ABSTRACT
Objective:To apply the best evidence for the prevention of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary angiography or intervention to clinical practice and evaluate its effect.Methods:This was a quasi-experimental study. Based on the evidence continuous quality improvement model, evidence-based practice method was used to obtain the best evidence, formulated review indicators, analyzed the obstacles in the practice process and took action strategies. The 88 patients who underwent transradial coronary angiography or intervention in the Cardiology Department of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (Qingdao) from June 1 to 30, 2020 were selected as the baseline review group by convenience sampling. The 94 patients who underwent this treatment from September 1 to 30, 2020 were selected as the evidence application group. The baseline review group used the original perioperative management plan, and the evidence application group used the perioperative management plan based on the best evidence. The implementation rate of each review indicator, the incidence of radial artery occlusion, the degree of compression pain, and the comfort level of patients were compared between the two groups.Results:The implementation rates of review indicators 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 in the evidence application group were 100.0% (94/94), 100.0% (94/94), 11.7(11/94), 88.3% (83/94), 100.0% (94/94), 100.0%(94/94), 85.1%(80/94), respectively, which were higher than those in the baseline review group(all 0), except for the review indicator 4, the differences were statistically significant ( χ2 values were 9.00-178.02, all P<0.05). The incidence of radial artery occlusion and the incidence of pain Numerical Rating Scale>3 points in the evidence application group were 2.1% (2/94) and 3.2% (3/94), respectively, which were lower than 14.8% (13/88) and 23.9% (21/88) in the baseline review group; the comfort level of patients in the evidence application group was 96.8% (91/94), which was higher than 63.6% (56/88) in the baseline review group. The differences were statistically significant ( χ2 = 8.01, 15.21, 30.10, all P<0.05). Conclusions:The best evidence for the prevention of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary angiography or intervention can be applied to clinical practice, which can standardize the behavior of medical staff, reduce the incidence of postoperative radial artery occlusion, reduce the degree of compression pain, and improve the comfort of patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To promote the evidence application of the "Expert Consensus on Nursing Care for Prevention of Adult Oral Tracheal Intubation Unplanned Extubation" and verify its effectiveness.Methods:This was a quasi-experimental study. A total of 31 ICU nurses from Tianjin Teda Hospital were trained by workshops, in order to help promote the evidence transformation. With the evidence application model of the JBI Evidence-Based Health Care Center, we reviewed the measures for mechanically ventilated patients before and after intervention (51 cases at baseline and 77 cases at second review).Results:No unplanned extubation occurred during the period of two rounds of evidence review, the implementation rate of 9 review indicators had improved, and 6 of them showed statistically significant differences. indicator 1 increased from 3.92% (2/51) to 100.00% (77/77),indicator 3 increased from 86.27% (44/51) to 100.00% (77/77), indicator 5 increased from 27.45% (14/51) to 100.00% (77/77), indicator 7 increased from 45.10% (23/51) to 70.13% (54/ 77), indicator 8 increased from 50.98% (26/51) to 100.00% (77/77), indicator 9 increased from 45.10% (23/51) to 77.92 % (60/77), the difference was all statistically significant ( χ2 values were 8.02-119.87, all P<0.05). Conclusions:The "Expert Consensus on Nursing Care for Prevention of Adult Oral Tracheal Intubation Unplanned Extubation" can provide guidelines for clinical nursing practice. While preventing unplanned extubation, it can standardize nurses' behavior and promote medical-nursing cooperation.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To understand the preparation of evidence-based nursing practice for postoperative venous thrombosis in the department of spine and orthopedics in our hospital, and to identify the obstacle factors in the process of evidence-based nursing practice so as to promote the successful transformation and application of evidence.@*Methods@#A questionnaire survey was conducted among 164 nurses in Department of Orthopedics of Wuhan Union Hospital in Hubei Province by using self-made general data questionnaire and Clinic Readiness of Evidence-Based Nursing Assessment (CREBNA).@*Results@#The total score of CREBNA was (135.99 ±14.52) points, accounting for 87.10% of the full score. The average score of each subscale item was from high to low: organization environment subscale (4.44±0.67) points, evidence subscale (4.41±0.60) points and promotion factor subscale (4.31±0.69) points. Multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that different levels of understanding of evidence-based nursing practice was the main influencing factor of spine orthopedic nurses′ evidence-based practice readiness (P<0.05).@*Conclusion@#In this study, there were good level of readiness for evidence-based nursing practice and the current environment is conducive to the development of evidence-based practice programs. Before the application of evidence, managers should clarify the obstacles to change and formulate individual intervention measures to promote the clinical application of evidence.