ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND@#Inversion ankle sprains are among the most common traumatic injuries for both men and women caused by jumping and landing activities. The ankle is protected by the static and dynamic stabilizers to reduce the incidences of injuries. Furthermore, using a non-elastic closedbasket weave taping technique is one of the common interventions to prevent it. Knowledge about the muscle activity reaction of the dynamic stabilizers upon application of tape is limited with varying results.@*OBJECTIVES@#To determine the effect of non-elastic closed-basket weave ankle taping on the muscle activity of tibialis anterior, peroneus longus, medial, and lateral gastrocnemius on healthy individuals during jump landing on a hard, flat surface.@*METHODS@#This study is a quasi-experimental study using a pre- and post-test design. Peak amplitude muscle activity was assessed and analyzed using surface electromyography (sEMG) after landing from a jump. The pre-test was done by jump landing without tape, after which post-test data was immediately collected after applying the non-elastic closed-basket weave taping. Jump landing was done for three trials for both pre- and post-tests. A paired t-test was used to determine significant differences in pre-post taping.@*RESULTS@#Fifteen healthy participants were included in the study (9 females, 6 males) with a mean age of 21 + 1.03 years old and BMI of 22.74 + 1.63 kg/m2. No significant difference was observed on peak amplitude muscle activity of the tibialis anterior (p= 0.06), medial gastrocnemius (p= 0.32), and lateral gastrocnemius (p= 0.66) after application of tape. However, a significant difference was observed in the peroneus longus after the application of tape (p= 0.05) during jump landing@*CONCLUSION@#Non-elastic closed-basket weave taping decreased the peak amplitude muscle activity of the peroneus longus during jump landing. This research suggests that tape may influence the peroneus longus, and it may or may not be detrimental in reducing the risk of ankle sprains.
Subject(s)
ElectromyographyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to confirm the immediate effect of wrist joint mobilization with taping on the range of motion, grip strength, and spasticity. METHODS: Thirty stroke patients were randomly divided into two groups: the joint mobilization with taping group (n=15) and a taping group (n=15). For measurement of spasticity and joint range of motion, the modified Tardieu scale, active and passive range of motion of wrist flexion, as well as extension were measured by the Rapael smart glove, and for grip strength measurement, grip dynamometer was performed. RESULTS: The experimental group showed a significant improvement in the range of motion, grip strength, and spasticity after 10 minutes of taping (p0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The study found that wrist joint mobilization with taping has an immediate effect on wrist range of motion, grip strength, and spasticity in stroke patients, whereas it was not effective in the control group with just taping. The long-term change still needs to be evaluated, when taking into consideration of the carryover effect.
Subject(s)
Humans , Hand Strength , Joints , Muscle Spasticity , Range of Motion, Articular , Stroke , Wrist Joint , WristABSTRACT
Taping is widely used by sports trainers to prevent injury and to protect affected sites post-injury. However, it is not clear whether taping affect the perception of somatosensory stimulation. We sought to clarify the effect of taping on somatosensory stimulation using somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). We recorded SEPs following transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the right medial forearm in ten healthy volunteers. SEPs were recorded from 9 electrodes on the scalp under control, elastic-taping and white-taping conditions. Subjects relaxed on a comfortable reclining seat without taping in the control condition, while they were subjected to taping along the muscle of forearm with tension (elastic-taping) and without tension (white-taping) in the taping conditions. Results showed that the peak amplitude of N140 did not differ significantly among the three conditions but the peak amplitude of P250 was significantly lower in the elastic-taping condition than control and white-taping conditions. Elastic-taping with tension along the muscles changes various afferent inputs from muscle spindle or skin, and this may affect the perception of somatosensory stimulation.