ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: For patients with cervical spondylosis who fail to receive conservative treatment, cervical anterior decompression and fusion has always been the gold standard for surgical treatment. Since its use, it has been widely recognized by clinicians for its simple and convenient intraoperative operation and significant relief of pathological segmental symptoms after surgery. As time goes by, the problem of degeneration of surgery adjacent segments and loss of mobility of the replacement segments is gradually exposed. At the same time, the patient's requirements for postoperative rehabilitation and quality of life are constantly improving, and surgical technology continues to develop rapidly. This type of surgery cannot meet the clinical needs. Therefore, total cervical disc replacement surgery comes into being, which can solve the related problems caused by anterior cervical decompression and fusion, and the clinical effect is better than previous one. OBJECTIVE: To review the research status of artificial cervical intervertebral discs, to focus on its clinical effects and structure, and to prospect its improvement and development direction of artificial development direction. METHODS: A compute-based retrieval of CNKI, WanFang and PubMed databases was conducted for articles published between January 1995 and August 2019. The keywords were "non-fusion technique, artificial intervertebral disc, clinical efficacy, structure" in Chinese and English, respectively. The articles related to artificial cervical intervertebral disc were selected, and the latest experimental and clinical researches were preferred. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) Through analyzing the main artificial cervical discs on the market, the research of artificial cervical discs will focus on materials, structures, implantation devices and surgical approaches of prosthesis. The domestic cervical disc will be designed based on the anatomical features of the Chinese cervical spine. (2) It is believed that the future cervical disc replacement surgery will achieve a satisfactory clinical effect, and its postoperative complications will be significantly reduced, which can meet the requirements of Chinese people.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To explore whether MRI fusion technology (combined T2-weighted imaging [T2WI] and fat-suppressed T2WI [T2WI-(FS)]) improves signal differences between anal fistulas and surrounding structures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 32 patients with confirmed diagnoses of anal fistula were retrospectively studied. All available T2WI and T2WI-(FS) images for each patient were used to generate fusion image (T2WI-(Fusion)) based on the addition of gray values obtained from each pixel via an MR post-processing work station. The discriminability of fistula, perianal sphincter, and perianal fat in T2WI, T2WI-(FS), and T2WI-(Fusion) images was quantified with Fisher's scoring algorithm. For subjective visual image assessment by researchers, five-point scale scores were determined using a modified double-stimulus continuous quality-scale test to evaluate T2WI-(FS), T2WI, enhanced axial three-dimensional-volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (3D-VIBE), and T2WI-(Fusion) sequence images. The differences were subsequently compared. RESULTS: Mean Fisher scores for fistulas vs. sphincters obtained from T2WI-(Fusion) (F(Fusion-fistula) = 6.56) were significantly higher than those from T2WI (F(T2WI-fistula) = 3.35) (p = 0.001). Mean Fisher scores for sphincters vs. fat from T2WI-(Fusion) (F(Fusion-sphincter) = 10.84) were significantly higher than those from T2WI-(FS) (FS(FS-sphincter) = 2.57) (p = 0.001). In human assessment, T2WI-(Fusion) showed the same fistula discriminability as T2WI-(FS), and better sphincter discriminability than T2WI. Overall, T2WI-(Fusion) showed better discriminability than T2WI, T2WI-(FS), and enhanced 3D-VIBE images. CONCLUSION: T2WI and T2WI-(FS) fusion technology improves signal differences between anal fistulas and surrounding structures, and may facilitate better evaluation of anal fistulas and sphincters.
Subject(s)
Humans , Anal Canal , Diagnosis , Fistula , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Rectal Fistula , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Objective To explore the safety and efficacy of fusion imaging technique and traditional ultrasound guidance in percutaneous nephrolithotomy,and to compare the difference of two methods for PCNL.Methods Patients with renal calculus,who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy from January 2016 to August 2016,were enrolled in the study.The patients were randomly divided into two groups by SAS software.The control group was treated with traditional ultrasound guided puncture technique (Ultrasound group).Experimental group was treated with fusion imaging method (CT-US group).Preoperative patient CT image data was uploaded to the image fusion ultrasound machine for data synchronization.Both groups used the same way to establish a standard channel (F24).Lithoclast system from EMS was used to remove stones.Intraoperative parameters (time to define the target calyx,access establishment time,operative duration) and postoperative perioperative data (estimated blood loss,stone-free rate,severe complications) were compared between the two groups.Results 65 cases of patients were enrolled into the study.There was no significant difference in age (P =0.72),body mass index (P =0.78),stone size (P =0.53) and so on.Compared with the control group,the time duration to define the target calyx in CT-US group is significantly decreased in experiment group(50.4 ± 18.1) s vs.(82.1 ± 37.7) s,(P =0.02).The time to establish the access and fulfill the procedure shows no significant difference between the two groups,respectvely(P =0.45,0.61).Also,significant differences can be found in the hemoglobin loss during and after the surgery(1.1 ± 0.5) g/L vs.(1.4 ± 0.4) g/L (P =0.04).The difference in severe complications (Clavien Ⅲ and above),stone-free rate (P =0.60) and transfusion rate (P =1.00) was not significant.Conclusions Our primary study shows CT-altrasound image fusion guide PCNL is a safe and reliable technology.The time duration to define the target calyx was decreased compared with traditional US guidance method.The target calyx chosen was more accurate,with lower blood loss during the perioperative period.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the safety and efficacy of fusion imaging technique and traditional ultrasound guidance in percutaneous nephrolithotomy,and to compare the difference of two methods for PCNL.Methods Patients with renal calculus,who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy from January 2016 to August 2016,were enrolled in the study.The patients were randomly divided into two groups by SAS software.The control group was treated with traditional ultrasound guided puncture technique (Ultrasound group).Experimental group was treated with fusion imaging method (CT-US group).Preoperative patient CT image data was uploaded to the image fusion ultrasound machine for data synchronization.Both groups used the same way to establish a standard channel (F24).Lithoclast system from EMS was used to remove stones.Intraoperative parameters (time to define the target calyx,access establishment time,operative duration) and postoperative perioperative data (estimated blood loss,stone-free rate,severe complications) were compared between the two groups.Results 65 cases of patients were enrolled into the study.There was no significant difference in age (P =0.72),body mass index (P =0.78),stone size (P =0.53) and so on.Compared with the control group,the time duration to define the target calyx in CT-US group is significantly decreased in experiment group(50.4 ± 18.1) s vs.(82.1 ± 37.7) s,(P =0.02).The time to establish the access and fulfill the procedure shows no significant difference between the two groups,respectvely(P =0.45,0.61).Also,significant differences can be found in the hemoglobin loss during and after the surgery(1.1 ± 0.5) g/L vs.(1.4 ± 0.4) g/L (P =0.04).The difference in severe complications (Clavien Ⅲ and above),stone-free rate (P =0.60) and transfusion rate (P =1.00) was not significant.Conclusions Our primary study shows CT-altrasound image fusion guide PCNL is a safe and reliable technology.The time duration to define the target calyx was decreased compared with traditional US guidance method.The target calyx chosen was more accurate,with lower blood loss during the perioperative period.