Physicians' Attitudes to Contemporary Issues on Osteoporosis Management in Korea

BACKGROUND: In management of osteoporosis, several concerns here have been raised. The current issue included the utilization of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and fracture-risk assessment (FRAX), screening of vitamin D deficiency and secondary osteoporosis, and long-term use of bisphosphonate and calcium supplements. There was no study on physicians' attitude on these current issues in Korea. Therefore, we investigated the physicians' attitude on these issues by survey. METHODS: We administered a 30-item questionnaire to all members of Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research by email survey form. One hundred participants answered the questionnaire. The questionnaire included the questions about the physicians' attitude to current issues and the barriers to osteoporosis treatment in Korea. RESULTS: Most physicians used bone densitometry devices (99%) and, central DXA was the most accessible device (95%). Eighty-eight percent were aware of FRAX(R), but among them, only 19.3% used it. The main reason for not using FRAX(R) was the lack of time in their proactive (76%). Screening for vitamin D status and secondary osteoporosis was performed by 59% and 52% of the respondents, respectively. The lack of awareness among patients and high costs of medication were perceived as the most important barriers to osteoporosis management in Korea. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides physicians' perspective to the current issue for diagnostic and treatment of osteoporosis in Korea. To further improve osteoporosis management, educational programs for patients and doctors, and the improvement of reimbursement system should be considered in Korea.

Comparative Study of Osteoporosis Treatment of Elderly Patients with Degenerative Osteoarthritis of the Knee Joints, according to the Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service Criteria versus the FRAX(R) Criteria / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: To compare and evaluate any differences in the osteoporosis treatments of elderly patients with degenerative osteoarthritis of the knee joints, in accordance with the Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (HIRA) criteria versus the World Health Organization (WHO) fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX(R), http://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/) criteria, which is a fracture risk assessment tool developed by the WHO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From June 2010 to March 2011, we investigated and screened the target populations of osteoporosis treatments among 65-year-old or older patients with degenerative osteoarthritis of the knee joints who scheduled to undergo elective total knee arthroplasty. They were classified in the treatment group only if they met either the HIRA criterion, defined as having a T score of or =20% or > or =3%, respectively. RESULTS: Of a total of 929 patients, the number of patients included in the treatment group as screened according to the HIRA or FRAX(R) criteria was 562 (60.5%) and 372 (40.0%), respectively. The number of patients who met both criteria was 339 (36.5%), and including 334 non-treated patients (36.0%), a total of 673 patients (72.4%) showed low diagnostic concordance (k=0.471). Of 319 patients diagnosing osteopenia, 33 (10.3%) patients were included in the treatment group according to the FRAX(R) criteria. CONCLUSION: A combination of the HIRA and FRAX(R) criteria is required to improve the current guidelines for osteoporosis treatment.