Efficacy and safety of flumatinib in treatment of imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant patients with chronic myeloid leukemia / 白血病·淋巴瘤

Objective:To investigate the efficacy and safety of flumatinib in the treatment of imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant patients with chronic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML-CP).Methods:The clinical data of 9 CML-CP patients who received flumatinib after imatinib resistance or intolerance in Jining No. 1 People's Hospital from April 2020 to May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were evaluated for the hematologic, cytogenetic and molecular responses, progression-free survival (PFS), event-free survival (EFS), and adverse reactions.Results:Among 9 CML-CP patients, there were 4 imatinib-resistant patients and 5 imatinib-intolerant patients. The median duration of flumatinib exposure was 17 months (1-25 months). Except for 1 case who discontinued flumatinib early due to grade 4 thrombocytopenia and other adverse reactions, 7 of the remaining 8 cases achieved the best response at 3, 6 and 12 months of flumatinib therapy. By the end of follow-up in April 2022, 7, 7 and 6 patients achieved complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), major molecular response (MMR) and molecular response 4.5 (MR4.5), respectively. The median time to achieving CCyR, MMR and MR4.5 was 4.5 months (3-6 months), 12 months (3-12 months) and 15 months (3-21 months), respectively. Within 17 months (11-25 months) of follow-up, 7 of the 9 patients had EFS and 8 patients with continuous flumatinib had PFS. Among 9 patients treated with flumatinib, hematologic adverse reactions were observed in 6 cases, and grade 3-4 hematologic adverse reactions occurred in 2 cases. Non-hematologic reactions events mainly included diarrhea (4 cases), muscle ache (2 cases), fatigue (2 cases) and liver damage (2 cases), which were all grade 1-2.Conclusions:Flumatinib is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant CML-CP patients.

To compare the efficacy and incidence of severe hematological adverse events of flumatinib and imatinib in patients newly diagnosed with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia / 中华血液学杂志

Objective: To analyze and compare therapy responses, outcomes, and incidence of severe hematologic adverse events of flumatinib and imatinib in patients newly diagnosed with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) . Methods: Data of patients with chronic phase CML diagnosed between January 2006 and November 2022 from 76 centers, aged ≥18 years, and received initial flumatinib or imatinib therapy within 6 months after diagnosis in China were retrospectively interrogated. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to reduce the bias of the initial TKI selection, and the therapy responses and outcomes of patients receiving initial flumatinib or imatinib therapy were compared. Results: A total of 4 833 adult patients with CML receiving initial imatinib (n=4 380) or flumatinib (n=453) therapy were included in the study. In the imatinib cohort, the median follow-up time was 54 [interquartile range (IQR), 31-85] months, and the 7-year cumulative incidences of CCyR, MMR, MR(4), and MR(4.5) were 95.2%, 88.4%, 78.3%, and 63.0%, respectively. The 7-year FFS, PFS, and OS rates were 71.8%, 93.0%, and 96.9%, respectively. With the median follow-up of 18 (IQR, 13-25) months in the flumatinib cohort, the 2-year cumulative incidences of CCyR, MMR, MR(4), and MR(4.5) were 95.4%, 86.5%, 58.4%, and 46.6%, respectively. The 2-year FFS, PFS, and OS rates were 80.1%, 95.0%, and 99.5%, respectively. The PSM analysis indicated that patients receiving initial flumatinib therapy had significantly higher cumulative incidences of CCyR, MMR, MR(4), and MR(4.5) and higher probabilities of FFS than those receiving the initial imatinib therapy (all P<0.001), whereas the PFS (P=0.230) and OS (P=0.268) were comparable between the two cohorts. The incidence of severe hematologic adverse events (grade≥Ⅲ) was comparable in the two cohorts. Conclusion: Patients receiving initial flumatinib therapy had higher cumulative incidences of therapy responses and higher probability of FFS than those receiving initial imatinib therapy, whereas the incidence of severe hematologic adverse events was comparable between the two cohorts.

Efficacy and Safety of Flumatinib in Treatment of Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia / 中国实验血液学杂志

OBJECTIVE@#To analyze the efficacy and safety of flumatinib in the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).@*METHODS@#The clinical data of 56 CML patients treated with flumatinib from January 2020 to December 2021 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups: 35 new diagnosed CML patients treated with flumatinib (group A), 10 patients with imatinib/dasatinib intolerance (group B) and 11 patients with imatinib/dasatinib resistance (group C) switched to flumatinib treatment, respectively. The molecular response and adverse effects of flumatinib treatment were evaluated.@*RESULTS@#In group A, the early molecular response (EMR) at 3 months was 40.0%, and the major molecular response (MMR) at 6 and 12 months was 43.7% and 46.2%, respectively. In group B, the EMR was 50.0% at 3 months, and the MMR was 70.0% and 66.2% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Among evaluable patients, 6 cases in group B achieved molecular response of 4.5 (MR4.5) at 12 months after switching to flumatinib treatment. In group C, 3 cases who switched from imatinib resistance to flumatinib achieved MR4.5 at 12 months, but 2 cases who switched from dasatinib resistance to flumatinib failed. Subgroup analysis showed significant differences in EUTOS long-term survival (ELTS) scores for patients in the medium-risk/high-risk group compared with those in the low-risk group for 3-month EMR (18.8% vs 57.9%), 6-month MMR (15.4% vs 63.2%) and 12-month MR4.5 (15.4% vs 69.2%) (P =0.036, P =0.012,P =0.015). The most common adverse effect in group A was thrombocytopenia, accounting for 54.5%, and 22.8% (8/35) patients discontinued the drug due to haematological adverse effects. Compared with patients who did not discontinue the drug or whose recovery time from discontinuation due to haematological toxicity was <1 month, patients whose recovery time from discontinuation was ≥1 month had a significantly worse 3-month EMR, 6-month MMR and 12-month MR4.5 (P =0.028, P =0.021, P =0.002).@*CONCLUSIONS@#Flumatinib has better molecular response and tolerance in patients with primary, imatinib/dasatinib-intolerant or resistant CML. Medium-risk/high-risk in ELTS score and time to recovery from discontinuation due to haematological toxicity ≥1 month are important factors influencing achievement of better molecular response in flumatinib treatment.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety between flumatinib and imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia / 白血病·淋巴瘤

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety between flumatinib and imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Methods A multi-center, randomized and parallel comparison clinical trial was conducted in 24 newly diagnosed patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML-chronic phase (Ph+ CML-CP) who were treated by flumatinib 400 mg/d, 600 mg/d or imatinib for 6 cycles (24 weeks). The hematology was evaluated at pre-medication and the 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, 10th, 12th, 16th, 20th, 24th week of post-medication. The morphology, cytogenetics and molecular biology were evaluated at pre-medication and 12th, 24th week of post-medication. Results In terms of efficacy, the main molecular remission (MMR) rate of flumatinib 600 mg/d group was higher than that of imatinib group after 24 weeks [44.44 % (4/9) vs. 14.29 % (1/7), P=0.017]. The rate of bcr-ablIS≤10 % in flumatinib 600 mg/d group was significantly higher than that in imatinib group (P=0.002). PK/PD analysis also hinted that patients treated by flumatinib 600 mg/d was more likely to get molecular reaction in the early stage compared with those treated by flumatinib 400 mg/d. In terms of safety, there was no significant difference in grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ of adverse events among flumatinib 400 mg/d group, flumatinib 600 mg/d group and imatinib group (P >0.05). The common adverse events in flumatinib group included skin toxicity, gastrointestinal reactions and diarrhea.There was no heart and cardiovascular toxicity in flumatinib group, and incidence of edema in flumatinib group was lower than that in imatinib group. Conclusions Flumatinib is a safe and effective drug for newly diagnosed patients with Ph+ CML-CP, and 600 mg/d is the appropriate clinical starting dose. Flumatinib and imatinib have similar safety in clinic.