Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology ; (6): 525-531, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-932700

ABSTRACT

Objective:To investigate the long-term prognosis and failure mode of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who achieved clinical complete remission (cCR) after receiving radical radio (chemo) therapy.Methods:Clinical data of 183 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma eligible for inclusion criteria who received treatment in our hospital from January 2009 to December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The factors that affected the long-term prognosis of patients were identified, and the failure mode of cCR patients and the prognosis after failure were analyzed. SPSS 19.0 statistical software was used for data analysis.Results:As of the follow-up date, the 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates and disease-free survival (DFS) rates of the entire group were 83.1%, 53.4%, 36.2%, 12.8% and 68.9%, 45.9%, 30.5%, 12.0%, respectively. The median OS and DFS were 41.3 months and 33.4 months. The results of multivariate analysis showed that cT staging, cN staging and prescribed dose were the independent factors affecting the OS ( P=0.001, <0.001, 0.003); hoarseness, lesion length, cT staging, cN staging and prescribed dose were the independent factors that affected the DFS ( P=0.002, 0.033, 0.009, <0.001, 0.003). In the whole group, 72 cases (39.3%) had local regional recurrence, 58 cases (31.7%) had distant metastasis, and 26 cases (14.2%) had local regional recurrence with distant metastasis. Among 104 patients after treatment failure, the prognosis of patients receiving salvage treatment was significantly better than that of their counterparts receiving maintenance treatment ( χ2=39.153, P<0.001). Conclusions:The long-term prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who achieved cCR after receiving radical radio (chemo) therapy is still unsatisfactory. Clinically, it is necessary to strengthen the clinical observation and follow-up of these patients. The main treatment failure mode of cCR patients is local regional recurrence. Active salvage treatment can significantly improve clinical prognosis of these patients.

2.
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology ; (6): 140-144, 2018.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-708155

ABSTRACT

Objective To summarize the outcomes and prognostic factors in esophageal cancer (EC) patients.Methods A total of 307 EC patients of stages Ⅱ-Ⅲ were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in our hospital from September 2006 to July 2014.There were 73 patients with stage Ⅱ and 234 with stage Ⅲ.The radiotherapy dose was 50-70 Gy (median 60 Gy).Concurrent chemoradiotherapy were used with fluorouracil plus platinum (PF,166),paclitaxel plus platinum (TP,82) or platinum only (P,59).The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates,the log-rank test was used for survival difference analysis and univariate prognostic analysis.The Cox regression model was used for multivariate prognostic analysis.Results The 1-,3-5-year OS and PFS rates were85.6%,53.8%,36.9% and 74.6%,43.7%,33.1%,respectively.The median OS and PFS were 41.6 months and 29.8 months.The univariate analysis indicated that T stage,N stage,clinical stage,lesion location,lesion length and chemotherapy regimen were prognostic factors for OS and PFS (P=0.007 and 0.013,0.000 and 0.000,0.000 and 0.000,0.002 and 0.000,0.141 and 0.005,0.018 and 0.165).Multivariate analysis showed that T stage,N stage,lesion location and chemotherapy regimen were prognostic factors for OS (P =0.024,0.000,0.007 and 0.028),lesion location,lesion length and N stage were prognostic factors for PFS (P=0.004,0.033 and 0.035).The median OS and PFS for EC patients treated by total dose 50-60 Gy,>60-70 Gy were 47.4 months,37.8 months (P=0.469) and34.1 months,25.1 months (P=0.0.233),therewere no statistic difference.Conclusions The outcome of EC patients treated with concurrent chemoratherapy could obtain a long-term survival,combination chemotherapy is superior to single drug,there are no statistical difference between high-dose and low-dose,and the acute toxic effects can be tolerated.

3.
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology ; (6): 1006-1011, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-613022

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the local control (LC), long-term overall survival (OS), and clinical adverse reactions in esophageal carcinoma patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy at different radiotherapy doses.Methods A total of 373 esophageal carcinoma patients who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy in our hospital during 2004-2013 were included in this retrospective study.These patients were divided into60 Gy group (n=119) based on the dose of radiation.The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate LC and OS rates;the log-rank test was used for survival comparison and univariate prognostic analysis;the Cox model was used for multivariate prognostic analysis.Results The 3-, 5-, 7-, and 10-year sample sizes were 97,96,56, and 38 in the60 Gy group.The 3-, 5-, 7-, and 10-year LC rates were 55.3%, 51.4%, 48.9%, and 48.9% in the60 Gy group (P=0.020).The 3-, 5-, 7-, and 10-year OS rates were 35.4%, 26.1%, 22.0%, and 22.0% in the60 Gy group (P=0.000).The univariate analysis showed that for stage Ⅱ esophageal carcinoma patients with gross tumor volume (GTV) ≤44 cm3, the LC rate was higher in the 60 Gy group than in the44 cm3, the LC rate was higher in the 60 Gy than in the>60 Gy group (P=0.011,0.015), and the OS rate was higher in the 60 Gy group than in the other two groups (P=0.045,0.006 and P=0.033,0.002).The incidence rates of acute radiation esophagitis and radiation pneumonia were significantly higher in the>60 Gy group than in the other two group (P=0.007,0.033).Furthermore, the multivariate analysis indicated that radiotherapy dose, T stage, and N stage were independent prognostic factors for esophageal carcinoma (P=0.004,0.008,0.037).Conclusions Concurrent chemoradiotherapy at 60 Gy is most efficacious for patients with esophageal carcinoma, and the radiotherapy dose of>60 Gy significantly increases the incidence of adverse reactions.

4.
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology ; (6): 517-521, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-608326

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the efficacy between three-dimensional radiotherapy (3DRT) combined with chemotherapy and radiotherapy alone for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for 1257 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who were admitted to our hospital from July 2003 to June 2012 and met the inclusion criteria;362 patients were treated with 3DRT combined with chemotherapy (chemoradiotherapy group) and 895 patients were treated with radiotherapy alone (radiotherapy group).The short-term outcome, overall survival (OS) rate, and causes of death were analyzed.The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rates, and the log-rank test was used for survival difference analysis and univariate prognostic analysis.Results The response rate was 99.1%(346/349) in the chemoradiotherapy group and 99.0%(813/821) in the radiotherapy group (P=0.397).The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 74.0%,42.0%,and 32.9% in the chemoradiotherapy group and 65.9%,33.0%,and 23.3% in the radiotherapy group (P=0.000), and were 75.6%,43.5%,and 33.2% in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group and 65.9%,33.0%,and 23.3% in the radiotherapy group (P=0.000).There were no significant differences in 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates between the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group and the sequential chemoradiotherapy group (P=0.583).The sequential chemoradiotherapy group had an insignificant increase in 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates compared with the radiotherapy group (P=0.065).Tumor recurrence and local control failure were the main causes of death, followed by distant metastasis.The chemoradiotherapy group had a significantly lower proportion of patients who died of local control failure than the radiotherapy group (7.4% vs.14.7%, P=0.003).Conclusions For patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, chemoradiotherapy leads to significantly improved overall survival compared with radiotherapy alone;compared with radiotherapy alone, sequential chemoradiotherapy results in an increasing trend in OS rates, while concurrent chemoradiotherapy results in significantly increased OS rates.Chemoradiotherapy can reduce the deaths due to local control failure compared with radiotherapy alone.

5.
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology ; (6): 22-28, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-509165

ABSTRACT

Objective To retrospectively analyze the value of postoperative adjuvant therapy in the treatment of stageⅢthoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma ( ESCC) . Methods From 2008 to 2011, a total of 395 patients with stageⅢthoracic ESCC undergoing radical resection were enrolled as subjects. In those patients.97 received surgery alone (S).212 postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (POCT),and 86 postoperative radiotherapy (PORT).Comparison of categorical data was made by chi?square test. The survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan?Meier method. The log?rank test was used for between?group comparison and univariate analysis. Results All patients were followed up for at least 3 years.125 cases were followed up for at least 5 years. The 5?year overall survival ( OS) rates in patients treated with S,POCT and PORT were 17. 1%,29. 2% and 36. 4%,respectively (P=0. 000).POCT and PORT could mainly increased OS in patients of males.upper?and middle?segment,severe ahhesion at surgery.well?or middle?differentiation,stageⅢa andⅢb(P=0. 000?0. 049);whenever ages.tumor lesion,two?/three field esophagectomy.and the number of removal lymph nodes. PORT could improved OS also (P=0. 001?0. 047).POCT could also improve OS in patients of ages≤60, tumor lesion<6 cm and removal lymph nodes<10 ( P=0. 002?0. 049 ) . The 5?year progression?free survival (PFS) were 19. 0% with S,28. 8% with POCT,36. 4% with PORT,respectively (P=0. 012).PORT could improve PFS (P=0. 012);especially for patients of males,ages ≤60,upper?and middle segment ESCC,tumor lesion ≥6 cm,severe ahhesion at surgery,removal lymph node<10 and ≥10,well or middle differentiation,stageⅢa andⅢb(P=0. 001?0. 042).But POCT could not increased PFS (P=0. 119) . Conclusions In the treatment of patients with stage Ⅲ thoracic ESCC undergoing radical resection,both POCT and PORT can improve the OS rate, particularly in patients with stage Ⅲa or Ⅲb middle and upper thoracic ESCC, severe adhesion formation during surgery. and moderately or well differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. The DFS rate is improved in patients treated with PORT,but not in those treated with POCT.

6.
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology ; (6): 35-40, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-509162

ABSTRACT

Objective To analyze the prognosis of advanced esophageal carcinoma treated with paclitaxel and different platinum?based chemotherapy regimens plus intensity?modulated radiotherapy ( IMRT) , and to explore an optimal chemotherapy regimen. Methods A total of 242 patients with advanced esophageal carcinoma who were admitted to our hospital and treated with paclitaxel and cisplatin ( 68 patients), nedaplatin (85 patients), lobaplatin (58 patients), or oxaliplatin (31 patients) plus IMRT from 2008 to 2014 were enrolled as subjects. The prognosis of the four groups was analyzed after 2, 3, and ≥4 cycles of chemotherapy. The survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan?Meier method and analyzed by the log?rank test. The Cox model was used for the multivariate prognostic analysis. Results The sample number of 3 years was 168 cases. In all the 242 patients, the medium survival time was 31. 1 months and the 3?year overall survival ( OS) rate was 47. 4%. There was no significant difference in the 3?year OS rate between the cispaltin, nedaplatin, lobaplatin, and oxaliplatin groups ( 46. 2% vs. 56. 4% vs. 45. 7% vs. 29. 0%, P=0. 090) . The stratified analysis showed that the cisplatin, nedaplatin, and lobaplatin groups had a significantly higher OS rate than the oxaliplatin group ( 50. 1% vs. 29. 0%, P=0. 021 ) . There was no significant difference in the 3?year OS rate between patients receiving 2, 3, and≥4 cycles of chemotherapy ( 40. 1% vs. 49. 5% vs. 50. 8%, P=0. 264) . The multivariate analysis showed that esophageal tumor volume and the maximal size of metastatic lymph node were independent prognostic factors. Conclusions Combined with IMRT, paclitaxel plus cisplatin, nedaplatin, or lobaplatin?based chemotherapy achieves improved survival rates than paclitaxel plus oxaliplatin?based chemotherapy. Esophageal tumor volume and the maximal size of metastatic lymph node are independent prognostic factors.

7.
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology ; (6): 737-743, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-620254

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluation and comparison the curative effect of different adjuvant therapy and prognostic factors with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after surgery,and to find the best treatment for them.Methods A total of 863 patients with thoracic ESCC underwent surgery in the fourth hospital of Hebei Medical University,From January 2007 to December 2010,To analyze the influence factors of the patient′s independent prognosis and the effect of postoperative adjuvant therapy on the prognosis of patients.The 1:1, after the tendency of a total of 261 cases were used PSM method (87 cases/group).The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate OS,DFS and log-rank test and monovariable analysis,Cox model was used to multivariable analysis.Results The sample size in 1,3,5 was 123,589,863 cases.The 1-,3-,and 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of all patients were 89.7%,62.1%,51.7% and 76.8%,52.1%,44.2%,respectively.The 1,3,5-years of OS and DFS were 956%,73.3%,61.1% and 85.6%,61.1%,54.4%,78.9%,38.9%,31.3% and 67.8%,27.8%,20.0%,92.2%,55.6%,44.4% and 67.8%,44.4%,36.7%(all P=0.000) among postoperation chemoradiotherapy (POCRT),postoperation chemotherapy (POCT) and postoperation radiotherapy (PORT) after pairing with PSM.The result of COX analysis showed that the degree of inflammatory adhesion,pTNM stage and the number of positive lymph nodes were the independent prognostic factors in patients with OS (P=0.002,0.000,0.007).The history of drinking,pTNM stage and treatment model were the independent prognostic factors of DFS (P=0.009,0.000,0.012).Conclusions Patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after surgery to receive adjuvant therapy has a good effect,compared with PORT and POCT,POCRT can significantly improve the OS and DFS,and POCRT was the independent prognostic factors of DFS.

8.
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology ; (6): 1177-1181, 2016.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-501878

ABSTRACT

Objective To analyze the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma and its influencing factors,and to provide an optimal combination mode of chemoradiotherapy for treating esophageal carcinoma. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on clinical data from 232 patients with esophageal carcinoma who were admitted to our hospital from January 2006 to December 2012 and received radical chemoradiotherapy. All patients received three?dimensional conformal radiotherapy or intensity?modulated radiotherapy as well as platinum?based chemotherapy. The overall survival ( OS ) and local control ( LC) rates were calculated using the Kaplan?Meier method and analyzed using the Logrank test. Univariate and multivariate prognostic analyses were made by the log?rank test and the Cox proportional hazard model,respectively. Results In all patients,the 1?,3?,and 5?year LC rates were 66?1%,42?2%, and 38?5%,respectively;the median LC time was 24?4 months;the 1?,3?,and 5?year OS rates were 73?3%, 37?2%,and 19?5%,respectively;the median OS time was 21 months. The univariate analysis revealed that T stage,N stage,clinical stage,irradiation range,and no less than 3 cycles of chemotherapy were influencing factors for OS ( P=0?000,0?000,0?000,0?030,0?001) and LC ( P=0?112,0?031,0?009,0?074,0?218) . The multivariate analysis revealed that N stage,clinical stage,and no less than 3 cycles of chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for OS ( P=0?006,0?000,0?001) . Conclusions The LC and long?term OS rates in patients with early?stage esophageal carcinoma can be substantially improved by radical chemoradiotherapy. The irradiation range and no less than 3 cycles of chemotherapy improve the long?term survival in patients.

9.
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology ; (6): 228-233, 2016.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-488233

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the association of local factors with local recurrence (LR) and distant metastasis ( DM) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma ( ESCC) who do not experience clinical metastasis.Methods A total of 236 eligible ESCC patients were analyzed retrospectively, and the association of lesion length on esophagography, maximum tumor diameter, and tumor volume with survival and treatment failure pattern was analyzed.Kaplan-Meier test and Cox regression were used for survival analysis and to identify prognostic factors.Results The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates, LR rates, and DM rates were 88.6%,52.4%,30.2%, 15.5%,35.6%,45.8%, and 9.0%,22.2%, 30.6%, respectively.The multivariate analysis showed that short-term treatment outcome and maximum tumor diameter were independent prognostic factors for overall survival rate ( P=0.000, 0.019); sex, maximum tumor diameter, irradiation method, and short-term treatment outcome were independent prognostic factors for LR (P=0.039,0.003,0.045,0.000);maximum tumor diameter was the independence factor for DM (P=0.035).In the patients receiving elective nodal irradiation and involved-field irradiation, the maximum tumor diameter was the prognostic factor for LR (P=0.008,0.001), and the lesion length on esophagography, maximum tumor diameter, and tumor volume were prognostic factors for DM (P=0.009, 0.023,0.014).Conclusions In ESCC patients without clinical metastasis, local factors are significantly associated with LR and DM, among which maximum tumor diameter is the most important factor.

10.
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology ; (6): 522-525, 2012.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-430120

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and side effects of extensive regional field radiotherapy concurrent with chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.Methods Of the 101 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer patients,44 patients were treated by involved field radiotherapy alone,29 patients treated by involved field radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy,and 28 patients received extensive regional field radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy,the total dose of radiotherapy was 60 Gy.The clinical target volume (CTV) of involved field included the gross tumor volume (GTV) plus a 0.8 cm lateral margin,the tumor plus a nominal 3-5 cm cephalad and caudal margin.Extensive regional field radiotherapy was delivered in two steps:the CTV included the CTV of the involved field plus elective nodal region in the first step;in the second step,the CTV definition was same with the CTV of the involved field.Synchronous chemotherapy regimens included TP and NP.Results 90.1%patients completed planned radiotherapy,all patients in the concurrent chemotherapy groups completed at least one cycle of chemotherapy.The follow-up rate was 99%.Twenty-four and 42 patients completed followed-up more than 24 months in the radiotherapy alone and concurrent chemoradiotherapy group,respectively.The median survival time of the involved field radiotherapy group,involved field chemoradiotherapy group and extensive regional field chemoradiotherapy group was 13,21 and 19 months,respectively;the 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was 15%,48% and 46%,respectively for the three groups.The 2-year OS rate was improved significantly in the chemoradiotherapy group (x2 =6.83,P =0.033).Compared with radiotherapy alone group,the incidence of grade three or four bone marrow suppression was higher in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group (53%: 0 %,x2 =32.94,P =0.000),the remaining adverse events (acute radiation pneumonitis,acute radiation esophagitis,esophageal fibrosis,late radiation lung injury) had no significant intergroup differences (x2 =5.56,6.70,2.39,0.42,P =0.235,0.349,0.881,0.981).Conclusions Compared with radiotherapy alone,concurrent chemoradiotherapy can improve the survival rate for locally advanced esophageal cancer.The side effects of the extensive regional field radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy is well tolerated.But the efficacy of the extensive regional field radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy needs further research.

11.
China Oncology ; (12)1998.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-548596

ABSTRACT

2(38.2 vs 34.4 months, P=0.214).The 1, 2 and 3-year local control rates were 84.0%, 72.9% and 56.7%, respectively.Conclusion:When given a sufficient combination of modality treatment for selected elderly patients with esophageal carcinoma, the tolerance and therapeutic efficacy were not significantly worse than those of younger patients.Therefore, combined chemoradiotherapy for elderly patients is worthy of further study.

12.
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology ; (6)1995.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-558343

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate the treatment results and side-reactions of esophageal carcinoma treated with late course accelerated hyperfration radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy(LCAHR+C). Methods A prospective randomized trial was carried out on 173 esophagus squamous carcinoma patients whom were randomized into two groups:1. LCAHR group—89 patients treated by conventional fractionated radiotherapy during the first two-thirds of the whole course with 40Gy in 20-22 fractions, then followed by LCAHR with 20-30Gy in 14-20 fractions, 1.5Gy per fraction, 2 times per day, to a total dose of 60-70Gy in 34-42 fractions over 37-42 days; 2.LCAHR+C group—94 patients were received the same radiotherapy as LCAHR, supplement with concurrent chemotherapy from the first day of radiotherapy. The chemotherapy regimen was LFP: intravenous infusion of cisplatin 20mg/d, calcium folinate 100mg/d and 5-fluorouracil 500mg/d for five consecutive days, every 28d as one cycle to totally 4 cycles. Results The short-term effective rate was 85% and 95% in LCAHR and LCAHR+C group,respectively(?~2=4.45,P=0.035).The 1-,2-and 3-year local control rate was 73%,55%,49% and 83%,73%,65% in LCAHR and LCAHR+C group, respectively(?~2=5.32,P=0.021).The 1-,2- and 3-year survival rate was 74%,53%,41% and 84%,65%,52% in LCAHR and LCAHR+C group,respectively(?~2= 2.85 , P= 0.091 ).The leucocytopenia and gastrointestinal tract side-reactions in LCAHR+C group were more severe than those of LCAHR group(?~2=7.85,15.06;P=0.005,0.000). Conclusions Late course accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy can be taken as a effective treatment for esophageal carcinoma. It can improve short-term curative effect and local control rate, in spite of increase in leucocytopenia and gastrointestinal tract side-reactions.

13.
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology ; (6)1992.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-679343

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate the role of late course accelerated fractions.ted irradiation(LCAF) combined with concurrent chemotherapy in the management of esophageal carcinoma.Methods From March 1998 to July 2000,111 eligible patients were randomized into LCAF alone group(LCAF,57 patients)or LCAF plus concurrent chemotherapy group(LACF-CT,54 patients).The radiotherapy regimen was identical in the two groups,consisting of conventional fractionation in the first 2/3 course and accelerated fractionation in the second 1/ 3 course to a total dose of 68.4 Gy/41 Fx/44 d.Chemotherapy regimen consisted of four eycles of cisplatin 25 mg/ (m~2?d)plus fluorouracil 600 mg/(m~2?d)on day 1 to 3 every 4 weeks and was delivered on the first day of radiotherapy.Results The median follow-up time was 67.1 months(range 47.6-76.4 months).The 1-,3-,5- year survival rate was 67%,44% ,40% and 77%,39% 28% in LACF-CF and LEAF group,respectively(P =0.310).Grade 3+4 acute side-effact was 42% and 25% in LCAF-CT and LCAF group,respectively(P<0. 05),with 3 treatment-related deaths in the LCAF-CT group.Conclusions Late course accelerated fractionated irradiation combined with concurrent chemotherapy has a trend towards improving the survival,at the cost of increasing acute side-effect.Its role needs further confirmation by larger sample studied in randomization.

14.
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology ; (6)1992.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-679339

ABSTRACT

Objective To define the maximum-tolerated dnse(MTD)and observe the side effect of escalating cisplatin with 5-fluorouracil in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma in Chinese,with toxicity studied.Methods Previously untreated fifteen Chinese patients suffering from esophageal carcinoma received conventional fractionafiun radiotherapy,with 5 daily fractions of 2.0 Gy per week.The total radiation dose was 60 Gy.Concurrent chemotherapy dose escalation was given by the relatively safe and kidney-sparing modified Fibonacci sequence.The starting dose was cisplatin 37.5 mg/m~2 D1 and 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m~2 D1-5, respectively.This regimen was repeated 4 times every 28 days.Escalation dose was eisplatin 7.5mg/m~2 and 5- fluorouracil 100mg/m~2.Every cohort contained at least 3 patients.If no dose-limiting toxicity(DLT)was observed, the next dose level was opened for entry.These courses were repeated until DLT appeared.MTD was declared as one dose level below which DLT appeared.Results DLT was defined as grade 3 radiation-induced esophngitis at the level of cisplatin 60 mg/m~2,5-fluorouracil 700 mg/m~2.MTD was defined as eisplafin 52.5 mg,/m~,5- fluorouracil 700 mg/m~2.The major side effect were radiation-induced esophagitis,leucopenia,nausea,vomiting and anorexia.Conclusion Maximun tolerated dose of cisplatin with 5-fluorouracil in concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the Chinese people with esophageal carcinoma were eisplatin 52.5 mg/m~2 D1,5-fluorouracil 700 mg/m~2 D1-5,repeated 4 times every 28 days.

15.
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology ; (6)1992.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-555845

ABSTRACT

Objective To analyze the result of late course accelerated hyperfractionation (LCAFR) and three dimensional conformal radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy (LCAFR+C)on stage Ⅲ esophageal carcinoma. Methods Ninety-eight patients with stage Ⅲ esophageal carcinoma were divided randomly into two groups:1. LCAFR group: patients were treated with conventional fractionated radiotherapy during the first two-thirds of the treatment to a dose of 40?Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks, then followed by LCAFR with reduced fields using three dimensional conformal radiotherapy to a dose of 15-24?Gy over 7-12 days, 1.5Gy per fraction, to the total dose of 55-64?Gy in 30~36 fractions over 35-40 days. 2. LCAFR+C group:The radiotherapy schedule was the same as the LCAFR group,but with concurrent chemotherapy of DDP 20?mg d1-5, LF 200?mg and 5-Fu 500?mg d 6-10 , 28 days in one cycle to totally 5 cycles. Results The 1-, 2-, and 3-year actuarial survival rates were 73%, 53%, 35% and 76%, 73%, 55% respectively (? 2=4.12,P

16.
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology ; (6)1992.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-552680

ABSTRACT

0.05). Conclusions Inductive chemotherapy with 5 fluorouracil, cisplatin, bleomycinA5 plus radiotherapy may improve the outcome of esophageal cancer, with the toxic and side effects of the combined modality severer than radiation alone, but they are well tolerated.

17.
Journal of Chongqing Medical University ; (12)1987.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-576287

ABSTRACT

Objective:To evaluate the effect of radiotherapy combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy on patients with upper esophageal carcinoma.Methods:Forty-five patients with upper esophageal carcinoma were divided into two groups randomly. There were 23 patients in neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radiotherapy group(CR),and 22 patients in radiotherapy group(R).The regimen of neoadjuvant chemotherapy including cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil was administered.Two to three weeks after two cycles of chemotherapy,the patients were irradiated.Carmofur in CR group was administered in the period of late-course radiotherapy for four weeks,and the methods of radiotherapy were identical in two groups.Results:The 1,2,3-year survival rates were 73.91%,56.52% and 47.83% for CR group and 59.09%,31.82% and 18.18% for R group,and survival rates differed significantly(?2=4.8112、P =0.0283)in two groups;however,more serious side effects were in CR group,but they could be tolerated by patients.Conclusions:Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with PF regimen plus radiotherapy may improve the outcome of upper esophageal carcinoma.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL