquimbo. De 358 casos, se excluyen aquellos asociados a colangitis, pancreatitis aguda, ASA ≥ 4 y cuadro mayor de 30 días. Consecuentemente se incluyen 233 pacientes que se dividen en «grupo precoz¼ (GP), operados antes del séptimo día de iniciados los síntomas, y «grupo tardío¼ (GT), operados después de este periodo. Se analizan la presentación de la serie y la asociación entre variables cualitativas y cuantitativas mediante la prueba de χ² y t de Student, respectivamente. Resultados: El GP presenta una estadía hospitalaria de 3,9 (± 2,0) días y el GT de 7,2 (± 5,2), (p = 0,0001); el periodo postoperatorio es de 1,9 (± 1,6) y de 2,9 (± 4,4) días, respectivamente (p = 0,055). La tasa de conversión en el GP es del 2,1% y en el GT del 9,7% (p = 0,027); la tasa global de complicaciones postoperatorias es del 3,2 y 10,7%, respectivamente (p = 0,033). Discusión: Nuestros resultados respaldan la colecistectomía precoz en pacientes con colecistitis aguda. Se pone de manifiesto un problema de gestión, en que la postergación de la resolución quirúrgica empeora los resultados y conlleva mayor riesgo de complicaciones.
Introduction: The treatment for acute Cholecystitis should be an early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. However, this resolution often exceed 7 days after the clinical symptoms onset. Mainly, for delayed consultation of the patients, access difficulties and delayed surgical resolution in our hospital. The aim is compare the surgical outcomes of patients that have had a Cholecystectomy before 7 days after the clinical symptoms onset with those operated after this period. Material and methods: Between June 2013 and December 2014, 358 patients were Cholecystectomy for acute Cholecystitis at the Hospital of Coquimbo. Those associated to Cholangitis, Acute Pancreatitis, ASA ≥ 4 and Gallbladder Cancer, were excluded; 233 patients were included. They were allocated into two groups according to the treatment timeframe: ‘Early Group’ (EG) for those operated before the seventh day of symptoms onset and ‘Late Group’ (LG) for those operated after this period. A retrospective study was used to collect data demographics, clinical and surgical outcomes. All these factors were compared between the two groups. Results: The EG had a hospital stay of 3.9 (± 2.0) days and the LG 7.2 (± 5.2) (P = .0001); the postoperative stay was 1.9 (± 1.6) and 2.9 (± 4.4) (P = .055) days, respectively. The conversion rate in the EG was 2.1% and 9.7% in the LT (P = .027); the overall rate of postoperative complications was 3.2% and 10.7% (P = .033), respectively. Conclusions: The findings support an early Cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis. There is a management problem in terms of delayed surgical resolution which worsens surgical outcomes and increase morbidity.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/methods , Cholecystitis, Acute/surgery , Time-to-Treatment , Analysis of Variance , Length of Stay , Postoperative ComplicationsABSTRACT
BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: In the treatment of complicated cholecystitis, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has limited efficacy due to its substantial post-operative complications. In addition, the clinical characteristics of complicated cholecystitis (CC) patients were suspected as advanced age with highly risky comorbidity. Percutaneous transhepatic gall bladder (PTGBD) drainage could be an alternative option for successful LC. Hence, this study evaluated the outcome of PTGBD for CC within and after 5 days. METHODS: The medical records of 109 consecutive CC patients who had undergone an LC between January 2007 and December 2011 were retrospectively reviewed and compared with the medical records of CC patients who had undergone an LC within 72 hours of (group I, n=63) or 5 days after PTGBD (group II, n=40). In addition, group I was divided into group Ia (n=46) and group Ib (n=17), according to the patients' development of open-conversion or post-operative complications. The clinical outcomes of the four groups were analyzed. RESULTS: There was a significantly higher reference to age, the ASA score grading, and predominant comorbidities in group II than in group I. The peri-operative results of group II showed lower blood loss and relatively shorter operating times than those of group I. In the cases of early LC within 72 hours (group Ia vs. group Ib), the difference was statistically insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: The delayed LC after PTGBD for complicated cholecystitis with high clinical risk had better results in this study, although it prolonged the patient's hospital stay.
Subject(s)
Humans , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Cholecystitis , Cholecystitis, Acute , Comorbidity , Drainage , Gallbladder , Length of Stay , Medical Records , Retrospective Studies , Urinary BladderABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Operative management of acute cholecystitis in aged patients has been shown to have relatively higher morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine appropriate management protocols for acute cholecystitis in those more than 70 years old. METHODS: From May 2003 to Dec 2009, we performed this study of patients over 70 years old that were diagnosed with acute cholecystitis (n=257). We excluded patients that had a hepatobilliary malignancy, a previous laparotomy history, secondary cholecystitis, or a high operative risk factor (n=78). Eligible participants were divided into two groups according to the first management of acute cholecystitis. One hundred two of the 179 (group A) had undergone a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) or open cholecystectomy (OC) within 48 hr after arriving at the emergency room; 77 of the 179 (group 2) had PTGBD done as the first management protocol. We divided group 2 into group C (n=47) and D (n=30) according to cholecystectomy or not. We compared clinical outcomes of the two groups. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 77.5 years old (102 for Group A and 77 for Group B. Univariant analysis of pre-operative clinical findings between groups A and B showed a significant difference only in age and in type of acute cholecystitis, However, the pre-operative co-morbidity of group B was significantly higher than that for group A. Comparing postoperative results between groups A and C, postoperative complications, open conversion rate, and mortality after cholecystectomy were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: PTGBD could be considered as appropriate management in aged patients with acute cholecystitis. Moreover, PTGBD can reduce unnecessary cholecytectomies.