ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the feasibility of applying an ArcCHECK detector to the dose verification for ultra-long target volumes of cervical cancer.Methods:This study retrospectively selected patients suffering from cervical cancer with ultra-long target volumes (lengths: ≥ 26 cm; 50 cases; the ultra-long target volume group) and conventional target volumes (lengths: < 26 cm; 50 cases; the conventional target volume group). Subsequently, this study designed treatment plans using the Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) technique and then collected and verified doses using an ArcCHECK detector. The dose detection for the conventional target volume group was performed at the central point of the detector (marked by iso and Short-0 cm). Then, the detector was moved for 5 cm along the bed exit direction (marked by iso 1), followed by the dose verification of the ultra-long target volume group (marked by Long-5 cm) and conventional target volume group (marked by Short-5 cm). The geometric parameters (the length and volume of a target volume), mechanical parameters (machine hop count and the duration of irradiation), and gamma pass rates (GPRs) under different detection conditions of each group were analyzed.Results:The target lengths, target volumes, machine hop counts, and irradiation durations of the ultra-long target group were higher than those of the conventional target group ( t = 2.61-18.56, P < 0.05). For the conventional target group, the GPRs at iso 1 were significantly lower than those at iso ( t = 2.14-8.17, P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the GPRs at iso 1 of the ultra-long target volume group were significantly lower than those of the conventional target volume group ( t = -4.70 to -2.73, P < 0.01). The GPRs of each group met clinical requirements for criteria of both 3%/3 mm and 3%/2 mm. Conclusions:The deviation of the positioning center and the length of the target volume serve as primary factors affecting the dose verification result of cervical cancer. For ultra-long target volumes, dose verification can be performed by moving the positioning center, thus ensuring treatment accuracy for cervical cancer patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the feasibility of a classification prediction model for gamma pass rates (GPRs) under different intensity-modulated radiation therapy techniques for pelvic tumors using a radiomics-based machine learning approach, and compare the classification performance of four integrated tree models.Methods:With a retrospective collection of 409 plans using different IMRT techniques, the three-dimensional dose validation results were adopted based on modality measurements, with a GPR criterion of 3%/2 mm and 10% dose threshold. Then prediction were built models by extracting radiomics features based on dose documentation. Four machine learning algorithms were used, namely random forest (RF), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM). Their classification performance was evaluated by calculating sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and AUC value. Results:The RF, AdaBoost, XGBoost, and LightGBM models had sensitivities of 0.96, 0.82, 0.93, and 0.89, specificities of 0.38, 0.54, 0.62, and 0.62, F1 scores of 0.86, 0.81, 0.88, and 0.86, and AUC values of 0.81, 0.77, 0.85, and 0.83, respectively. XGBoost model showed the highest sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and AUC value, outperforming the other three models. Conclusions:To build a GPR classification prediction model using a radiomics-based machine learning approach is feasible for plans using different intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques for pelvic tumors, providing a basis for future multi-institutional collaborative research on GPR prediction.
ABSTRACT
Objective:Based on radiomics characteristics, different machine learning classification models are constructed to predict the gamma pass rate of dose verification in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for pelvic tumors, and to explore the best prediction model.Methods:The results of three-dimensional dose verification based on phantom measurement were retrospectively analyzed in 196 patients with pelvic tumor intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans. The gamma pass rate standard was 3%/2 mm and 10% dose threshold. Prediction models were constructed by extracting radiomic features based on dose documentation. Four machine learning algorithms, random forest, support vector machine, adaptive boosting, and gradient boosting decision tree were used to calculate the AUC value, sensitivity, and specificity respectively. The classification performance of the four prediction models was evaluated.Results:The sensitivity and specificity of the random forest, support vector machine, adaptive boosting, and gradient boosting decision tree models were 0.93, 0.85, 0.93, 0.96, 0.38, 0.69, 0.46, and 0.46, respectively. The AUC values were 0.81 and 0.82 for the random forest and adaptive boosting models, respectively, and 0.87 for the support vector machine and gradient boosting decision tree models.Conclusions:Machine learning method based on radiomics can be used to construct a prediction model of gamma pass rate for specific dosimetric verification of pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The classification performance of the support vector machine model and gradient boosting decision tree model is better than that of the random forest model and adaptive boosting model.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To study the feasibility of using pelvic iterative cone beam CT images for dose calculation of radiation therapy planning, so as to provide support for adaptive radiotherapy.Methods:The CIRS 062 M phantom was scanned by Varian Halcyon v2.0 o-ring accelerator, and the average CT number under different scattering conditions was calculated, and then the ICBCT-ED conversion curve was established. CT images of CIRS 002PRA pelvic IMRT phantom and ICBCT images at different positions were collected. Treatment plan using VMAT technique based on CT image was designed and transplanted into ICBCT image with dose recalculated. The differences of gamma passing rate among target volume, organs at risk and 3-dimensional dose were compared. Based on the actual treatment plan of patients, the differences of 3-dimensional dose gamma passing rate in 10 pelvic patients were analyzed retrospectively.Results:There was a large CT value deviation at central position between the isolated no-scattering condition and the full-scattering condition, and the maximum deviation was 144 HU. The CT values of other positions in full-scattering condition were similar to those of the central position, and the maximum deviation was less than 50 HU. Based on the calculated result of ICBCT images at different positions of the pelvic phantom, the dose deviation of the target volume or organs at risk was less than 1 Gy. Compared with the plan based on CT images, the average 3-dimensional dose gamma passing rate under the criteria of 1% dose difference (DD)/1 mm distance-to-agreement (DTA) and 2% DD/2 mm DTA in plan based on ICBCT images were (88.86 ±1.18)% and (98.38±0.89)%, respectively. The ranges of average 3-dimensional dose gamma passing rate under the criteria of 2% DD/2 mm DTA and 3% DD/3 mm DTA in 10 patients with pelvic tumors were 90.03%-95.43% and 93.58%-97.78%, respectively, and the worst result was only 85.90% and 92.90%, respectively. The main reason of the worst result was the dose difference caused by large variation of bladder contour due to over-filling.Conclusions:Under comprehensive scattering conditions, the ICBCT-ED conversion curve is reconstructed and the treatment plan can be designed by using the ICBCT image of Halcyon v2.0 linear accelerator. The accuracy meets the standards of clinical application, which provides assurance for adaptive radiotherapy in the future.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the dose calculation accuracy of two algorithms in Monaco TPS for self-made phantoms with different cavity thickness, and analyze the influence of phantoms with different cavity thickness on dose verification of upper esophageal cancer. Methods The phantoms with different cavity thickness were placed on the simulated CT positioning machine to scan and acquire images. In Monaco TPS, the irradiation fields with energy of 6 MV, 100 MU and different square field sizes were added to the acquired images. The dose of the cavity of the ionization chamber was calculated by two algorithms, and measured on the accelerator by dosimeter under the same conditions. At the same time, 20 patients with upper esophageal cancer who received dynamic intensity modulation in fixed field were randomly selected and included in the study, and two algorithms were used for dose verification on phantoms with different cavity thickness. The results were statistically analyzed by SPSS 22.0 software. Results The maximum deviations between the calculated values and the measured values were 0.66% and −1.8%, in the calculation of phantoms with different cavity thickness by algorithms of Monte Carlo and Pencil Beam. In Monte Carlo algorithm, the result of RD pair t test is P > 0.05. Paired t test of AD (0 mm, 10 mm), (5 mm, 10 mm) and (10 mm, 20 mm) groups showed no significant difference (P < 0.05). The maximum deviation was 1.1%, and the rest groups were not statisticely significant (P > 0.05); In Pencil Beam algorithm the t test results of RD (0 mm, 20 mm) and (5 mm, 20 mm) pairs were (P < 0.05), the maximum deviation was 0.58%, and the rest groups were (P > 0.05). In AD group, (P < 0.05), the maximum deviation was 2.78%; The paired t test between the two algorithms was (P < 0.05), and the maximum deviations in RD and AD groups were 2.49% and 4.14%, respectively. Conclusion Monte Carlo algorithm has accurate calculation and high gamma pass rate of dose verification, and there is no clinical difference in gamma pass rate of dose verification among phantoms with different cavity thickness, pencil Beam algorithm is not recommended in cavity phantom calculation.
ABSTRACT
Objective To study the iso-center point coincidence of two accelerators with treatment planning system (TPS) based on γ passing rates of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan verification.Methods Twenty-one IMRT plans were verified by Varian accelerator and twenty by Elekta accelerator with a gamma criterion of 3 mm/3％.The passing rates were measured when the iso-center point of TPS had-2,-1,0,1,and 2 mm shift in the x or y direction.A binomial curve of γwas fit to figure out the values of the two accelerators on the x and y axes when γ value reached the maximum.The γ pass rate difference was analysed by x2 test.Results The mean values of γ-2,γ-1,γ0,γ1,and γ2 in the x direction were (92.56±3.27) ％,(96.53± 1.82) ％,(96.13± 1.41) ％,(90.14± 2.87) ％,and (82.28± 4.69) ％ for Varian accelerator,and (94.82± 2.04) ％,(97.05± 2.02) ％,(98.38± 1.33) ％,(97.96± 1.44) ％,and (94.49±2.34)％ for Elekta accelerator.There was no significant difference in the mean value of γ0between the two accelerators (P=0.332).When γvalue reached the maximum,the values on the x and y axes were0.65 and-0.30 mm for Varian accelerator and 0.01 and 0.30 mm for Elekta accelerator,respectively.Conclusions In the same TPS,different accelerators have different degrees of coincidence of the actual field center point with the iso-center point of TPS,to which more attention should be paid in clinical practice.
ABSTRACT
Objective To analyze the impact of dose calculation resolution on Gamma pass rate for planar dose distribution verification of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT),and to find out the appropriate calculation resolution value with specific applied criteria.Methods 25 IMRT plans were selected for the planar dose verification.The Gamma pass rates with 3 mm/3％,2 mm/2％ and 1 mm/1％ criteria were compared and analyzed.The planar dose distributions were calculatedand exported from TPS with different resolutions of 0.5,1,2,3,4 and 5 mm.The pass rates of Gamma analysis between the computed dose distributions with different resolutions and the dose distributions measured by Mapcheck device were compared and analyzed.Results The average Gamma pass rates of all the 225 fields decreased with the increment of calculation resolution.When the pass rates of Gamma analysis were calculated using 3 mm/3％ criteria,the gamma pass rate with 1 mm and 0.5 mm calculation resolution were (98.3±1.3)％ and (98.3±1.2)％,respectively.The results were almost the same and the difference wasn't statistically significant (P＞0.05).The gamma pass rates with greater than or equal to3 mm calculation resolution were significantly less than the pass rate with 0.5 mm calculation resolution (P＜0.05).When the pass rates of Gamma analysis were calculated using 2 mm/2％ criteria,all the pass rates with greater than 0.5 mm calculation resolution were significantly less than the pass rate with 0.5 mm calculation resolution (P＜0.05).Conclusions The Gamma pass rates of planar dose verification reduce significantly with the increment of calculation resolution.In order to reduce the effect of calculation resolution on Gamma pass rate,the lower calculation resolution should be used.When using the 3 mm/3％ criteria for the Gamma analysis,1 mm calculation resolution is recommended.When using the 2 mn/2％ criteria for the Gamma analysis,0.5 mm calculation resolution is recommended.The appropriate calculation resolution will ensure the reliability of planar dose verification.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To inspect the dosimetry characteristic of a 2-D ionization chamber array and its response to oblique incident electron beam.And to discuss feasibility to using it to validate the electron arc therapy plan.Materials and methods:(1)The 2-D ionization chamber array was calibrated referring to a themble chamber,comparing the response to electron beams with incidence angle ranged from-50°to 50°.(2)Phantom test plans of 6 and 10MeV electron beam arc therapy were designed,with the beam rotation arcs of 30°,60°and 90° respectively,symmetric to the Central axis of 0°gantry angle.Dose distribution of each plan was verifled with the 2-D array.Results:(1)Measurement differences between the central detector of the array and the thimble chamber were less than 2%,under the planned oblique inddent 6/10MeV electron beam.(2)For the all test plans,dose error was less than 3%at dmax in the symmetric axis of the electron beam arcs.Off-axis dose error was less than 2%within the central 70%area of the profile in non-rotating direction,and smaller than 1.5%in the rotational direction.The measured dose distribution had good agreement with the TPS calculation in isodose curves between 100%and 20%.The gammapass rates(△D=5%,△d=5cm)were 99.98%、99.89%、99.74%、98.64%、99.16%and 99.44%respectively for 6 and 10 MeV plans with electron beam arcs of 30°,60°and 90°.Conclusion:it is practicable using the tested 2-D ionization chamber array to verify and validate the electron beam arc therapy plan.