Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Journal of Leukemia & Lymphoma ; (12): 753-757, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-800714

ABSTRACT

Objective@#To investigate the current status of family hardiness and its influencing factors in children with leukemia.@*Methods@#The children with leukemia and their caregivers in the Children's Hospital of Shanxi from August to November 2017 were enrolled. A questionnaire survey was conducted using a convenient sampling method, and 100 questionnaires were distributed. The questionnaire included the General Status Questionnaire, the Family Hardiness Index (FHI), the Coping Health Inventory for Parents (CHIP) and the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS).@*Results@#A total of 92 valid questionnaires were collected. Among the scores of family hardiness in children with leukemia [(3.29±0.43) points], the responsibility score [(3.32±0.45) points] was higher than the control score [(3.31±0.46) points] and the challenge score [(3.23±0.53) points], and the challenge score was the lowest. The score of frequency of coping styles used by the caregiver of the child with leukemia was (3.64±0.70) points, the most frequent coping style used by the caregiver was "family unity, optimism, cooperative attitude" [(3.73±0.89) points], and the positive [(3.28±0.84) points] and negative [(2.51±0.80) points] emotions were in a moderate state. The child's sex, age, stage of chemotherapy and medical insurance status, the caregiver of the child, the age of the caregiver, the family's place of residence, and the education level were the related factors affecting the family hardiness score (all P < 0.01). The age of child, CHIP-1, CHIP-2, positive emotion and negative emotion were independent factors affecting the family hardiness (all P < 0.05). The CHIP, CHIP-1, CHIP-2 and positive emotion were positively correlated with the family hardiness (r values were 0.827, 0.883, 0.707 and 0.846, all P < 0.01); the negative emotion was negatively correlated with the family hardiness (r=-0.832, P < 0.01).@*Conclusion@#The family hardiness of children with leukemia is in the middle and upper level, the children's age, caregiver's coping style, positive emotion and negative emotion are factors affecting the family hardiness.

2.
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing ; (36): 1576-1580, 2018.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-807864

ABSTRACT

Objective@#To exmain reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Family Hardiness Index(FHI) among patients with cancer.@*Methods@#A convinent sample of 344 patients with cancer was investigated with a self-designed questionnaire about personal information, the Herth Hope Index (HHI) and the Chinese version of FHI. Item analysis was conducted on each item of the Chinese version of FHI; The construct validity of the scale were evaluated by explorotory factor analysis, the reliability of the scale was also evaluated by calculating the Cronbach α coefficient, the split-half reliability and the retest reliability.@*Results@#The Chinese version of FHI consisted of 20 items. Five factors were extracted by factor analysis which explained 57.900% of the total variance. The score of the Chinese version of FHI was significantly correlated to the total score of HHI (r=0.716, p<0.01) .The Cronbach α coefficient of the Chinese version of FHI was 0.806, and the test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.790 and The split-half reliability was 0.793.@*Conclusion@#The Chinese version of FHI demonstrates good reliability and validity during initial testing among patients with cancer.

3.
Chongqing Medicine ; (36): 2952-2954,2958, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-617397

ABSTRACT

Objective To analyze the status of family hardiness and its influencing factors in children with refractory nephrotic syndrome (RNS).Methods A cross-sectional study was carried out in the family members of 120 children patients with RNS admitted to our hospital from January 2013 to February 2016.The general information questionnaire,family hardiness scale (FHI),general self-efficacy scale (GSES),self-rating anxiety scale (SAS),self-rating depression scale (SDS) and simplified coping style questionnaire (SCSQ) were used for investigation and evaluation.The status of family hardiness of children patients with RNS was summarized and its influencing factors were analyzed.Results (1)Among the scores of family hardiness in patients of children with RNS,the score of responsibility dimension was the highest,followed by the score of control dimension.The self-efficacy scores of the family members were in the middle level,the scores of anxiety and depression were in mild level,and the score of positive coping was relatively higher.(2)The univariate analysis showed that the treatment time,education level of family members,place of residence,family per capita monthly income and medical payment method were the related factors influencing the family hardiness score (P<0.05);the Pearson correlation analysis showed that self-efficacy score and positive coping score were positively correlated with the family hardiness score (r=0.425,P=0.011;r=0.536,P=0.002),while the anxiety and depression scores were negatively correlated with the family hardiness score (r=-0.581,P=0.001;r=-0.671,P=0.000).The multivariate regression analysis showed that the family per capita monthly income,self-efficacy score,anxiety score,depression score and positive coping were the independent factors influencing the family hardiness.Conclusion The family hardiness of patients of children with RNS is in the middle and upper level.The family income,self-efficacy of family members,positive coping style,anxiety and depression emotions are related factors influencing family hardiness.

4.
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing ; (36): 21-23, 2014.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-453796

ABSTRACT

Objective The purpose of this study was to identify the effect factors on family adaptation of hospitalized children.Methods A survey was conducted in 330 hospitalized children's parents using questionnaires such as FSI,FVI,FHI,FWBI.Results Multiple factor analysis showed that the strongest resilience factor was family hardiness,the second one was general family value on family adaptation of hospitalized children.Conclusions Family hardiness and family value have the adjusting role on family adaptation of hospitalized children.Therefore,the significance of this study can be used to develop family nursing intervention program based on family resilience to strengthen family adaptation of hospitalized children.

5.
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing ; : 1298-1306, 2004.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-191743

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships of family strain, perceived social support, family hardiness, and family adaptation and identify the family resiliency factors for the adaptation of families who have a child with congenital heart disease. METHOD: The sample consisted of 90 families who had a child diagnosed with congenital heart disease and completed surgical treatment. Data was collected from parents using a questionnaire. RESULTS: Results from path analyses revealed that family strain had a direct effect on both perceived social support and family hardiness, and an indirect effect on family adaptation. Also, the findings revealed that perceived social support had a direct effect on both family hardiness and family adaptation, and family hardiness had a direct effect on family adaptation. Thus, these results indicated that perceived social support and family hardiness had a mediating effect on family strain. CONCLUSION: Findings provide the evidence for the theoretical and empirical significance of perceived social support and family hardiness as family resiliency factors for family adaptation. Clinical implications of these findings might be discussed in terms of family-centered nursing interventions for the families who have a child with congenital heart disease based on an understanding of family resiliency for adaptation.


Subject(s)
Child , Female , Humans , Male , Adaptation, Psychological , Family/psychology , Heart Defects, Congenital/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Social Support
6.
Korean Journal of Child Health Nursing ; : 179-190, 2001.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-32789

ABSTRACT

The purposes of the study were to develop an instrument for family value and to identify the relationships of family value, family hardiness, and family adaptation by appling the family value scale to family with cancer children. The study was conducted in three phases. 1) A survey was conducted from July 20 to August 20, 1999 and 18 items of general family value scale was modified from the data of 153 fathers and 164 mothers. 2) In-depth interviews were made with 29 parents of cancer children from April 20, 1998 to May 20, 1999 to develop family value scale with cancer children, and 12 statements were developed. 3) The final survey was conducted from July 18, 2000 to August 30, 2000 and the data from 309 parents of children who are diagnosed as cancer, 18 or less years of age, and treated either hospitalized or at the outpatient clinics were analyzed to identify the relationships of the concepts. The data analysis utilized SAS 6.12 and LISREL 8 for descriptive statistics, correlation, and Regression for path analysis. The study findings are as follows. The psychometric testing of general family value scale was Cronbach's alpha = 0.78. The reliability of the family value scale with cancer children showed the reliability as Cronbach's alpha = 0.73. Demographic characteristics showing significant correlations were cancer children's age, period of illness, period after completing treatment, mother's age, mother's education level, monthly income, payment type, confidence with health professional, and severity of children's illness. The correlation coefficients among major variables showed that family stressor was positively related with family strains(r=0.33, p < .001), and negatively related with family hardiness(r=-0.21, p < .001). Family strains was negatively related with family hardiness(r= -0.41, p < .001) and family adaptation(r=-0.46, p < .001). Correlations of family hardiness was positive with family value with cancer children(r=-0.31, p < .001), and negative with general family value(r=-0.16, p < .01). Family hardiness was positively related with family adaptation(r=0.35, p < .001). The causal relationship between study variables showed that family strains predicts general family value( gamma =0.12, t=2.02), family value with cancer children predicts family hardiness( gamma =0.31, t=6.30), family strains predicts family hardiness( gamma =-0.40, t=-7.70), family value with cancer children predicts family adaptation( gamma =-0.23, t=-4.11), and family hardiness predicts family adaptation( gamma =0.43, t=7.78).


Subject(s)
Child , Humans , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Education , Fathers , Health Occupations , Mothers , Parents , Psychometrics , Statistics as Topic , Child Health
7.
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing ; : 1569-1579, 2000.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-210470

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to identify the level of grief experience, family hardiness and family resource for management after bereavement of a family member. The subjects of this study were 100 family members who had lost a family member from cancer within the past two years. The data was analyzed using the SPSS program for descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, Duncan test, and Pearson correlation. The results were as follows. 1. The mean score for the level of grief was 2.84 +/- 0.66. The mean score for the a family hardiness was 3.08 +/- 0.39. The mean score for the level of family resource management was 2.70 +/- 0.35. 2. The level of grief experience differed according to respondent's age was F=2.95, p=.02, and type of bereavement was t=2.01, p=.04. 3. The level of family hardiness was not significantly different according to respondent's and familial characteristics. 4. The level of family resource management differed according to monthly income of the family (F=3.98, p=.01). 5. There were negative correlations between grief experience and family hardiness (r= -.551, p<.001), grief experience and family resource for management (r=-.351, p<.001). Family hardiness was positively related with family resource for management (r=.709, p<.001). In conclusion, family hardiness and family resource management were identified as important variables that contributed to reduce the grief experience. Therefore, it is important to develop nursing intervention that enhances family hardiness and family resource for management for bereaved family.


Subject(s)
Humans , Bereavement , Grief , Nursing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL