ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the cleaning effect of before and after improvement of P′750 type endoscopic infusion pump sensing infusion. Methods 240 cases of urinary calculi patients were divided into experimental group (120 cases) and control group (120 cases) according to the random number table method. Experimental group made improvements on P′750 type endoscopic infusion pump sensing infusion, Took latex transmission pipe, sampling module, metal fittings and parenteral nutrition infusion bags, disposable connecting pipe connection, and surgery using improved sensing infusion. The control group used unimproved sensing infusion. Results Visual inspection of cleaning pass rate before and after improvement sensing infusion were 85.83% (103/120), 99.17% (119/120), 5 times with light magnifier inspection were 78.33%(94/120), 97.50% (117/120), tampons method inspection were 75.83% (91/120), 95.83% (115/120), ATP bioluminescence monitoring were 70.83% (85/120), 91.67% (110/120), dry pass rate were 90.83%(109/120), 100.00% (120/120), cleaning and drying pass rate were significantly improved (χ2=18.296, 29.159, 32.986, 40.976, 11.528, all P<0.01). Cleaning time before and after improvement sensing infusion were (1 020.40±8.22) s, (539.30±8.70) s. Dry time were (1 199.35±26.70) s, (61.50±5.79) s. Cleaning and drying time were significantly shortened (t=440.340, 456.206, all P<0.01). Conclusion Improvement sensing infusion increased the quality of cleaning and drying, shortened the cleaning and drying time, ensured the quality of surgery using equipment, improved work efficiency, and provided a guarantee for the safe and smooth implementation of the surgery.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Single full-dose oral sodium phosphate (NaP) on the examination day instead of a conventional divided-dose has been used in some patients to reduce burdens and sleep disturbance caused by bowel movement. However, this treatment may be inconvenient to some patients who are adversely affected by the full dose or its-related symptoms. This study compared the quality of bowel preparation, side effects, and patient's acceptance after a full-dose of NaP into the duodenum under an endoscopic examination and with those from conventional polyethylene glycol (PEG). METHODS: A total of 60 admitted patients receiving both endoscopy and colonoscopy each day were divided randomly into two groups and given either PEG 4 L (n=33) or an endoscopic infusion of NaP 90 mL (n=27). Before and after the bowel preparation and 1 day later, the blood pressure, body weight, and serum biochemical parameters were measured. In addition, a detailed questionnaire was used to assess the patient's side effects. The quality of bowel cleansing was assessed by a single endoscopist who was blinded to the type of preparation used. RESULTS: Although changes in the serum biochemical parameters (phosphate: increase, potassium: decrease) were observed in the NaP group, all were normalized after 1 day without side effects. There were significant difference in symptoms after the preparation, such as vomiting, but this was not serious. The suction volume was significantly lower in the NaP group. CONCLUSIONS: A duodenal infusion of NaP might be used as a new bowel cleansing method in patients having trouble with other procedures.