ABSTRACT
Objective Analysis of hybrid cardiac and non-cardiac operations.Methods 11 patients received hybrid operations during 2000 ～2016 in our hospital were summarized, meanwhile another 11 patients undergoing only cardiac sur-gery served as controls.The level of CK-MB, TNI and visual analogue pain scores were recorded.The hospitalization expenses and postoperative hospital time were compared between the two groups .Results There was no death during hospitalization . There were no serious complications such as wound infection, delayed wound healing, postoperative bleeding requiring re-thora-cotomy and hemostasis, malignant arrhythmia, cerebral infarction and so on.Longer operation time[(358 ±79)min vs.(224 ±56)min, P<0.01], more allogeneic red blood cells transfusion[(3.2 ±1.6)U/case vs.(1.1 ±0.8)U/case, P<0.05] and more plasma transfusion[(515 ±234)ml/case vs.(284 ±92)ml/case, P<0.01]in hybrid operation group than those in the control group.There was no significant difference about CK-MB and TNI between two groups perioperatively(P>0.05). The wound pain was mild after cardiac surgery , and the wound pain was moderate after hybrid operation , which had little effect on rehabilitation exercises such as cough.4 days longer of postoperative hospital stay and 23 thousand yuan of hospitalization cost in hybrid operation group than those in the control group.One patient diagnosed of unstable angina pectoris and sigmoid colon cancer with intestinal obstruction was failed to resection of the tumor after received pericardial stripping and coronary ar-tery bypass surgery.The patient died three weeks after surgery due to intestinal obstruction and cachexia .The remaining 10 pa-tients were underwent successful surgery, cured and left hospital.No serious cardiovascular events, tumor recurrence and me-tastasis were found as followed up for 6-20 months.Conclusion Our practices show that hybrid cardiac and non-cardiac op-erations can be done safely and effectively.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: It has been known that pulsatile flow is physiologic and more favorable to tissue perfusion than nonpulsatile flow. The purpose of this study is to directly compare the effect of pulsatile versus nonpulsatile blood flow to renal tissue perfusion in extracorporeal circulation by using a tissue perfusion measurement system. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Total cardiopulmonary bypass circuit was constructed to twelve Yorkshire swines, weighing 20~30 kg. Animals were randomly assigned to group 1 (n=6, nonpulsatile centrifugal pump) or group 2 (n=6, pulsatile T-PLS pump). A probe of the tissue perfusion measurement system (QFlow(TM)-500) was inserted into the renal parenchymal tissue. Extracorporeal circulation was maintained for an hour at a pump flow of 2 L/min after aortic cross-clamping. Tissue perfusion flow of the kidney was measured at baseline (before bypass) and every 10 minutes after bypass. Serologic parameters were collected at baseline and 60 minutes after bypass. RESULT: Baseline parameters were not different between the groups. Renal tissue perfusion flow was substantially higher in the pulsatile group throughout the bypass (ranged 48.5~4 in group 1 vs. 65.8~8.3 mL/min/100 g in group 2, p=0.026~0.45). The difference was significant at 30 minutes bypass (47.5+/-18.3 in group 1 vs. 83.4+/-28.5 mL/min/100 g in group 2, p=0.026). Serologic parameters including plasma free hemoglobin, blood urea nitrogen, and creatinine showed no differences between the groups at 60 minutes after bypass (p=NS). CONCLUSION: Pulsatile flow is more beneficial to tissue perfusion of the kidney in short-term extracorporeal circulation. Further study is suggested to observe the effects to other vital organs or long-term significance.