ABSTRACT
Objective To analysis the clinical efficacy of dorsal digital nerves fasciocutaneous pedicle flap (DDNFPF) with superficial vein anastomosis in the treatment of the type III and type IV of fingertip defect, and the re鄄lationship between the incidence of vein crisis and superficial vein anastomosis. Methods A total of 85 patients with 92 fingers, treated by DDNFPF from February, 2017 to December, 2018, were retrospectively analyzed.The superficial veins of 30 patients with 32 fingers were anastomosed, and 55 patients with 60 fingers were not. The difference of the superior rate and the incidence of venous crisis between superficial vein anastomosis and non-superficial vein anasto鄄mosis was compared by Chi-square test. The difference was considered as statistically significant when P＜0.05. The regular postoperative followed-up was performed. Results The average followed-up time was (7.0±2.9) months. The incidence of venous crisis in anastomosis group (1/32) was lower than that in non-anastomosis group (13/60). The dif鄄ference was statistically significant ( χ2=4.217, P＜0.05). There was no significant difference in the superior rate be鄄tween the 2 groups after operation(96.8% and 90.0% respectively, χ2=0.596, P＞0.05). The repaired fingertips of the 2 groups were in good appearance, wear-resistant, stable holders and two-point discrimination was 5 to 8 mm. Con鄄clusion DDNFPF for the type III and IV type of fingertip defect is safe and effective. A anastomosis of superficial veins in recipient area can significantly reduce the incidence of venous crisis.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To analysis the clinical efficacy of dorsal digital nerves fasciocutaneous pedicle flap (DDNFPF) with superficial vein anastomosis in the treatment of the type III and type IV of fingertip defect, and the relationship between the incidence of vein crisis and superficial vein anastomosis.@*Methods@#A total of 85 patients with 92 fingers, treated by DDNFPF from February, 2017 to December, 2018, were retrospectively analyzed. The superficial veins of 30 patients with 32 fingers were anastomosed, and 55 patients with 60 fingers were not. The difference of the superior rate and the incidence of venous crisis between superficial vein anastomosis and non-superficial vein anastomosis was compared by Chi-square test. The difference was considered as statistically significant when P<0.05. The regular postoperative followed-up was performed.@*Results@#The average followed-up time was (7.0±2.9) months. The incidence of venous crisis in anastomosis group (1/32) was lower than that in non-anastomosis group (13/60). The difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.217, P<0.05) . There was no significant difference in the superior rate between the 2 groups after operation (96.8% and 90.0% respectively, χ2=0.596, P>0.05) . The repaired fingertips of the 2 groups were in good appearance, wear-resistant, stable holders and two-point discrimination was 5 to 8 mm.@*Conclusion@#DDNFPF for the type III and IV type of fingertip defect is safe and effective. A anastomosis of superficial veins in recipient area can significantly reduce the incidence of venous crisis.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of anterograde and reverse digital artery island flap in treatment of wound repairing for fingertip defects.Methods From January 2015 to December 2016,there were 35 patients with fingertip defects underwent surgical treat-ment in our hospital,including 14 cases underwent surgery with anterograde digital artery island flap(anterograde group)and 21 cases under-went surgery with reverse digital artery island flap(reverse group).The anterograde group used proper palmar digital artery and nerve as the pedicle of flap,then took forward the finger pulp flap to the injured site.The reverse flap from the dorsal of one side of finger was harvested for coverage of the distal phalanx.Results All the flaps of the 35 cases were survived.In the anterograde group,reflux obstacle of vein appeared in 1 case,and it was cured with scarification procedures.In the reverse group,there were 3 cases of vascular crisis.After dressing release and partial remove of the stitching,2 cases of them return to normal.The other 1 case suffered from flap edge necrosis,and then the wound healed after dressing change.The operation time of anterograde group was(107.5 ±18.4)min and it was(139.5 ±18.0)min in the reverse group, which showed significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05).All the 35 cases were followed up for 6 to 12 months,with an average of 8.5 months.At the last follow-up,it showed that patients in both of the two groups had ruddy color,good texture and no significant bloated flap appearance.In the anterograde group,the sensory function of 12 patients restored to S4 and 2 patients restored to S3.Meanwhile,in re-verse group,5 patients restored to S3,12 patients restored to S2, and 4 patients restored to S1.The two-points discrimination of the antero-grade group was(4.22 ±0.67)mm,and it was(7.04 ±1.25)mm in the reverse group,which was significantly different(P<0.05).The in-terphalangeal joint motion was(102.67 ±7.35)°at the distal end and(64.46 ±8.37)°at the proximal end in anterograde group.And it was (100.64 ±10.29)°and(60.81 ±10.80)°respectively in the reverse group,with no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).The excellent and good rate was 92.8%in the anterograde group and 80.9%in the reverse group by the criteria for functional evaluation,and there was no statistically significant difference(P>0.05).Conclusion For fingertip defects(IshikawaⅠ~Ⅲ)treated by anterograde digital artery island flap or reverse digital artery island flap both can obtained good clinical efficacy.But it has shorter operation time and better sensory recovery with anterograde digital artery island flap repairing.