ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the influence of different size related parameters of common CT scanned body parts on body-specific dose estimate (SSDE) , in order to establish rapid conversion factors for SSDE.Methods:A total of 189 clinical cases were collected from 6 common CT scanned body parts, including head, nasal bone, sinus, neck, chest, abdomen and pelvis, at Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University from March 8 to May 10, 2021. Batch-processing of image was carried out by using Matlabcode. The axial images′area, anteroposterior (AP) dimension, lateral (LAT) dimension and average CT values were calculated. The conversion factors for estimating body-specific dose values were obtained from the real effective diameter ( De) and water equivalent diameter ( Dw) of the clinical cases, and the differences in values were compared between SSDE ED and SSDE WED. Based on the information on AP, LAT, AP + LAT, estimated De, the real De and Dw obtained in clinical practices, the SSDE rapid correction factors for adult body parts were established. The convenient conversion relation between Dw and De was obtained. Based on the correction factors for Dw, the relative errors of the correction factors for various sizes related parameters were compared. Results:The SSDE fast conversion factors for the real De of the 6 body parts were 1.01, 1.01, 1.01, 0.97, 1.28, 1.32, and those for Dw were 0.87, 0.97, 0.98, 0.99, 1.42, 1.36, respectively. The relative errors of different conversion factors ranged from 0.68% to 18.05%. The conversion factors for abdomen and pelvis had the smallest difference, and those for AP and LAT of the chest had the smallest error. The differences between CTDI vol, SSDE ED and SSDE WED in sinus, chest and abdomen were statistically significant ( tsinus=2.44, 4.23, tchest=17.67, 17.00, tabdomen and pelvis =17.93, 18.75, P<0.05) . The differences between CTDI vol and SSDE WED in head, nasal bone, were statistically significant ( t=-22.27, 2.80, P<0.05) , but not with SSDE ED ( P>0.05) . The difference between CTDI vol and SSDE ED in neck was statistically significant ( t=-3.06, P<0.05) but without statistical insignificance in camparison with SSDE WED ( P>0.05) . Conclusions:SSDE WED can be used to accurately evaluate the body-specific dose estimatates, and different size related parameters can be selected for correction in different scanned body parts. The rapid conversion factor can be easily used in clinical practice to improve the accuracy of estimated radiation dose.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To compare and quantify the differences in size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) obtained by effective diameter and water-equivalent diameter from the central slice of the scan range in head CT examination.@*Methods@#A total of 111 consecutive adult patients who underwent head CT examination were enrolled in this study. All of CTDIvol values in the dose report were documented. The dataset was assigned into group A and group B, based on the individual size-dependent conversion factors (f) of effective diameter (deff) and water-equivalent diameter (dw) at the central slice multiplied by normalized volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol ) respectively. Body size, f and SSDE were calculated. With SSDEgross served as the reference level, the performance of SSDEdeff and SSDEdw was evaluated.@*Results@#Statistically significant differences were found in body size (t=47.587, P<0.05) and f(z=-9.242, P<0.05) between group A and group B. Statistically significant difference also existed in SSDE (t=-46.687, P<0.05), (56.20±2.66) and (53.49±2.48) mGy for group A and group B respectively. Strongly positive correlation was shown in body size (r=0.873, R2 =0.761) and SSDE (r=0.974, R2 =0.949) between group A and group B(all P<0.05). Positive correlation was also found between SSDEdeff and SSDEgross(r=0.900, R2 =0.809), SSDEdw and SSDEgross (r=0.904, R2 =0.817, all P<0.05). Mean absolute difference was 2.34 and 0.78 mGy, for SSDEdeff vs. SSDEgross and SSDEdw vs. SSDEgross respectively; mean absolute relative difference was 4.38%, 1.40%; root mean square difference was 1.17 mGy (2.17%), 1.06 mGy (1.91%). Interquartile range and full range of SSDEdeff and SSDEdw were 3.22 vs. 2.39 mGy, 13.65 vs. 12.48mGy, respectively. A less degree of variation was observed in SSDEdw than that in SSDEdeff.@*Conclusions@#SSDEdw values based on the water-equivalent diameter at the central slice of the scan range got better agreement with those derived from all slices, which could serve as a simpler and more valid indicator to represent the average value of size-specific dose estimates of the whole scan range in head CT examination.
ABSTRACT
Abstract. In order to have a more accurate estimation of the dose delivered for computed tomography (CT) studies, and given that the current dose estimates do not include the size of the patient, a retrospective study was conducted on a sample of 388 patients from the radiology department of a general hospital, to make a better assessment of the dose delivered for CT scans of the chest, abdomen and pelvis in adult and paediatric patients. A comparison was made between the volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) delivered by the scanner and CTDIvol value corrected by the incorporation of the effective patient diameter according to the report 204 of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). It was found that the values of CTDIvol vary in all cases when the patient size parameter is included, with this variation being greater as sizes go to extremes.
Resumen. Con el objetivo de tener una estimación de dosis más exacta entregada por los estudios de tomografía computarizada (TC) y dado que los estimadores de dosis actuales no incluyen el tamaño del paciente en la estimación, se realizó un estudio retrospectivo en una muestra de 388 pacientes de un servicio de radiología de un hospital general, para calcular las dosis entregadas en exámenes de TC de tórax, abdomen y pelvis en pacientes adultos y pediátricos. Se elaboró y realizó una comparación entre el índice de dosis de TC (CTDI VOL) entregado por el equipo y el CTDI VOL corregido mediante la incorporación del parámetro del diámetro efectivo del paciente según el reporte 204 de la Asociación Americana de Físicos Médicos (AAPM). Se pudo comprobar que los valores de CTDI VOL varían en la totalidad de los casos al ingresar el parámetro de tamaño del paciente y que esta variación es mayor a medida que los tamaños se van a los extremos.
Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Adult , Radiation Dosage , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/standards , Retrospective Studies , Phantoms, ImagingABSTRACT
Background: Dilating the pupil is one of the most commonly practiced methods among ophthalmologists to examine the eye especially the posterior segment of the eye. Here we conducted a study to know the clinical effect of proparacaine, a local anesthetic, on tropicamide-induced pupillary dilation. Methods: A Quasi-experimental study was conducted on 57 subjects aged between 20 and 70 years. Study was done over a period of 3 months (February 14 - April 14) at a tertiary health care center in Bagalkot after obtaining institutional ethical committee clearance. Proparacaine was instilled in one eye (right eye) before instilling tropicamide and the other eye with a placebo (normal saline). Pupil diameter was measured using a pupillary gauge at 0, 15, and 30 mins. Results were analyzed using unpaired Student’s t-test. Results: The mean clinically efficient pupillary diameter at the end of 15 mins in proparacaine instilled eye was 5.56±0.5 and in control eye was 5.25±0.45 mm with t value 8.13 (p<0.001) which was statistically significant. And at the end of 30 mins pupillary diameter in the study group was 7.96±0.43 mm and in the control group was 7.83±0.43 mm with t value of 4.115 (p<0.001) which was also statistically significant. Conclusions: Therefore, we do recommend the use of proparacaine before instilling tropicamide for faster pupillary dilation.