Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
China Occupational Medicine ; (6): 632-639, 2023.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-1013299

ABSTRACT

{L-End}Objective To explore the suitable methods for individual occupational stress examination and evaluation for workers in China based on the electronics industry. {L-End}Methods A total of 1 164 workers from four electronics enterprises in Beijing City were selected as the research subjects using a convenient sampling method. The Occupational Stress Measurement Scale, which was developed based on the Japanese Brief Job Stress Questionnaire, was used to assess the occupational stress of the research subjects, and test the reliability and validity of the scale. Percentile norms and T-score norms were established, and the T-scores of the three dimensions of stress reaction (psychological reaction and physical symptoms), stress factors, and social support were divided into five stages using the normal distribution method with x¯±0.5 s and x¯±1.5 s, which was used to explore a proposed standard for assessing individual stress levels. {L-End}Results The revised scale consisted of 57 items, which could explain 64.0% of the total variation of occupational stress based on the result of item analysis and exploratory factor analysis. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model fitted well, with root mean square error of approximation of 0.052, standardized root mean square residual of 0.070, comparative fit index of 0.960, and Tucker-Lewis index of 0.958. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.951, and the Spearman-Brown coefficient was 0.837. Cronbach's α coefficients of the three dimensions ranged from 0.794 to 0.952, and the Spearman-Brown coefficients ranged from 0.737 to 0.850. The scores of the three dimensions of stress reaction, stress factors, and social support were (49.1±13.0), (44.9±7.7), and (18.1±3.6), respectively. Workers in the electronics industry met one of the following items were identified as the high level of occupational stress individuals: i) a score of stress reaction dimension ≥72.0 points; ii) a sum of stress factor and social support dimension scores ≥81.0 points, and a stress reaction dimension score ≥58.0 points. {L-End}Conclusion The Occupational Stress Measurement Scale and the criteria for determining high level of occupational stress can be used to assess the individual occupational stress levels of workers in the electronics industry in China. This method can provide a theoretical basis for the formulation of occupational stress examination and assessment for Chinese workers.

2.
China Occupational Medicine ; (6): 691-700, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-881955

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the applicability of two risk assessment methods to assess the occupational health risk of key industries of dichloromethane in Shenzhen City. METHODS: The Singapore ministry of manpower risk(MOM) method and the comprehensive index method were used to evaluate the risk of 123 positions in 47 key industries of dichloromethane in Shenzhen City. Then the risk classification results of the two assessment methods were compared. RESULTS: The results of MOM method showed that the median and the 0 th to 100 th percentile [M(P_0-P_(100))] of risk of dichloromethane in electronics industry was 2(2-3), and the risk level was low to medium. The M(P_0-P_(100)) of risk of dichloromethane in printing industry was 2(2-4), and the risk level was low to high. The results of the comprehensive index method showed that the M(P_0-P_(100)) of risk of dichloromethane in electronics industry and printing industry were 3(3-4), and the risk level was medium to high. There was no significant difference in the assessment results of occupational health risk of dichloromethane between the electronic industry and the printing industry by MOM evaluation method(P>0.05). The occupational health risk assessment of dichloromethane in printing industry was higher than that in electronic industry by the comprehensive index method(P<0.01). Both evaluation methods were not consistent in the electronics industry and the printing industry(k values were-0.01 and 0.04, all P>0.05). After merging the evaluation results of the two industries, there was no consistency in the evaluation results of the two evaluation methods(k value=0.01, P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The risk level of dichloromethane in printing industry is higher than that in printing industry in Shenzhen City. The comprehensive index method may comprehensively and objectively assess the occupational health risk level of dichloromethane in key industries in Shenzhen City.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL