ABSTRACT
Objective This paper focuses on the field of clinical medicine,with the aim of verifying the feasibility of interdisciplinary literature evaluation model based on feature matching method,to provide support for further interdisciplinary scientific research evaluation.Methods Feature matching method,Delphi expert enquiry,and normalization method were adopted to establish an evaluation system in clinical medicine,which was further verified by case studies.Results The normalization coefficient reflects the difficulty of publishing articles with high impact factors.Through the process of feature matching and normalization,it was found that compared with the fields of Neurology,Psychiatry and Surgery,researchers in the fields of Oncology and Internal Medicine were more likely to publish articles with high impact factors.Conclusions Through case analysis,this study verifies the feasibility of interdisciplinary scientific paper evaluation system.The interdisciplinary paper evaluation system based on feature matching method and normalized evaluation method comprehensively considers the characteristics of various disciplines of clinical medicine and provides a new idea for the evaluation of clinical scientific research talents.
ABSTRACT
Objective To verify the feasibility of interdisciplinary literature evaluation model based on feature matching method,and provide support for further interdisciplinary scientific research evaluation.Methods Feature matching method,Delphi expert enquiry,and normalization methods were used to analyze the keywords and journals of 24 secondary subjects in public health.Relevant journals analysis was conducted to establish a new evaluation model,which was also verified by case studies.Results The interdisciplinary literature evaluation model was feasible.Conclusions This study provided feasibility evidence for interdisciplinary scientific research evaluation to improve the justice and reliability of interdisciplinary scientific research evaluation results.
ABSTRACT
Objective To provide a new way for public hospitals to evaluate the interdisciplinary scientific innovation capacity.Methods Literature review method was adopted to analyze the current problems of public hospital evaluation model of scientific papers,feature matching method was used to build interdisciplinary science and technology innovation ability evaluation model.Results From the perspective of differences among disciplines,the characteristics of each clinical medicine course was analyzed,and feature matching method is applied to determine the academic journals directory by rele vant experts to verify the rationality of affiliation,and then through the analysis of the academic influence of journal size,a comprehensive consideration of public hospitals interdisciplinary characteristics index evaluation system were built.Conclusions As one of the matured sorting algorithms,feature matching method and its application to the different disciplines of science and technology innovation model construction will obviously provide a good theoretical basis for scientific evaluation.