ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE@#To evaluate the efficacy and prognosis of double button plate combined with strengthened anchor technique and clavicular hook plate internal fixation for complete acromioclavicular joint dislocation.@*METHODS@#From July 2017 to September 2020, a total of 42 patients with acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated by surgery were choosen as study objects and divided into observation group (21 cases) and control group (21 cases). In the observation group, there were 14 males and 7 females, aged 21 to 63 years old, with an average of (45.05±8.70) years old. In the control group, there were 16 males and 5 females, aged 25 to 68 years old, with an average of(45.00±9.44) years old. The patients in the observation group were treated with double button plate combined with strengthened anchor technique, whereas those in the control group received clavicular hook plate internal fixation. The two groups were compared in terms of operating time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, shoulder pain(visual analogue scale, VAS) score, shoulder function Constant-Murley score and postoperative complications.@*RESULTS@#There was no significant difference between the two groups in intraoperative blood loss or postoperative hospital stay(P>0.05). The operating time of double button plate combined with strengthened anchor technique group (65.24±5.36) min was significantly longer than that of the clavicular hook plate group (48.81±4.72) min, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in shoulder function or pain degree between the two groups before operation (P>0.05). After 1 month, 3 months and 6 months, the Constant-Murley score of the observation group was 73.29±2.15, 85.43±1.47, 93.86±1.24 separately, which were significantly higher than those of the control group;and the VAS score was 2.76±0.62, 1.71±0.64, 0.57±0.51 separately, which were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). One instance of shoulder discomfort was found in the observation group, while 5 cases of shoulder pain, 2 cases of restricted shoulder mobility, and 1 case of subacromial bone absorption were found in the control group. In both group, there was no loss of reduction.@*CONCLUSION@#In the treatment of complete acromioclavicular joint dislocation double button plate combined with strengthened anchor technique achieves favorable clinical result. Internal fixation does not need to be removed. The recovery of shoulder joint function and pain relief are superior than clavicular hook plate internal fixation, which is more worthy of clinical promotion.
Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Acromioclavicular Joint/surgery , Bone Plates , Clavicle/surgery , Shoulder Dislocation/surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Because the double Endobutton plate has more advantages than the clavicle hook plate in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation, and the trauma is small; it does not need to be removed through secondary surgery. Thus, it has been widely used in clinical practice in recent years. Meta-analysis was used to investigate whether there were differences in the treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation between double Endobutton plate and clavicle hook plate so as to provide effective guidance for clinical treatment. METHODS: The database Cochrane library, PubMed, EBSCO, CNKI, VIP and Wanfang were searched from the database inception to January 2020. All the literatures related to the treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation with double Endobutton plate and clavicle hook plate were collected. The literatures were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria to extract the data and to carry out the relevant analysis. The literatures that meet the requirements were screened out. The quality of the selected relevant literatures was assessed. All outcome indicators were analyzed by RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS: (1) A total of 38 articles were included, and the total number of cases was 2 199, of which 1 035 cases were in the double Endobutton plate group and 1 164 cases were in the clavicle hook plate group. (2) The results showed that the double Endobutton plate group was superior to the clavicle hook plate group in the excellent and good rate [RR=1.19, 95%CI(1.13, 1.26), P < 0.000 01], operation time [MD=10.54, 95% CI(6.09, 15.00), P < 0.000 01], intraoperative blood loss [MD=-14.83, 95%CI(-20.54,-9.13), P < 0.000 01], hospitalization time [MD=-1.44, 95%CI(-2.65,-0.23), P=0.02], incision length [MD=-2.87, 95%CI (-3.60, -2.14), P < 0.000 01], hospitalization cost [MD=-2 442.10, 95% CI(-4 466.34, -417.86), P=0.02], shoulder pain after operation [RR=0.34, 95%CI(0.22, 0.53), P < 0.000 01], visual analogue scale score [MD=-0.85, 95% CI(-1.28, -0.41), P=0.000 2], final Constant-Murley score at 6 months postoperatively [MD=8.82, 95%CI(1.91, 15.72), P=0.01; MD=6.66, 95%CI(4.46, 8.86), P < 0.000 01]CONCLUSION: The treatment of Rockwood III type and above acromioclavicular joint dislocation with double Endobutton plate is superior to that clavicular hook plate. It has the advantages of short operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, less trauma, short hospitalization time and less cost, and good functional recovery of shoulder joint after operation.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To investigate the short-term effectiveness of arthroscopic assisted double Endobutton "8" buckle fixation in the treatment of Rockwood Ⅲ type acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Methods: The clinical data of 12 patients with Rockwood Ⅲ type acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation who were treated with arthroscopic assisted double Endobutton "8" buckle fixation between June 2016 and June 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 8 males and 4 females, with an average age of 47.0 years (range, 36-58 years). There were 4 cases of left shoulder and 8 cases of right shoulder. The causes of injury included traffic accident injury in 7 cases and falling injury in 5 cases. The average time from injury to operation was 5.0 days (range, 3-14 days). Before operation and at last follow-up, the shoulder joint activity was recorded; the improvements of function and pain were evaluated by Constant score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score, respectively; the reduction was evaluated by measuring the coracoid spacing of the affected side on the anteroposterior X-ray film of shoulder joint. Results: All 12 cases were followed up 6-36 months, with an average of 20.6 months. All the incisions healed by first intention. There was no complications such as clavicle and coracoid fractures and Endobuton displacement. At last follow-up, the range of motion of the abduction improved from preoperative (77.5±4.5)° to (162.5±6.5)°, the range of motion of forward flexion improved from (84.1±5.2)° to (169.5±5.8)°, the Constant score improved from 42.5±2.3 to 92.4±2.3, the VAS score improved from 5.4±0.8 to 0.6±0.5, and the coracoid spacing reduced from (20.5±1.4) mm to (9.2±0.6) mm, all showing significant differences ( P<0.05). Conclusion: Arthroscopic assisted double Endobutton "8" buckle fixation for the treatment of Rockwood Ⅲ type acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation is safe, less invasive, and quicker recovery. It can effectively alleviate shoulder pain, significantly improve the mobility of the shoulder joint, and achieve good short-term effectiveness.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To observe the short-term effectiveness of Endobutton plate in the reconstruction of Lisfranc ligament in tarsometatarsal joint injury. Methods: Between March 2015 and July 2018, 18 patients with tarsometatarsal joint injuries were treated with Lisfranc ligament reconstruction by Endobutton plate. There were 12 males and 6 females with an average age of 32.5 years (range, 16-55 years). The causes of injury were traffic accident in 8 cases, falling from height in 3 cases, crushing by a heavy objective in 4 cases, and spraining in 3 cases. There were 10 cases of Myerson type A, 4 of type B1, 2 of type B2, 1 of type C1, and 1 of type C2. The interval between injury and operation ranged from 3 to 9 days (mean, 4.9 days). X-ray examination was performed regularly after operation to measure the distance between the first and the second metatarsal joints, and the visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate the pain relief. At last follow-up, the reduction of tarsometatarsal joint was evaluated by measuring and comparing the height of the affected and healthy arches. The foot function was evaluated according to the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. Results: The average follow-up time was 15.8 months (range, 10-28 months). All incisions healed by first intention. X-ray reexamination showed that there was no screw loosening or plate fracture. There were significant differences in the distance between the first and the second metatarsal joints and VAS score at 3 months after operation, before removal of the internal fixator, and at last follow-up when compared with preoperative values ( P0.05). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the arch height between affected foot [(5.3±0.2) mm] and healthy foot [(5.4± 0.3) mm] ( t=1.798, P=0.810). The AOFAS score of foot function was 89.5±7.3 with excellent in 12 cases, good in 4 cases, and fair in 2 cases. The excellent and good rate was 88.9%. Conclusion: The reconstruction of Lisfranc ligament with Endobutton plate can stabilize the tarsometatarsal joint and achieve satisfactory foot function at early stage.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES@#To explore the safety and effectiveness of arthroscopic reconstruction of coracoclavicular ligament by suspensory fixation to manage the acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.@*METHODS@#From January 2016 to December 2017, 18 cases of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation were carried out with arthroscopic reconstruction of coracoclavicular ligament by double Endobutton plate suspensory fixation. Anteroposterior view X-ray plain radiographs were obtained on the second day, 6 months and 12 months after the surgery, MRI was performed in 1 year after operation. Meanwhile, subjective and objective scoring were obtained by Vsual Analogue Scale (VAS), Rating Scale of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale (UCLA).@*RESULTS@#All patients were followed up for 12 to 30 months (an average of 18 months). There was no patient with infection, neurovascular injury, loosening and breakage of internal fixation, re-dislocation of acromioclavicular joint, clavicular fracture, coracoid process fracture, etc. Postoperative X-ray showed that all acromioclavicular joints were completely relocated. The follow-up of MRI after 1 year showed no obvious dislocation of acromioclavicular joint and good recovery of acromioclavicular space. Postoperative shoulder joint function, VAS, ASES, UCLA and acromioclavicular distance were significantly improved compared with those before surgery, with statistically significant differences (all <0.05).@*CONCLUSIONS@#Arthroscopic reconstruction of coracoclavicular ligament by suspensory fixation to manage the acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation has the advantages of minimal invasive, rapid functional recovery and less complications and satisfactory early clinical results.
Subject(s)
Humans , Acromioclavicular Joint , Diagnostic Imaging , General Surgery , Follow-Up Studies , Joint Dislocations , Diagnostic Imaging , General Surgery , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Shoulder Dislocation , Diagnostic Imaging , General Surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Objective To compare Endobutton plating and clavicular hook plating for acromioclavicular joint dislocation.Methods The clinical data of 46 patients with acromioclavicular joint dislocation were retrospectively analyzed who had been treated at Department of Orthopaedics,The Seventh Affiliated Hospital to Sun Yat-Sen University from October 2015 to December 2017.They were 35 men and 11 women,aged from 18 to 60 years (mean,36.3 years).All dislocations were unilateral,involving the left side in 20 cases and the right side in 26.By the Rockwood classification of dislocations,there were 18 cases of type Ⅲ,24 cases of type Ⅳ and 4 cases of type Ⅴ.Of them,22 were treated with clavicular hook plating and 24 with Endobutton plating.The 2 groups were compared in terms of operation time,incision length,intraoperative blood loss,operation cost,visual analogue scale (VAS) and Constant-Murley scores.Results The 2 groups were comparable because there were no significant differences between them in the general clinical data before operation (P ＞ 0.05).The Endobutton plating group was significantly better than the hook plating group in the incision length (5.3 ± 0.6 cm versus 8.0±1.7 cm) and intraoperative blood loss (101.0±12.3 mL versus 135.0±8.1 mL),but significantly poorer than the latter in the operation cost (RMB 21,343 ±965.2 yuan versus RMB 16,849 ±919.7 yuan) (all P ＜ 0.05).The Endobutton plating group was also significantly superior to the hook plating group in the VAS scores (2.3 ±0.8 versus 3.6 ±0.9) and Constant-Murley scores (96.2 ±4.4 versus 89.3 ±5.2) at 6 months after operation (both P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion In the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation,Endobutton plating may lead to better functional recovery of the shoulder,better pain relief and freedom from secondary surgical removal of the implant.
ABSTRACT
Objective To systematically evaluate the clinical effects of endobutton plate and clavicular hook plate in the treatment of ac-romioclavicular joint dislocation. Methods The clinical study on endobutton plate and clavicular hook plate in the treatment of acromiocla-vicular joint dislocation was subjected to computer search for CNKI,VIP,WangFang Data,PubMed,EMbase and The Cochrane Library input before July 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature,extracted data and assessed the risk bias of included studies and then Rev-Man 5. 3 software was used to perform meta-analysis. A total of 10 studies were conducted with 725 patients. Results After operation of the patients who underwent endobutton plate,the Constant score was higher [MD=8. 55,95％CI (7. 82, 9. 29),P<0. 01] with shorter opera-tion time [MD=4. 94, 95％CI 4. 30 to 5. 59,P< 0. 01],less bleeding (MD= -1. 93,95％CI -2. 63 to -1. 22,P<0. 01],and shorter hospital stay [MD= -0. 39, 95％CI -0. 70 to -0. 09,P=0. 01],respectively. Conclusion The treatment of acromioclavicular joint dis-location with type III by endobutton plate has the advantages of shorter operation time,less intraoperative bleeding,quick recovery of shoulder function,and shorter hospital stay.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the clinical effect of Endobutton plates combined with an anchor and clavicle hook plate in the treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From January 2012 to August 2014, 83 patients with Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocation underwent surgical treatments. Among them, 34 patients were treated with Endobutton plate and anchor repair(Endobutton group), including 23 males and 11 females, and the mean age was(39.0±6.3) years old (26 to 51 years old); the average time from injury to operation was(4.1±1.3) days(3 to 7 days);the injured side:14 left, 20 right; the dislocation in 28 patients dues to fall, 6 patients dues traffic accident. There were 49 patients treated with clavicular hook plate(hook plate group), including 33 males and 16 females;the mean age was(37.9±6.3) years old (27 to 53 years old); the average time from injury to operation was(4.1±1.1) days (2 to 7 days);the injured side: 18 left, 31 right;the dislication in 36 patients dues to fall, 13 patients dues traffic accidents. The indexes such as intraoperative bleeding volume, operation time, incision size, postoperative complication and postoperative coracoclavicular space, shoulder joint function, and life quality were compared between two groups.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>In the hook plate group with 49 patients, the plates in 43 patients were removed at the secondary operation, and 32 patients had shoulder pain or limited active range. Thirty four patients in the Endobutton group had no pain symptoms and limited active range. All the patients did not suffer acromioclavicular dislocation again. There was no significant difference between the two groups in operation time, and intraoperative bleeding volume(>0.05). The incision length in the hook plate group was longer than that in Endobutton group(<0.05). The coracoclavicular space of the uninjured and injured side in two groups respectively had no significant differences, and the coracoclavicular space in the injured side between two group had no significant difference(>0.05). There were no significant differences of Constant score and SF-36 between two groups 2 months after operation(>0.05). Sixteen months after operation, the Constant score in the injured side of both groups was higher than that in 2 months postoperative. But the Constant score in the injured side of hook plate group was higher than that in Endobutton group(<0.05). The Constant score in the uninjured side had no significant differences between two group(>0.05). In hook plate group, the Constant score in the uninjured side was higher than that in the injured side. In Endobutton group, there were no significant differences of Constant score between two sides. The 16 month postoperative SF-36 in the injured side of both groups was higher than the 2 month postoperative one, but 16 month postoperative SF-36 in hook plate group was lower than that in Endobutton group (<0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Endobutton plate combined with an anchor can effectively fix Rockwood type III or more acute acromioclavicular dislocation. The method has less complications, avoiding secondary removal of internal fixation.</p>
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To explore the clinical effects of the triple no loop Endobutton plate combined with Orthcord line in treating acromioclavicular dislocation of Tossy type III.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Between February 2011 and September 2013, 36 patients with acromioclavicular dislocation of Tossy type III were treated with triple no loop Endobutton plate and Orthcord line. There were 21 males and 15 females, aged from 9 to 48 years old with an average of (26.41±14.05) years. Couse of disease was from 2 to 7 days in the patients. The patients had the clinical manifestations such as shoulder pain, extension limited, acromioclavicular tenderness, positive organ point sign. Clinical effects were assessed by acromioclavicular scoring system.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Thirty six patients were followed up from 8 to 15 months with an average of (12.2±4.3) months. All incisions got primary healing. At the final follow up, all shoulder pain vanished, acromioclavicular joints without tenderness, negative organ point sign. No redislocation and steel plate loosening were found. According to the acromioclavicular scoring system, 31 cases obtained excellent results, 5 good.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>The method of triple no loop Endobutton plate combined with Orthcord line for acromioclavicular dislocation of Tossy type III has advantage of less risk and complication, good functional rehabilitation and is an ideal method.</p>
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the clinical effect of three Endobutton plates and clavicular hook plate in treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation.Methods Forty-two patients with acromioclavicular joint dislocation were randomly divided into EB group (20 patients) who were treated with three Endobutton plates and CH group (22 patients) who were treated with clavicular hook plate from January 2008 to January 2011.Perioperative index (operation time,blood loss and VAS scores on the third day postoperatively),Karlsson shoulder joint function scores and postoperative complication were compared.Results The operation time and blood loss in EB group were significantly higher than those in CH group [(113.6 ± 25.3)minvs.(62.3±17.8)min,(152.7±15.2) mlvs.(93.1±18.9)ml,P＜0.O5].However,therehadno significant difference for VAS scores on the third day postoperatively between two groups (P ＞ 0.05).EB group was superior to CH group for shoulder joint function scores on the twelfth month postoperatively,but there had no significant difference [95.0％ (19/20) vs.81.8％ (18/22),P ＞ 0.05].The incidence rate of shoulder joint pain and stiffness in EB group were significant lower than those in CH group[20.0 ％ (4/20) vs.50.0％(11/22),20.0％(4/20) vs.54.5％(12/22),P ＜ 0.05].The incidence rate of incision infection in two groups had no significant difference (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions Compared with clavicular hook plate,three Endobutton plates fixation is complex and consequently with more blood loss.However,three Endobutton plates fixation have advantage in clinical effect and complication.