ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) combined with delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with direct LC in the treatment of acute cholecystitis.Methods:A single-center case-control retrospective study was used. Sixty-three patients with acute cholecystitis with onset time ≥ 72 hours during the period from August 1, 2021 to December 10, 2022 in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery of the 900TH Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force were selected. There were 38 males and 25 females, aged (57.3±15.4) years, with an age range of 28-87 years. According to whether PTGBD treatment was performed before LC, they were divided into experimental group ( n=29) and control group ( n=34). Experimental group was treated with PTGBD combined with delayed LC and control group was treated with LC only.The differences in operative time, intra-operative bleeding, intra-operative transit open rate, post-operative hospital days, total hospital days, hospital costs, short-term post-operative complications of LC and post-operative time to exhaustion were compared and analysed between the two groups. Measurement data with normal distribution were expressed as mean±standard deviation ( ± s), and independent sample t-test was used for comparison between groups.Measurement data with skewed distribution were expressed as M( Q1, Q3), and rank sum test was used for comparison between groups; Chi-square test was used to compare the counting data groups. Results:Intraoperative bleeding, total hospital days, hospital costs and postoperative time to exhaustion were 0(0, 50) mL, 13(11, 18) d, 29 015.0 (22 791.6, 39 000.8) yuan and 1(1, 2) d in the experimental group and 50(0, 88) mL, 7(6, 11) d, 16 015.0 (15 832.1, 22 185.1) yuan, 2(1, 3) d, the difference was statistically significant between the two groups( P<0.05). In the experimental group, the operative time, the intraoperative transit open rate, the number of postoperative hospital days, and the incidence of short-term postoperative complications of LC were 80 (55, 115) min, 13.8%, 5 (3, 7) days, 34.5%, respectively, compared with 98(70, 125) min, 20.6%, 5(3, 6) days, 38.2% in the control group, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). Conclusion:The clinical efficacy of PTGBD combined with delayed LC is better than direct line LC, and it is feasible and effective for patients with cholecystitis whose inflammatory indexes have returned to normal and who have high gallbladder tone.
ABSTRACT
Occasionally, cholecystectomy is not possible because the patient is not suitable for surgery, and non-operative management should be performed. In these patients, the non-operative management can be through the percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) or the endoscopic gallbladder drainage. We decided to compare the efficacy and safety of PTGBD and EUS-GBD in the non-operative management of patients with acute cholecystitis. We conducted a systematic review in different databases, such as PubMed, OVID, Medline, and Cochrane Databases. This meta-analysis considers studies published until September 2021. Six studies were selected (2 RCTs). These studies included 749 patients. The mean age was 72.81 ±7.41 years, and males represented 57.4%. EUS-GBD technical success was lower than PTGBD (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99), whereas clinical success and adverse events rates were similar in both groups. Twenty-one deaths were reported in all six studies. The global mortality rate was 2.80%, without differences in both groups (2.84% and 2.77% in the EUS-GBD group and the PTGBD groups, respectively). EUS-GBD and PTGBD were successful techniques for gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis who are non-tributary for surgery. EUS-GBD has a similar clinical success rate and a similar adverse events rate in comparison to PTGBD. The high technical success and the low adverse events rate of the EUS approach to gallbladder make this technique an excellent alternative for patients with acute cholecystitis who cannot be undergoing surgery.
En ocasiones, no es posible realizar una colecistectomía debido a que el paciente no es apto para la cirugía, y se debe optar por un manejo no quirúrgico. En estos pacientes, el manejo no quirúrgico puede ser a través del drenaje transhepático percutáneo de la vesícula o bien el drenaje ecoendoscópico de la misma. En el presente trabajo decidimos comparar la eficacia y seguridad de ambas técnicas en el manejo no quirúrgico de pacientes con colecistitis aguda. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión sistemática en diferentes bases de datos, como PubMed, OVID, Medline y Cochrane Databases. Este metanálisis considera estudios publicados hasta septiembre de 2021. Se seleccionaron seis estudios (2 estudios aleatorizados controlados). Estos estudios incluyeron 749 pacientes. La edad media fue de 72,81 ± 7,41 años, y los varones representaron el 57,4%. El éxito técnico del drenaje ecoendoscópico fue menor que el del drenaje percutáneo (RR, 0,97; IC del 95 %, 0,95-0,99), mientras que las tasas de éxito clínico y de eventos adversos fueron similares en ambos grupos. Se reportaron 21 muertes en los seis estudios. La tasa de mortalidad global fue del 2,80%, sin diferencias en ambos grupos (2,84% y 2,77% en el grupo ecoendoscópico y en el percutáneo, respectivamente). El drenaje ecoendoscópico y el drenaje percutáneo fueron técnicas exitosas para el drenaje de la vesícula biliar en pacientes con colecistitis aguda que no son tributarios de cirugía. El drenaje ecoendoscópico tiene una tasa de éxito clínico similar y una tasa de eventos adversos similar al drenaje percutáneo. El alto éxito técnico y la baja tasa de eventos adversos del abordaje ecoendoscópico de la vesícula biliar hacen de esta técnica una excelente alternativa para pacientes con colecistitis aguda que no pueden ser intervenidos quirúrgicamente.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC) after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) in acute cholecystitis.Methods:Clinical data of 64 patients who were diagnosed moderate (grade Ⅱ) acute cholecystitis by the 2018 Tokyo Guidelines in acute phase and underwent delayed LC at our hospital from Jan 2018 to Jan 2021 were compared between two groups ie PTGBD treatment (21 cases)in acute stage before DLC and DLC without PTGBD group (43 cases). The difficulty score of TG18 was used to evaluated every surgical procedure of the cases by reviewing the operation videos.Results:Patients in DLC after PTGBD group had a longer hospital stay and operation time, more blood lose and higher difficulty score than the DLC without PTGBD group(all P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the conversion rate and morbidity rate between the two groups( P>0.05). Conclusion:This study fails to show there is any if ever benefit of PTGBD before DLC over DLC without PTGBD in the management of Grade Ⅱ acute cholecystitis.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To study the optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) for grade Ⅱ-Ⅲ acute cholecystitis.Methods:A multicenter, single blind and randomized controlled study was conducted at Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai Pudong Hospital, and Shanghai Minhang District Central Hospital from October 2018 to September 2021. Patients who underwent LC after PTGBD were divided 1∶1 into the early group and the late group. LC was performed 4-6 weeks after PTGBD in the early group and 7-8 weeks after PTGBD in the late group. Gender, age, AC grade, complications after PTGBD, body mass index, complications before LC, operation time of LC, intraoperative bleeding, total treatment cost, conversion rate to open surgery and complications after LC were compared between the two groups. The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) before and after LC was also compared.Results:Of 248 patients who were eligible for the study, there were 52 males and 196 females, with ages ranging from 18 to 89 years, and mean ±s.d. of (52.5 ± 20.2) years. There were 126 patients in the early group and 122 patients in the late group. There were no significant differences in gender, age, AC grade, body mass index and complications before LC between the two groups (all P>0.05). The preoperative score of SF-36 in the early group was significantly better than that in late group, and the complications of PTGBD in the late group were significantly higher than the early group (both P<0.05). The operation time and total treatment cost of the early group were significantly less than those of the late group (37.2±12.8 min vs. 48.5±19.7 min, 20 856±2 136 yuan vs. 2 2207±2 049 yuan) (both P<0.05). The intraoperative bleeding volume of LC in the early group was [ M( Q1, Q3)] 40 (40, 60) ml and the late group was [ M( Q1, Q3)] 35 (25, 40) ml. The difference was also significant ( P<0.05). There was no significant differences in the conversion rates to open surgery, complications and SF-36 scores after LC between the two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusion:LC should be performed 4-6 weeks after PTGBD for grade Ⅱ-Ⅲ acute cholecystitis. Although the amount of intraoperative bleeding was higher, the operation time was shorter, the burden on patients was reduced and there was more rapid recovery.
ABSTRACT
The fundamental treatment for acute cholecystitis is surgical cholecystectomy, especially laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Some high-risk surgical patients need gallbladder drainage. The traditional drainage method is percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage. However, in recent years, two endoscopic approaches, including endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage, have developed rapidly and have advantages in long-term outcomes. In this article, the authors discuss the historical development, technical characteristics, comparison between methods , adverse events and long-term outcomes of the two endoscopic drainage methods through literature review.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To study the optimal surgical timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) for acute cholecystitis.Methods:A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of patients with acute cholecystitis who were treated at Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University from April 2016 to October 2020 with initial PTGBD followed by LC. These patients were divided into three groups according to the time intervals between LC with PTGBD. Patients who underwent LC 3~4 weeks after PTGBD were in the short interval group ( n=67); patients who underwent LC 5~8 weeks after PTGBD were in the intermediate interval group ( n=78); and patients who underwent LC>8 weeks after PTGBD were in the long interval group ( n=73). The baseline and perioperative data of the three groups were compared. Results:In 218 patients, 97 were males and 121 were females, aged (72.1±8.4) years. Before LC, the gallbladder wall in the short interval group (4.77±0.62) mm was significantly thicker than that in the intermediate interval group (3.85±0.34) mm and the long interval group (3.81±0.25) mm (all P<0.05). Intraoperative blood loss in the intermediate interval group was significantly less than that in the short interval group ( P<0.05). The operation time, conversion to laparotomy, placement of drainage tube, postoperative hospital stay and total hospitalization expenses in the intermediate interval group were significantly better than those in the other two groups (all P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the intermediate interval group was significantly lower than that in the short interval group [2.56% (2/78) vs. 14.93% (10/67)], and the long interval group [2.56% (2/78) vs. 12.33% (9/73), all P<0.05]. Conclusion:The best timing for sequential LC after PTGBD in acute cholecystitis was shown in this study to be 5 to 8 weeks after PTGBD.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To compare laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with or without percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGD) for acute severe cholecystitis.@*Methods@#According to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 23 articles were selected for this meta-analysis. All patients were treated with LC with or without PTGD. A meta-analysis was used to analyze the clinical efficacy.@*Results@#Compared with LC, all the surgical indicators of LC with PTGD were significantly better than LC alone (all P≤0.05), including the operation time: 95%CI(-27.24, -9.27); intraoperative blood loss: 95%CI(-50.25, -40.19); postoperative hospital stay: 95%CI(-3.63, -0.64); rates of conversion to open abdomen: OR=0.48, 95%CI(0.32, 0.74); rates of incision infection: OR=0.49, 95%CI(0.25, 0.99); drainage tube indwelling time: 95%CI(-2.07, -1.19); gastrointestinal function recovery time: 95%CI(-1.73, -0.77); rates of bile leakage: OR=0.23, 95%CI(0.12, 0.44); and rates of complications: OR=0.36, 95%CI(0.27, 0.48).@*Conclusion@#Compared with LC alone, PTGD+ LC is the preferred treatment for acute severe cholecystitis.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: It is often difficult to manage acute cholecystitis after metal stent (MS) placement in unresectable malignant biliary strictures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) for acute cholecystitis. METHODS: The clinical outcomes of 10 patients who underwent EUS-GBD for acute cholecystitis after MS placement between January 2011 and August 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. The procedural outcomes of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) with tube placement (n=11 cases) and aspiration (PTGBA) (n=27 cases) during the study period were evaluated as a reference. RESULTS: The technical success and clinical effectiveness rates of EUS-GBD were 90% (9/10) and 89% (8/9), respectively. Severe bile leakage that required surgical treatment occurred in one case. Acute cholecystitis recurred after stent dislocation in 38% (3/8) of the cases. Both PTGBD and PTGBA were technically successful in all cases without severe adverse events and clinically effective in 91% and 63% of the cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-GBD after MS placement was a feasible option for treating acute cholecystitis. However, it was a rescue technique following the established percutaneous intervention in the current setting because of the immature technical methodology, including dedicated devices, which need further development.
Subject(s)
Humans , Bile , Cholecystitis, Acute , Constriction, Pathologic , Joint Dislocations , Drainage , Gallbladder , Retrospective Studies , Stents , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Objective@#To investigate the timing of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for acute pyogenic cholecystitis in the advanced age.@*Methods@#The clinical data for 56 advanced age patients with acute pyogenic cholecystitis in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the 900th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of People′s Liberation Army from January 2018 to February 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 31 males and 25 females, aged from 70 to 86 years, with average age was (75.52±3.57) years. According to the percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage(PTGD) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) time interval, all patients were divided into three groups. Patients in the group A(n=12), B(n=21), and C (n=23) performed LC were within 2 months, during 2-4 months, and during 4-6 months, retrospectively. Observation indicators: (1) Surgical situations. The operation and postoperative basic condition of the three groups were compared. (2) Follow-up situations. Patients were followed-up by outpatient examination or telephone interview to detect the postoperative complication in the postoperative three months up to June 2019. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as (Mean±SD), and comparison multiple groups was done using single factor analysis of variance (AVONA test) , and comparison between groups was done using the t test, and comparison of multiple groups in pairs was done using the SNK-q test, and hierarchical data were analyzed using Kruskal-wallis H test. Count data were analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability.@*Results@#(1) Surgical situations: the thickness of gallbladder wall before LC, the rates of converting to laparotomy, the volume of intraoperative blood loss, the operation duration, and the duration of postoperative hospital stay were (0.57±0.04) cm, 50.0%, (95.83±11.45) ml, (107.50±21.90) min, (5.67±3.40) d in the group A, and (0.43±0.03) cm, 9.5%, (69.52±24.59) ml, (71.43±12.16) min, (3.76±2.61) d in the group B, and (0.43±0.05) cm, 39.1%, (68.64±21.89) ml, (77.95±12.88) min, (5.05±2.95) d in the group C, respectively, showing significant differences in the above indicators between the three groups (P<0.05). The thickness of gallbladder wall before LC, the volume of intraoperative blood loss, the operation duration, those in group A were higher than the group B and C (P<0.05), and with no statistically significant different between the group B and C (P>0.05). The rates of converting to laparotomy, the duration of postoperative hospital stay in group B were better than the group A and C (P<0.05), and with no statistically significant different between the group A and C (P>0.05). The thickness of gallbladder wall before LC, the volume of intraoperative blood loss, the operation duration, and the duration of postoperative hospital stay were (0.43±0.03) cm, (46.67±9.82) ml, (67.69±7.77) min, (2.64±0.58) d in the gallbladder wall thickness of successful LC patients, and (0.52±0.04) cm, (123.53±17.30) ml, (134.12±25.51) min, (8.47±0.80) d in the laparotomy patients, respectively, showing significant differences in the above indicators between the two groups (P<0.05). (2) Follow-up situations: 56 patients were followed up and without perioperative death. No complications occurred after 3 months of follow-up.@*Conclusion@#Elective surgery that is performed in 2-4 months after PTGD for patients with acute pyogenic cholecystitis in the advanced age can reduce the volume of intraoperative blood loss and the rates of converting to laparotomy, shorten the operation duration and the duration of postoperative hospital stay, which is beneficial to the recovery of patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the timing of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for acute pyogenic cholecystitis in the advanced age.Methods The clinical data for 56 advanced age patients with acute pyogenic cholecystitis in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery,the 900th Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of People's Liberation Army from January 2018 to February 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.There were 31 males and 25 females,aged from 70 to 86 years,with average age was (75.52±3.57) years.According to the percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage(PTGD) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) time interval,all patients were divided into three groups.Patients in the group A(n =12),B (n =21),and C (n =23) performed LC were within 2 months,during 2-4 months,and during 4-6 months,retrospectively.Observation indicators:(1) Surgical situations.The operation and postoperative basic condition of the three groups were compared.(2) Follow-up situations.Patients were followed-up by outpatient examination or telephone interview to detect the postoperative complication in the postoperative three months up to June 2019.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as (Mean ± SD),and comparison multiple groups was done using single factor analysis of variance (AVONA test),and comparison between groups was done using the t test,and comparison of multiple groups in pairs was done using the SNK-q test,and hierarchical data were analyzed using Kruskal-wallis H test.Count data were analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability.Results (1) Surgical situations:the thickness of gallbladder wall before LC,the rates of converting to laparotomy,the volume of intraoperative blood loss,the operation duration,and the duration of postoperative hospital stay were (0.57±:0.04) cm,50.0％,(95.83 ±11.45) ml,(107.50±21.90) min,(5.67±3.40) d in the group A,and (0.43 ±0.03) cm,9.5％,(69.52±24.59) ml,(71.43 ±12.16) min,(3.76±2.61) d in the group B,and (0.43 ± 0.05) cm,39.1％,(68.64 ±21.89) ml,(77.95 ±12.88) min,(5.05 ±2.95) d in the group C,respectively,showing significant differences in the above indicators between the three groups (P ＜ 0.05).The thickness of gallbladder wall before LC,the volume of intraoperative blood loss,the operation duration,those in group A were higher than the group B and C (P ＜0.05),and with no statistically significant different between the group B and C (P ＞ 0.05).The rates of converting to laparotomy,the duration of postoperative hospital stay in group B were better than the group A and C (P ＜ 0.05),and with no statistically significant different between the group A and C (P ＞0.05).The thickness of gallbladder wall before LC,the volume of intraoperative blood loss,the operation duration,and the duration of postoperative hospital stay were (0.43 ± 0.03) cm,(46.67 ± 9.82) ml,(67.69 ± 7.77) min,(2.64 ±0.58) d in the gallbladder wall thickness of successful LC patients,and (0.52±0.04) cm,(123.53 ±17.30) ml,(134.12±25.51) min,(8.47 ±0.80) d in the laparotomy patients,respectively,showing significant differences in the above indicators between the two groups (P ＜ 0.05).(2) Follow-up situations:56 patients were followed up and without perioperative death.No complications occurred after 3 months of follow-up.Conclusion Elective surgery that is performed in 2-4 months after PTGD for patients with acute pyogenic cholecystitis in the advanced age can reduce the volume of intraoperative blood loss and the rates of converting to laparotomy,shorten the operation duration and the duration of postoperative hospital stay,which is beneficial to the recovery of patients.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the clinical characteristics of severe acute pancreatitis(SAP)complicated withacute acalculous cholecystitis(AAC).METHODS: The clinical data of 141 SAP patients admitted in the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from September 2012 to August 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. Among them,39 SAP patients were complicated with AAC. The clinical characteristics and key points of diagnosis and treatment ofSAP complicated with AAC were analyzed and compared with the basic data and treatment of patients without AAC.RESULTS: The incidence of SAP complicated with AAC was 27.7%(39/141). Compared with the non-AAC group,theAAC group had statistically significant differences in age [(48.8±12.5)years vs.(41.4±10.9)years], Balthazar CTSIscore [(6.8±1.3)vs.(5.7±1.3)],diabetes mellitus(35.9% vs. 18.6%), fasting time [(16.9±9.5)h vs.(12.2±7.6)h],incidence of ARDS(74.3% vs. 54.9%)and ARF(43.6% vs. 23.5%),and length of hospital stay [(33.7±19.6)d vs.(21.9±12.9)d](P<0.05). In the AAC group,8 patients underwent conservative treatment. 31 patients underwent invasivetreatment for severe gallbladder inflammation,among them 20 patients received PTGD and their condition improved. Themortality rates of patients in the AAC group were also higher than that in the non-AAC group(20.5% vs. 8.8%),butthere was no statistical significance(P=0.106).CONCLUSION: The AAC is one of the common complications in the latecourses of SAP. Early diagnosis and individualized treatment are crucial to improve the curative effects. For the patients,the early use of PTGD is a safe and effectivetreatment method,which is worthy of promotion.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the application value of early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGD) in 65 years of age or older patients with severe acute cholecystitis.Methods The prospective study was conducted.The clinical data of 80 patients with severe acute cholecystitis who were admitted to Shanxi Dayi Hospital of Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences from May 2016 to January 2018 were collected.All patients were divided into two groups by random number table,including patients undergoing LC 72 h later after extubation of PTGD in the PTGD + early LC group,and patients undergoing LC 5-14 days later after extubation of PTGD in the PTGD + delayed LC group.Observation indicators:(1) surgical situations;(2) analysis of liver function before and after LC in the two groups;(3) analysis of serum-related inflammatory factors before and after LC in the two groups;(4) follow-up situations.Patients were followed up by outpatient examination or telephone interview to detect the postoperative complications in the postoperative three months up to April 2018.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean ± SD,and comparison between groups was done using the paired t test.Count data were represented as absolute number,and comparison between groups was analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability.Results Eighty patients were screened for eligibility,including 41 males and 39 females,aged from 65 to 70 years,with an average age of 67 years.There were 40 patients in the PTGD + early LC group and 40 in the PTGD + delayed LC group,respectively.(1) Surgical situations:the operation time,volume of intraoperative blood loss,and duration of postoperative hospital stay were (52± 15) minutes,(29± 11) mL,(18.9± 1.6) days in the PTGD + early LC group,and (88± 13)minutes,(69± 11)mL,(27.7±4.8)days in the PTGD + delayed LC group,respectively,showing significant differences in the above indicators between the two groups (t =11.668,16.219,11.000,P＜0.05).(2) Analysis of liver function before and after LC in the two groups:the levels of aspartate transaminase (AST),alanine aminotransferase (ALT),gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT),and total bilirubin (TBil) of PTGD + early LC group were (53 ± 11) U/L,(203 ±40) U/L,(128± 22) U/L,(19± 6)U/L,(86±21)μmol/L before LC,and (26±5)U/L,(83±23)U/L,(29±3)U/L,(11±5)U/L,(27± 7) μmol/L at 24 hours after LC,showing significant differences in the above indicators before and after LC (t =12.562,16.448,28.199,6.478,16.857,P＜0.05).The levels of AST,ALT,GGT,and TBil of PTGD + delayed LC group were (54± 12) U/L,(203±48) U/L,(130±24) U/L,(19±6) U/L,(85±20) μmol/L before LC,and (29±5) U/L,(151±36) U/L,(53±7)U/L,(17±3)U/L,(31±8)μmol/L at 24 hours after LC,showing significant differences in the above indicators before and after LC (t =13.622,5.481,2.169,1.988,15.855,P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in the levels of AST,ALT,ALP,GGT,TBil before LC between the two groups (t=0.389,0.000,0.389,0.000,0.218,P＞0.05),meanwhile,there were significant differences in the levels of AST,ALT,ALP,GGT,TBil after LC between the two groups (t =2.683,10.067,19.931,6.508,2.380,P＜0.05).(3) Analysis of serum-related inflammatory factors before and after LC in the two groups:the levels of interleukin-1 (IL-1),interleukin-6 (IL-6),high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP),interleukin-10 (IL-10),and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) of PTGD + early LC group were (71 ±9) ng/L,(82±9)ng/L,(137±16)ng/L,(75±6)ng/L,(67±9)μg,/L before LC,and (87±13)ng/L,(97±9)ng/L,(81± 19)ng/L,(145±6)ng/L,(85±6)μg/L at 24 hours after LC,showing significant differences in the above indicators before and after LC (t ==6.400,7.454,14.259,52.175,10.525,P＜0.05).The levels of IL-1,IL-6,high-sensitivity CRP,IL-10,and TNF-α of PTGD + delayed LC group were (71±9) ng/L,(82± 10) ng/L,(145±28)ng/L,(75±6)ng/L,(67±10) μg/L before LC,and (145±7)ng/L,(135±16) ng/L,(101±1S)ng/L,(146±9) ng/L,(113±10)μg/L at 24 hours after LC,showing significant differences in the above indicators before and after LC (t =41.079,17.766,8.360,41.525,27.578,P ＜ 0.05).There was no significant difference in the levels of IL-1,IL-6,high-sensitivity CRP,IL-10,and TNF-α before LC between the two groups (t =0.000,0.000,1.569,0.000,0.000,P＞0.05),meanwhile,there were significant differences in the levels of IL-1,IL-6,high-sensitivity CRP,and TNF-α after LC between the two groups (t=24.844,13.092,4.833,15.185,P＜0.05).(4) Follow-up situations:80 patients were followed up for 3 months.Two patients in the PTGD + early LC group had postoperative complications,including 1 of bile duct injury and 1 of incisional infection;9 patients of PTGD + delayed LC group had postoperative complications,including 3 of bile duct injury,3 of multiple organ failure,2 of incisional infection,1 of death.There was a significant difference in the postoperative complication between the two groups (x2 =5.165,P＜0.05).Conclusion Early LC after PTGD can effectively shorten operation time,reduce volume of intraoperative blood loss,shorten duration of postoperative hospital stay,protect liver function,reduce the expression of serum inflammatory factors at 24 hours after surgery,and reduce postoperative complications.
ABSTRACT
0bjective To compare laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)with or without percutane-ous transhepatic gallbladder drainage(PTGD)for acute severe ch01ecystitis.Methods According to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.23 articles were selected for this meta.analysis.A1l patients were treated with LC with or without PTGD.A meta-analysis was used to analyze the clinical efficacy.Results Compared with LC.a11 the surgical indicators of LC with PIGD were significantly better than LC alone(all P≤0.05),including the operation time:95％CI(-27.24,-9.27);intraoperative blood loss:95％CI(-50.25,-40.19);postoperative hospital stay:95％CI(-3.63,-O.64);rates of conversion to open abdomen:OR=0.48,95％CI(0.32.0.74);rates of incision infection:OR=0.49,95％CI(0.25,O.99);drainage tube indwelling time:95％CI(-2.07,-1.19);gastrointestinal function recovery time:95％CI(-1.73,-0.77);rates of bile leakage:OR=0.23,95％CI(0.12,0.44);and rates of compli-cations:OR=0.36.95％CI(0.27,0.48).Conclusion Compared with LC alone,PTGD+LC is the preferred treatment for acute severe cholecystitis.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the effect of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage(PTGBD) on different American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) grading of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis. Methods The 324 patients with acute cholecystitis undeigoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy who were hospitalized in Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Xianyang Central Hospital from March 2010 to December 2014 were enrolled in the retrospective analysis. According to the history of the patients with or without PTGBD before laparoscopic cholecystectomy, all patients were divided into 2 groups. One hundred and eighty four patients who underwent directly laparoscopic cholecystectomy were the control group, and the other 140 patients who underwent PTGBD + elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were the study group. The rates of conversion to laparotomy, total days of hospitalization, hospitalization days after cholecystectomy incidence, postoperative complications incidence, postoperative drainage were compared between two groups. The difference of clinical data between the two groups were compared under different ASA classification. Measurement data were expressed as ((x)±s) and t-test were used for comparison between groups. Count data were compared by X2 test. Results The rate of intraoperative laparotomy was 23.6％(33/140) in the study group and 20.7％(38/184) in the control group; the mean length of hospital stay was (7.3 ±3.3) days in the study group and (6.8 ±2.3) days in the control group; the postoperative complication rate was 2.8％(4/140) in the study group and 0.5％(1/184) in the control group; the abdominal cavity drainage rate was 80.0％(112/140) in the study group and 73.9％(136/184) in the control group; intraoperative laparotomy rate, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications incidence, and abdominal cavity drainage rate between the two groups had no significant difference(P> 0.05). The total length of hospital stay was(17.6 ±4.4) days in the study group and(10.6 ±3.0) days in the control group, and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups(P <0.001). According to the subgroup analysis by ASA classification, the two groups of ASA-I patients in the experimental group were significantly higher than the control group in the temperature, C reactive protein and the total number of days of hospitalization, and the difference was statistically significant(P< 0.05). The two groups of ASA-Ⅱ patients in the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group in age, white blood cell count, C reactive protein and total hospitalization days, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). In ASA-Ⅲ patients, the rate of intraoperative laparotomy was 28.3％ (13/46) in the study group and 32.1％ (9/28) in the control group; the mean hospital stay after surgery was(10.8 ± 3.7) days in the study group and(11.2±4.8) days in the control group; The total length of hospital stay was (19.7 ±7.2) days in the study group and (16.8 ± 8.6) days in the control group; the rate of intraoperative laparotomy, the mean length of hospital stay and postoperative hospital stay in the two groups of ASA-Ⅲ patients had no statistically significant difference(P>0.05). Conclusions PTGBD has different effects on laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with different ASA grading of acute cholecystitis. PTGBD combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and effective method that can turn emergent operation intoselective operation. It is worthy of extensive application.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the clinical value of percutaneous gallbladder drainage in the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis(SAP). Methods A total of 65 patients treated for SAP in our hospital between January 2014 and April 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into a gallbladder puncture group and a control group. Follow-up was performed for at least 6 months to monitor mortality and the incidence of complications, including pancreatic abscess, pseudocyst, renal failure, respiratory failure, heart failure, gastrointestinal bleeding, sepsis, and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), The differences in mortality and complication rates between the two groups were statistically analyzed. Results Mortality in the gallbladder puncture group was significantly lower than in the control group (P ＜ 0. 05); the incidence of renal failure, respiratory failure, heart failure, gastrointestinal bleeding, and sepsis in the gallbladder puncture group was lower than in the control group (P ＜ 0. 05); the incidence of pancreatic abscess and pseudocyst in the gallbladder puncture group was similar to that in the control group, showing no significant difference (P ＞ 0. 05); the incidence of DIC in the gallbladder puncture group was lower than in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P ＞ 0. 05). Conclusion Percutaneous gallbladder drainage can effectively reduce the incidence of renal failure, respiratory failure, heart failure, gastrointestinal bleeding, and sepsis in SAP, thereby reducing mortality. However, the incidence of DIC, pancreatic abscess, and pseudocyst is not reduced.
ABSTRACT
Objective To study the efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage (PTCD),percutaneous gallbladder drainage,and percutaneous transhepatic biliary stent implantation for the treatment of malignant obstructive jaundice in patients who are observed to fail endoscopic drainage. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 17 patients diagnosed with obstructive jaundice between August 2015 and July 2017 who were observed to have failed endoscopic drainage. Percutaneous puncture drainage had been performed in all patients-different methods were chosen based on the type of lesion and the patient's intraoperative condition. Among these patients, 9 underwent percutaneous transhepatic biliary stent implantation (53％),5 underwent PTCD (29％),and 3 underwent percutaneous gallbladder drainage (18％). The serum levels of total bilirubin (TBIL) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were assessed a day preoperatively and a week postoperatively. The postoperative decrease (or drop) in the serum TBIL and ALT levels was used as a parameter to assess the efficacy of treatment. Patients were divided into a stent and a tube group. The therapeutic effects were compared between the groups in terms of the drop in the serum TBIL and ALT levels and the survival time of patients. Results The postoperative serum TBIL and ALT levels were significantly decreased in all patients (P < 0. 05). No statistically significant difference was observed between the stent and the tube group in terms of the decrease in serum TBIL and ALT levels (P > 0. 05). However,a statistically significant difference was observed between the stent and the tube group in terms of the survival time of patients (P < 0. 05). Conclusion Percutaneous puncture is an effective treatment modality to manage malignant obstructive jaundice in patients who fail endoscopic drainage. Compared to tube drainage,stent placement can prolong patient survival time. Regarding the decrease in serum TBIL and ALT levels,we conclude that stent implantation is not significantly better than tube drainage.
ABSTRACT
Objective To study the effects of different intervention time of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder catheterizing drainage (PTGBD)on severe acute biliary pancreatitis Methods Totally 64 patients with severe acute biliary pancreatitis in Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University from July 2013 to July 2017were selected and divided into 3 groups according to the time from attack to PTGBD:group A (less than 72 hours,n =28),group B (from 72 hours to 120 hours,n =22),group C (from 120 hours to 148 hours,n =14).Intergroup comparison of level of WBC,CRP,TBIL,PLT and APACHE-Ⅱ Score,disappearance time of abdominal sign,incidence of pancreatic abscess,length of stay (LOS),mortality and patient satisfaction 48 hours before and after PTGBD were conducted.Results Compared with those in group B and C,all laboratory indexes,APACHE-ⅡScore,disappearance time of abdominal sign,incidence of pancreatic abscess,LOS,mortality and patient satisfaction in group A were all significantly different (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion Early PTGBD (within 72 hours)can be effective and safe for the treatment of severe acute biliary pancreatitis,and can shorten LOS and reduce the mortality.
ABSTRACT
The gold standard for treatment of acute cholecystitis is laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, cholecystectomy is often not suitable for surgically unfit patients who are too frail due to various co-morbidities. As such, several less invasive endoscopic treatment modalities have been developed to control sepsis, either as a definitive treatment or as a temporizing modality until the patient is stable enough to undergo cholecystectomy at a later stage. Recent developments in endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) with endoscopic ultrasound EUS-specific stents having lumen-apposing properties have demonstrated potential as a definitive treatment modality. Furthermore, advanced gallbladder procedures can be performed using the stents as a portal. With similar effectiveness as percutaneous transhepatic cholecystostomy and lower rates of adverse events reported in some studies, EUS-GBD has opened exciting possibilities in becoming the next best alternative in treating acute cholecystitis in surgically unfit patients. The aim of this review article is to provide a summary of the various methods of gallbladder drainage GBD with particular focus on EUS-GBD and the many new prospects it allows.
Subject(s)
Humans , Cholecystectomy , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Cholecystitis, Acute , Cholecystostomy , Drainage , Gallbladder , Sepsis , Stents , UltrasonographyABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage ( EUS-GBD) for patients with acute cholecystitis, who are unfit for cholecystectomy. Methods Patients who underwent EUS-GBD at Hangzhou First People′s Hospital from April 2015 to December 2016 were enrolled in this study. Clinical data were collected, and effectiveness and complications were analyzed. Results EUS-GBD was achieved in all 5 patients, and the mean procedure time of EUS-GBD was 26. 0±3. 1 min. Double pigtail plastic stents were successfully placed in 4 patients. A nasobiliary drainage tube was placed in 1 patient and the tube was endoscopically cut 5 days after procedure acting as internal drainage. All patients recovered without complications and no procedure-related death occurred. During the follow-up period (46-692 d), no patient experienced recurrent cholecystitis and stent migration. Conclusion At an experienced endoscopic center, EUS-GBD is a safe, effective and minimally invasive method for patients with acute cholecystitis and high surgical risk.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the clinical characteristics of acute calculous cholecystitis in over 80 years old patients.Methods A retrospective study was made on the clinical data of 71 cases diagnosed as acute calculous cholecystitis and receiving surgical treatment from Sep 2006 to Sep 2016.Patients were divided into three groups:Early LC group (25 patients),PTGD group (29 patients),the staged LC group (17 patients) after PTGD.Results There was statistically significant difference in the gallbladder wall thickness,operation time and blood loss between the two LC groups.There was no statistically significant difference between the two LC groups in other baseline data and hospital stay,hospital cost,rate of postoperational complication,rate of conversion to open procedure between the two LC groups.There was statistically significant difference between the early LC group and PTGD group in the baseline data.Logistic regression analysis indicated that the TG13 grade was an important influence factor for treatment selection of PTGD (OR=3.957,P=0.015,95％CI:1.30-12.043).Conclusion Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was safe for good risk over 80 years old patients.For poor risk patients,PTGD is recommended before a LC attempt.