Risk factors of duodenal papilla hemorrhage after endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation for choledocholithiasis (with video) / 中华消化内镜杂志

Objective:To investigate the risk factors of duodenal papilla hemorrhage after endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation (EPBD) for choledocholithiasis.Methods:Clinical data of 411 cases of choledocholithiasis treated by EPBD in Hangzhou First People′s Hospital from January 2016 to December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Based on the development of hemorrhage after EPBD, patients were divided into the hemorrhage group and the non-hemorrhage group. The risk factors of hemorrhage after EPBD were analyzed by single and Logistic regression.Results:Among 411 patients who received EPBD, 29 patients had EPBD-related duodenal papilla hemorrhage and the overall incidence was 7.1%.Univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences between the hemorrhage group and the non-hemorrhage group in diameter≥1.2 cm of balloon dilation ( P=0.001), endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) ( P=0.002)and the incision length of EST ( P<0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that the incision length of EST ( OR=69.771, 95% CI: 7.544-645.296, P<0.001) was the independent risk factor for duodenal papilla hemorrhage after EPBD. Diameter≥1.2 cm of balloon dilation( OR=0.192, 95% CI: 0.071-0.524, P=0.001) was a protective factor. Conclusion:The incision length of EST is an independent risk factor of duodenal papilla hemorrhage after EPBD. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation is a protective factor for postoperative hemorrhage, which can reduce the incidence of bleeding.

Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for common bile duct stones / 中华肝胆外科杂志

Objective To study the clinical efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) in the treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones.Methods This retrospective study of EPLBD for CBD stoneswas conducted between May 2015 and March 2017 on 116 patients.The patients were divided into two groups based on the different methods of treatment:group A (the EPLBD group) and B(the EST + EPBD group).Results Treatment with EPLBD when compared with EST + EPBD produced similar outcomes with regard to the overall stone removal rates (96.2％ vs.93.5％,P ＞ 0.05) and complete ductal clearance in one session (92.6％ vs.92％,P ＞0.05).There were no significant differences in the rates of overall complication (22.2％ vs.22.2％,P ＞ 0.05),hemorrhage (7.4％ vs.11.3％,P ＞ 0.05),post-ERCP pancreatitis (9.3％ vs.6.6％,P ＞ 0.05) and acute cholangitis (5.6％ vs.8.1％,P ＞0.05).When compared with EST + EPBD,mechanical lithotripsy was performed less in the EPLBD group (16.6％ vs.27.4t％,p ＜ 0.05).Conclusions EPLBD was an effective and safe method to treat CBD stones.EPLBD reduced the use of mechanical lithotripsy when compared with EST + EPBD.

Efficacy and complications in endoscopic sphincterotomy and limited endoscopic sphincterotomy plus endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for choledocholithiasis / 中华消化内镜杂志

Objective To compare efficacy and complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy(EST) and limited endoscopic sphincterotomy plus endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (ESBD) for choledocholithiasis.Methods A total of 120 choledocholithiasis patients (stone diameter ≤ 2 cm)underwent endoscopic treatment,including 60 cases of EST,60 ESBD.The stone-free rate,complication rate of postERCP pancreatitis,hemorrhage,perforation and recurrence rate of stones were compared between two groups.Results Success rates of one-time removal were 90.0％ (54 cases) and 93.3％ (56 cases) in group EST and ESBD (x2 =0.436,P =0.743).Eleven case (18.3％) and 4 case (6.7％) underwent mechanical lithotripsy(x2=3.733,P =0.053).There were 4 cases of hemorrhage,6 post-ERCP pancreatitis and 1 perforation in EST group,while in ESBD group,there was 1 case of hemorrhage,4 pancreatitis and no perforation.The total rates of early complications were 18.3％ (11/60) and 8.3％ (5/60) in two groups (x2 =3.322,P =1.422) and recurrence rate of stones were 21.7％ (13/60) and 6.7％ (4/60) respectively (x2=5.551,P =0.034).Conclusion There are no significant differences between EST group and ESBD group in treatment of choledocholithiasis,in success rate of one-time removal and the occurrence of early complications,but the recurrence rate of late complications in ESBD group is lower than that in EST group.ESBD shows high efficacy and safety for younger patient of choledocholithiasis.

Successful Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilatation for a Patient with Recurrent Sump Syndrome / 대한소화기내시경학회지

Sump syndrome is a rare late complication of choledochoenteric anastomosis, and this caused by the accumulation of food debris, choledocholithiasis, bile sludge and cholesterol crystals in the distal common bile duct. This syndrome is characterized by symptoms such as abdominal pain and fever. The treatment modality for this syndrome has been surgery in the past. However, endoscopic treatment such as endoscopic sphinterotomy is currently regarded as the primary therapeutic approach for this condition. We experienced a patient with a history of choledochoduodenostomy and who developed sump syndrome as a complication of the surgery. Endoscopic sphinterotomy was performed for treatment, but this only produced the recurrence of the disease. The recurrent sump syndrome was eventually successfully controlled by performing endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation.

Usefulness of Medium Incision Endoscopic Sphincterotomy with Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilatation for the Removal of Common Bile Duct Stones / 대한소화기내시경학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent meta-analysis data has shown that there was no significant difference in the rate of overall successful stone removal between endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation (EPBD). However, bleeding occurred more frequently in the EST group, and post-ERCP pancreatitis more commonly occurred in the EPBD group. Thus, we hypothesized that medium incision EST modestly combined with EPBD (m-EST+EPBD) could overcome the drawbacks of both techniques. METHODS: Fifty eight patients who underwent m-EST+EPBD for removal of common bile duct stones were compared with sixty patients who underwent EST only. Medium incision EST was performed with a pure cut mode and then a 12 mm diameter balloon was used for the EPBD. RESULTS: Complete bile duct stone clearance was achieved in 96.7% of the patients in the EST group and in 96.5% of the patients who underwent m-EST+EPBD (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups for procedure-related pancreatitis. The rate for procedure- related hemorrhage was 0% in the both groups. CONCLUSIONS: m-EST+EPBD showed the possibility of being alternative to EST for the removal of common bile duct stone. To establish effectiveness and safety of m-EST+EPBD, further randomized large scaled clinical studies for comparing EST and m-EST+EPBD are needed.

Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Plus Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilatation for Large Bile Duct Stones / 대한소화기내시경학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The extraction of large common bile duct (CBD) stones after an endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is successful in 80~90% of cases but it often requires a prolonged time and repeated trials. This study investigated the utility of a combined endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation (EPLBD) and a mid-incision of an EST (m-EST) method for the removal of large CBD stones. METHODS: Thirty patients with large CBD stones were enrolled in this study. EPLBD was carried out using the one-step inflation of a 15~18 mm diameter balloon after m-EST. RESULTS: The maximum stone diameter was 21.62+/-5.38 mm. Twelve patients had more than 4 stones, 7 patients had 2 stones, and the remainder had a single large stone. Complete ductal clearance was achieved in all patients. After the procedure, the serum amylase and/or lipase levels were elevated in 3 patients (13.3%). However, there was no episode of true pancreatitis. Minor bleeding was encountered in only one patient (3.3%), and was easily controlled by an endoscopic epinephrine injection. The procedure was carried out safely in 6 patients with periampullary diverticulum. No perforation or mortality was encountered. CONCLUSIONS: Combined EPLBD and m-EST is a safe and effective method, and may be a good alternative treatment for removing large CBD stones.

The Role of Intraductal Ultrasonography on the Detection of Small Remnant Stones and Their Differentiation from Air-Bubbles, after Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilatation / 대한소화기내시경학회지

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A cholangiogram, immediately taken after bile duct stone removal, does not always provide adequate information about the presence of fragmented small stones in the bile duct, due to a large amount of bowel gas around the commom bile duct (CBD) or air-bubbles in the bile duct. We performed this study to evaluate the clinical usefulness of intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS) on the detection of small remnant stones after endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation (EPBD). METHODS: Among the 42 patients treated with EPBD for the removal of CBD stones, 19 patients who had undergone ESWL or mechanical lithotripsy with basket, were evaluated by IDUS for the detection of remnant bile duct stones. RESULTS: 17 out of 19 (89.5%) patients were successfully performed IDUS. Among the 17 patients, 13 showed no definite stones on cholangiogram, but CBD stones were detected using IDUS in 4 patients (30.7%). Among the 4 whose cases were difficult to differentiate air-bubbles from stones on a cholangiogram, 3 patients were diagnosed as having air-bubbles and 1 patient was diagnosed as having stones, through IDUS. During the process of conducting IDUS 19 times, one ultrasonic miniature probe was damaged. CONCLUSIONS: IDUS is very effective in detecting remnant small bile duct stones that are occasionally undetected on cholangiogram, and in differentiating stones from air-bubbles just after the removal of stones using EPBD. More efforts, however, are needed to improve the durability of the ultrasonic miniature probe.