ABSTRACT
Objective To systematically evaluate the necessity of presetting double-J stent before flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy.Methods Computer retrieved clinical studies on the effect of preoperative presetting double-J-catheter on flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy in PubMed,Cochrane Library,Embase,Scopus,Wan fang,CNKI and VIP databases were reviewed.The retrieval time was from the database construction to November 2018.All of the possible combinations of the following terms were used for the search:flexible ureteroscopic,preoperative,double J stent,and calculus.Two researchers independently conducted literature screening,quality evaluation and data extraction,and completed Meta analysis by using statistical software RevMan5.3.Results Thirty-two case-control trials and 14 randomized controlled trials were screened,with a total of 17 480 patients,including 6 211 patients in the experimental group and 11 269 patients in the control group.The results of meta-analysis showed that the experimental group was superior to the control group in term of the overall postoperative stone clearance rate (OR =1.69,95％ CI 1.37-2.08,P ＜0.05).In terms of postoperative kidney stone removal rate,the experimental group was superior to the control group (OR =1.67,95％ CI 1.41-1.99,P ＜ 0.05).In terms of the removal rate of ureteral calculi after surgery,there was no significant difference between the two groups (OR =1.71,95％ CI 0.91-3.20,P =0.10).The success rate of flexible ureteroscope access sheath implantation was higher in the experimental group (OR =5.77,95％ CI 3.32-10.31,P ＜0.05).The rate of passive usage balloon dilation in the control group was higher (OR =0.23,95％ CI 0.15-0.35,P ＜ 0.05).For the incidence of intraoperative complications,the experimental group was lower (OR =0.56,95％ CI 0.38-0.84,P =0.004).For the incidence of postoperative complications,the experimental group was also lower (OR =0.64,95％ CI 0.45-0.90,P =0.01).The operation time of the control group was longer (MD =-4.95,95 ％ CI -8.90--1.01,P =0.01).Conclusions Presetting double-J-catheter can improve the stone removal rate after flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy for the treatment of kidney stone,improve the success rate of flexible ureteroscope access sheath implantation,reduce the utilization rate of ureteral balloon dilator,reduce the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications,and shorten the operation time.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the feasibility of the modified RUSS (Resorlu-Unsal Stone Score)renal stone scoring system in predicting the stone free rate after Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy(FURL).Methods Retrospective analysis was performed on 104 cases of renal stones treated by FURL from March 2017 to January 2019 in the second affiliated hospital of zhengzhou university,including 75 males and 29 females.Age 20-75 (47.79 ± 13.21) years.BMI 18.2-38.3 (24.4 ± 3.7) kg/m2;Crushed stone site:left 56 cases,right 48 cases.There were 23 cases of renal inferior calyces calculi,81 cases of non-inferior calyces calculi,and 19 cases of renal inferior calyces calculi with IPA ＜ 45°;American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores:65 cases of grade Ⅰ,39 cases of grade Ⅱ;There were 71 patients with urinary tract infection before operation.There were 6 cases of renal puncture fistula before operation.Preoperative indwelling ureteral stent in 26 cases;There were 32 cases with history of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.There were 27 patients with a history of urolithiasis therapy.The same physician used preoperative urinary CT + 3D reconstruction imaging data to measure the factors influencing the postoperative stone free rate.RUSS renal stone scoring system was used to score the stones of patients before operation,and the relationship between the scores and the stones free rate was analyzed.The RUSS renal stone scoring system was supplemented and improved by including staghorn stone,duplicate renal,caliceal diverticulum,renal malrotation,stone area,and CT value related indexes.The modified RUSS renal stone scoring system was used to score the preoperative stone condition of patients,and the relationship between the score and the stone free rate was analyzed.The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was drawn and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the modified RUSS,the characteristics of the stones,and RUSS system.Results The stone free rate was 69.2％ (72/104) 4 weeks after the operation,and there were no postoperative complications.Single-factor analysis showed that stone area,CT value,number of renal calyx involved by stone,multiple stones,IPA,stone size grading,renal anatomic structure abnormality,staghorn stone were all related risk factors affecting postoperative patients.Multi-factor analysis showed that stone area,number of renal calyces involved by stone,multiple stones,IPA and stone size were independent risk factors affecting the stone free rate after FURL.RUSS scores ranged from 0 to 3 points,corresponding to stone clearing rates of 86.8％ (33/38),67.7％ (23/34),58.3％ (14/24) and 25.0％ (2/8),respectively.Stone clearing rates were significantly correlated with stone grading (P ＜ 0.05).The total scores of stone free group and residual stone group were (0.87 ± 0.96) points and (1.53 ± 0.98) points,respectively,with significant differences between the groups (P ＜ 0.05).The range of modified RUSS score was 0-4 points,corresponding to the stone clearing rate of 100.0％ (25/25),92.3％ (24/26),54.2％ (13/24),47.4％ (9/19),and 10.0％ (1/10),respectively.Stone free rate was significantly correlated with stone grading (P ＜ 0.05).The total scores of stone free group and residual stone group were (1.15 ± 1.13) points and (2.81 ± 0.93) points,respectively,with significant differences between the groups (P ＜ 0.05).The AUC of stone features was smaller than that of the modified RUSS scoring system.The AUC of RUSS scoring system (0.707,95 ％ CI 0.598-0.815) was smaller than that of the modified RUSS scoring system (0.865,95％ CI 0.797-0.933).Conclusions Both the RUSS scoring system and the modified RUSS scoring system could accurately predict the postoperative stone free status of FURL,while the modified RUSS scoring was more accurate than the RUSS scoring.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To explore the feasibility of the modified RUSS (Resorlu-Unsal Stone Score) renal stone scoring system in predicting the stone free rate after Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy(FURL).@*Methods@#Retrospective analysis was performed on 104 cases of renal stones treated by FURL from March 2017 to January 2019 in the second affiliated hospital of zhengzhou university, including 75 males and 29 females. Age 20-75 (47.79±13.21) years. BMI 18.2-38.3 (24.4±3.7) kg/m2; Crushed stone site: left 56 cases, right 48 cases. There were 23 cases of renal inferior calyces calculi, 81 cases of non-inferior calyces calculi, and 19 cases of renal inferior calyces calculi with IPA<45°; American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores: 65 cases of grade Ⅰ, 39 cases of grade Ⅱ; There were 71 patients with urinary tract infection before operation. There were 6 cases of renal puncture fistula before operation. Preoperative indwelling ureteral stent in 26 cases; There were 32 cases with history of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. There were 27 patients with a history of urolithiasis therapy. The same physician used preoperative urinary CT+ 3D reconstruction imaging data to measure the factors influencing the postoperative stone free rate. RUSS renal stone scoring system was used to score the stones of patients before operation, and the relationship between the scores and the stones free rate was analyzed. The RUSS renal stone scoring system was supplemented and improved by including staghorn stone, duplicate renal, caliceal diverticulum, renal malrotation, stone area, and CT value related indexes. The modified RUSS renal stone scoring system was used to score the preoperative stone condition of patients, and the relationship between the score and the stone free rate was analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was drawn and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the modified RUSS, the characteristics of the stones, and RUSS system.@*Results@#The stone free rate was 69.2% (72/104) 4 weeks after the operation, and there were no postoperative complications. Single-factor analysis showed that stone area, CT value, number of renal calyx involved by stone, multiple stones, IPA, stone size grading, renal anatomic structure abnormality, staghorn stone were all related risk factors affecting postoperative patients. Multi-factor analysis showed that stone area, number of renal calyces involved by stone, multiple stones, IPA and stone size were independent risk factors affecting the stone free rate after FURL. RUSS scores ranged from 0 to 3 points, corresponding to stone clearing rates of 86.8% (33/38), 67.7% (23/34), 58.3% (14/24) and 25.0% (2/8), respectively. Stone clearing rates were significantly correlated with stone grading (P<0.05). The total scores of stone free group and residual stone group were (0.87±0.96) points and (1.53±0.98) points, respectively, with significant differences between the groups (P<0.05). The range of modified RUSS score was 0-4 points, corresponding to the stone clearing rate of 100.0% (25/25), 92.3% (24/26), 54.2% (13/24), 47.4% (9/19), and 10.0% (1/10), respectively. Stone free rate was significantly correlated with stone grading (P<0.05). The total scores of stone free group and residual stone group were (1.15±1.13) points and (2.81±0.93) points, respectively, with significant differences between the groups (P<0.05). The AUC of stone features was smaller than that of the modified RUSS scoring system. The AUC of RUSS scoring system (0.707, 95%CI 0.598-0.815) was smaller than that of the modified RUSS scoring system (0.865, 95%CI 0.797-0.933).@*Conclusions@#Both the RUSS scoring system and the modified RUSS scoring system could accurately predict the postoperative stone free status of FURL, while the modified RUSS scoring was more accurate than the RUSS scoring.
ABSTRACT
Purpose To evaluated the effect of ureteral stent placement before flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy(FURL).Methods A systematic search of PubMed,Cochrane Library,Embase,Scopus,VIP,CNKI,Wanfang database from databases establishment to February 2017 was performed to identify all clinical trials on the effect of ureteral stenting before flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy.The outcomes included stone-free rate,mean operative time,success rate of ureteral access sheath placement and postoperative complications.RevMan 5.3 software was used to complete the Meta statistical analysis.Results Three randomized and four non-randomized studies were analyzed,which consisted of 1 176 patients including 788 cases in experimental group,388 cases in control group.Meta-analysis showed significant differences between experimental group and control group in stone-free rate (OR =1.88,95％ CI 1.30-2.71,P ＜ 0.001).There was no statistically significant difference in mean operative time between experimental group and control group (WMD =-0.99,95 ％ CI-10.63-8.65,P =0.84).The success rate of ureteral access sheath placement was significantly higher in experimental group than that in the control group (OR =8.24,95％ CI 3.17-21.45,P ＜ 0.001).In term of postoperative complications,two groups had significant differences (OR =0.57,95 ％ CI 0.33-0.99,P =0.04).Conclusions Preoperative ureteral stenting can increase the stone-free rate and the success rate of ureteral access sheath placement,and reduce complications of FURL.There is no statistically significant difference in mean operative time.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the effect, postoperative inflammatory response, stress response differences of percutaneous nephrolithotomy ( PCNL) and flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy ( FURL) in the treatment of renal calculus with a diameter ≤2 cm. Methods One hundred and twenty-eight patients with renal calculus ≤2 cm m in Beijing Pinggu Hospital were enrolled in the study and were randomly divided into PCNL group( 64 cases ) and FURL group ( 64 cases ) . The treatment of PCNL and FURL was carried out respectively. The stone clearance rate,operation time,hospitalization time,the number of painkillers used after surgery,inflammatory index ( hs-CRP,IL-6),oxidative stress index ( MDA,SOD) were compared. Results There was no significant difference in the stone clearance rate between PCNL group and FURL group ( χ2= 0. 208,P>0. 05). The operation time of PCNL group was (55. 32±5. 80) min,which was shorter than that of FURL group ((65. 21± 4. 24) min), the difference was statistically significant ( t = 16. 322,P< 0. 01) . The hospitalization time of FURL group was (4. 50±1. 20) d,which was shorter than that of FURL group ((7. 40 ±1. 80)),the difference was statistically significant (t= 9. 441,P<0. 01). The number of painkillers used after surgery in the FURL group was (0. 35±0. 14) times,which was less than that in FURL group ((0. 85±0. 24) times),the difference was statistically significant ( t = 8. 625,P < 0. 01) . The postoperative hs-CRP of FURL group (10. 62±1. 26) mg was significantly lower than that in PCNL group (19. 42±1. 35) mg/ L,The difference was statistically significant (t= 12. 734,P<0. 01) . The postoperative IL-6 of FURL group was(31. 50±6. 57) ng/ L,significantly lower than the PCNL group(38. 72±6. 25) ng/ L,the difference was statistically significant (t= 5. 839,P<0. 01). The postoperative MDA of FURL group (0. 63±0. 17) mmol/ L was significantly lower than that of the PCNL group (0. 80±0. 20) mmol/ L,The difference was statistically significant (t= 4. 288,P<0. 01) . The postoperative SOD of FURL group (80. 40± 5. 80) U/ L was significantly higher than the PCNL group (74. 30± 7. 40) U/ L, the difference was statistically significant ( t = 4. 691, P <0. 01). The incidence of postoperative complications in PCNL group was 10. 94% ( 7/ 64), FURL group was 2. 17% ( 1/ 64), the difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 4. 800,P<0. 01). Conclusion FURL has the characteristics of less intraoperative blood loss,less trauma,less postoperative pain and fewer complications in the treatment of renal calculus ≤ 2 cm, which has less smaller inflammation, oxidative stress, and conducive to the patients' postoperative recovery.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the safety and efficacy of ureteral access sheath (UAS) with vacuum suction during flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of renal stones.Methods The clinical data on 56 patients with infectious renal stones who received flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy were retrospectively analyzed.The patients were randomly divided into group A (26 patients) and group B (30 patients).Intrapelvic pressure,stoneclearance rate,surgical duration,formation of steinstrasse,postoperative fever (temperature ＞ 38.5 ℃C),PCT,leukocyte count,length of hospital stay,and hospitalization cost were evaluated.Results Intrapelvic pressure was much lower in group A than in group B;stone clearance rate was 96.2％ for group A and 83.3％ for group B;and surgical duration was (80.1 ± 2.2) min and (105.2 ± 3.5) min,respectively.One patient developed steinstrasse and one had postoperative fever in group A,while six patients developed steinstrasse and 4 had postoperative fever in group B;PCT and leukocyte count was much lower in group A than in group B.There were statistical differences between the two groups (P ＜ 0.05).The length of hospital stay and hospitalization cost were (7.4 ± 0.8)d and (20857.1 ± 389.4) RMB for group A and (8.2±1.3)d and (22008.5±394.3) RMB;but there were no statistical differences between the two groups (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions Application of ureteral access sheath with vacuum suction during flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of renal stones was safe and effective.It can shorten surgical duration,improve stoneclearance rate and reduce incidence of adverse reactions.This procedure has better value of clinical application.
ABSTRACT
Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) and flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURL) in management of lower pole kidney stones.Methods PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane library, CNKI, VIP and Wanfang Data were searched from the beginning of database to September 2016 and clinical trials that compared the two above operation for treatment of lower pole stones were collected.Two researchers independently filtered literature,extracted data and evaluated the methodological quality of research papers.The meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.3 software.Results One randomized and seven non-randomized studies were analyzed, which consists of 621 patients including MPCNL group 327 cases, FURL group 294 cases.The results of meta-analysis showed that MPCNL was better than FURL in stones clearance (OR =2.65,95％ CI 1.58-4.46,P ＜ 0.01) and operative time (WMD =-21.86,95％ CI-28.52--15.20, P ＜ 0.01).FURL was better in hospital stay time (WMD =2.28,95％ CI 0.29-4.28, P =0.02), decrease in haemoglobin levels (WMD =0.78,95 ％ CI 0.68-0.89, P ＜ 0.01), bleeding (OR =5.11,95 ％ CI 1.12-23.31,P =0.04), transfusion(OR =7.04,95％ CI 1.59-31.15, P =0.01).There was no significant difference in fever,urinary tract infection, hematuria (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions Both MPCN and FURL are safe and effective for the treatment of lower pole stones, MPCNL can get higher stone clearance rates and shorter operation time.However, FURL can get shorter hospitalization time and lower complication rates.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the effects of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating renal pelvis calculus.Methods The clinical diagnosis and treatment data in 65 patients with single renal pelvis calculus treated in department of urology surgery of our hospital from Jan.2013 to Jan.2016.Among them,33 casesas the group A adopted flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy and 32 cases as the group B adopted percutaneous nephrolithotomy.The operative time,lithotripsy success rate,complications and average hospitalization time were compared between the two groups.Results In the renal pelvis calculus diameter ≥ 2 cm,the operation time and lithotripsy success rate in the group B were significantly better than those in the group A,but the intraoperative blood loss and average hospitalization time in the group A were significantly better than those in the group B,the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05).In renal pelvis calculus diameter ≤2 cm,the lithotripsy successful rate had no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P＞0.05),but the group A was significantly better than the group B in the operative time,intraoperative blood loss and average hospitalization time (P＜0.05).Conclusion Renal pelvis calculus diameter ＜2 cm is suitable for selecting flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy,but which ≥2 cm is suitable to select percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy combined with percutaneous nephrolithotomy treating for partial staghorn calculi.Methods 84 patients diagnosed as partial staghorn calculi in our hospital were randomly divided into group A and B with each group 42 patients.Patients in group A received the conventional minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone position,and patients in group B received the percutaneous nephrolithotomy combined with flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the modified Valdivia position.The post-operative stone free rate and complications were recorded.Results The surgery time in group B was longer than that in group A [(106.44±18.46)min vs(83.69±10.29)min],with statistically significant difference(P38.5℃),but there was no notably difference between the two group(P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with the regular percutaneous nephrolithotomy,flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy combined with percutaneous nephrolithotomy treating partial staghorn calculi has the shorter operation time,the less blood volume and the higher first stone free rate.Furthermore,the combination method did not significantly increasing the incidence of patient's complication.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the application value of a pressure-measuring and stone-extracting ureteral access sheath (UAS) used together with negative pressure suction system during flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal caculus.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the 98 cases of renal caculus who received flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy (FURS) in the Department of Urology of the Kunming General Hospital of Chengdu Military Command from November 2014 to September 2015,and the enrolled cases were divided into two groups:group A and group B.The new UAS was used in group A combined with vacuum suction during lithotripsy,and simple manometry type UAS was used in group B.The infusion pump flow rate of 0.2 L/min was set in the operation,the perfusion pressure limit was set to 100 mmHg,the suction pressure of group A was 10 kPa.Perfusion flow rate and pressure was adjusted in a timely manner based on the clear vision and the internal pressure force on the kidney.Then we recorded and compared the internal pressure and variation trend of renal and perfusion time of two groups.Results Two groups of patients were successfully completed surgery.The renal pressures in group A were adjusted duly and were lower than the that in group B in the whole process of operation.The average renal pressure in group A was 10.88 ± 5.91 1mmHg.The average renal pressure in group B was 20.10 ± 7.68 mmHg,the pressure control was difficult and unsteady.Conclusion The new type of UAS in the flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy (FURS) can make the renal pressure in surgery controllable and is safe for the FURS.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the effect and safety of digital flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy and per-cutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal calculi. Methods Clinic data of 105 cases with kidney stones were analyzed retrospectively, including 53 cases with digital flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (group A) and 52 with minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (group B). The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, stone-free rate, complications, average hospitalization time were compared. Results There were no significant differences in age, gender, stone size, stone surface area, average operative time, stone-free rate and complications between two groups. Significant differences were found between group A and group B in terms of intraoperative blood loss and average hospitalization time. Conclusions Digital flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy has similar effect as minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones about 20 mm in terms of average operative time, stone-free rate, and complications, but excels minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in intraopera-tive blood loss and average hospitalization time. Digital flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy can be the first choice for the treatment of kidney stones about 20 mm.
ABSTRACT
Objective To assess the impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on outcome of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy . Methods The clinic data of flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy were analyzed retrospectively .All 52 eligible patients were divided into three group :goup A(no preoperative ureteral stenting );group B (preoperative ureteral stenting for 3-10 days);group C(preopera‐tive ureteral stenting for two weeks or more ) .The application of ureteral access sheath ,operation time ,stone free rates ,hospital stays ,complications were compared among the three groups .Results There were no significant differences in aging ,gender ,stone size , distribution ,average hospitalization days ,postoperative complications among the three groups (P>0 .05) .There were significantly differ‐ences between group A and group B ,group C(P0 .05) on the suc‐cess rate of indwelling ureteral access sheath ,average operation time ,stone free rate .Conclusion Preoperative ureteral stenting could en‐hance the success rate of indwelling ureteral access sheath ,shorten the operation time ,improve the stone free rate .There was similar out‐come of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy between preoperative ureteral stenting for 3-10 days and two weeks or more .