ABSTRACT
Objective:To establish a nomogram based on features under endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for predicting the diagnosis of small gastric stromal tumors.Methods:The clinicopathological data of 189 patients with gastric submucosal tumors (diameter less than 2 cm) who underwent endoscopic resection at the Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University from June 2015 to August 2021 were retrospectively collected. All patients were divided into the modeling group ( n=126) and the validation group ( n=63) at 2∶1 by random function of software R. Independent influencing factors for the diagnosis of small gastric stromal tumors under EUS screened by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to establish the diagnostic prediction nomogram. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to evaluate the discrimination of the model both in the modeling group and the validation group. Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration curve were used to evaluate the calibration of the model in both groups. Results:The age of patients >60 years ( OR=2.815, 95% CI:1.148-6.900, P=0.024), the lesions located in cardia/fundus ( OR=5.210, 95% CI:1.225-22.165, P=0.025), originated in muscularis propria ( OR=6.404, 95% CI:2.262-18.135, P<0.001) and of external growth ( OR=6.024, 95% CI:1.252-28.971, P=0.025) were independent influencing factors for the diagnosis of small gastric stromal tumors under EUS. The diagnostic prediction nomogram was established based on the four factors above. The areas under ROC curve of the modeling group and validation group were 0.834 (95% CI:0.765-0.903) and 0.780 (95% CI:0.667-0.893). Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated that this model fit the data well ( χ2=10.23, P=0.176 in the modeling group; χ2=2.62, P=0.918 in the validation group). Calibration charts of the model drawn by Bootstrap method showed that the calibration curves fit well with the standard curves in both groups. Conclusion:The nomogram based on features under EUS for predicting the diagnosis of small gastric stromal tumors provides a visual reference for endoscopists to diagnose small gastric stromal tumors under EUS with good discrimination and calibration.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the safety and long-term efficacy of endoscopic resection of gastric stromal tumors with a diameter of >2-4 cm.Methods:The clinical data of 307 patients, who underwent endoscopic or surgical resection and pathologically confirmed to be gastric stromal tumors with a diameter ≤4 cm in Fujian Provincial Hospital, Jinshan Branch of Fujian Provincial Hospital or Fujian Geriatric Hospital from January 2014 to December 2019, were collected. The propensity score matching (1∶1) was performed for the cases with the tumor size of >2-4 cm.Then the incidence of adverse events related to the operation and clinical outcomes were compared between 41 patients in the endoscopic group and 41 patients in the surgical group.Results:Compared with the surgical group, the median operation time in the endoscopic group was significantly shorter (58.0 min VS 108.0 min, Z=-4.789, P<0.001), and the median hospitalization cost was significantly lower (22.7 thousand yuan VS 42.0 thousand yuan, Z=-7.164, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in postoperative fasting time or postoperative hospitalization time between the two groups ( P>0.05). Complications occurred in 7 cases (17.1%) in the endoscopy group, including 5 cases of postoperative acute infection, 1 case of postoperative perforation, and 1 case of postoperative bleeding; all 9 cases (22.0%) in the surgical group developed postoperative acute infection. There was no significant difference in the overall incidence of complications between the two groups ( χ2=0.311, P=0.577). Tumors in both groups were completely removed with negative resection margins. The follow-up time of the endoscopy group was 34.3±15.6 months, and that of the surgical group was 42.2±20.2 months. No recurrence or distant metastasis was observed during the follow-up period in the two groups. Conclusion:Endoscopic resection of large gastric stromal tumor (range>2-4 cm) is safe and effective in the long term, which can be used as one of the methods for gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the feasibility and safety of endoscopic treatment for gastric stromal tumors with maximum diameter of 3 to 5 cm. Methods From April 2010 to April 2016, a retrospective analysis was performed on the data of patients with gastric stromal tumors undergoing endoscopic (29 cases)or laparoscopic(26 cases)resection in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. Baseline data, perioperative data and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. Results There was significant difference on tumor location between the two groups(χ2=12.173, P=0.007). Tumors mainly located at gastric fundus in the endoscopic group(65.5%,19/29),while at gastric body in the laparoscopic group(61.5%, 16/26). Compared with the laparoscopic group, patients in the endoscopic group had shorter operation time[45(35, 60)min VS 70(60, 85)min, U = 686.000, P<0.05], lesser intraoperative blood loss[15(10,15)mL VS 20(10, 20)mL, U=513.000, P=0.017], and earlier recovery time of gastrointestinal function[12(6, 24)h VS 20(18, 24)h, U=585.500, P<0.001]. Compared with the laparoscopic group, the patients in the endoscopic group had a higher complication rate[55.2%(16/29)VS 11.5%(3/26), χ2=11.543, P<0.001]and a lower intact tumor removal rate [89.7%(26/29)VS 100.0%(26/26),χ2=23.989,P<0.001]. The other perioperative parameters such as the incidence of intraoperative major bleeding, postoperative peritonitis, postoperative fasting time, hospitalization time and total hospitalization expenses showed no statistical different(all P>0.05). The postoperative follow-up time was 30.0(17.5,50.0)and 38.5(26.0,49.8)months in the endoscopic and laparoscopic group,respectively. There was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the two group[3.4%(1/29)VS 7.7%(2/26),χ2=0.009,P=0.922]. Conclusion Endoscopic resection may be an alternative therapeutic approach for large gastric stromal tumors with shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss,and earlier recovery time of gastrointestinal function.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the expression of CD133 and CD44 proteins in gastric stromal tumors (GST) and their clinical significances. Methods The expression of CD44 and CD133 proteins in the GST tissues of 112 patients was detected by immunohistochemical staining. The relation between the expression of CD44 and CD133 proteins and the clinicopathological characters was analyzed. The survival and prognosis of GST were also analyzed. Results Both CD44 and CD133 were expressed on the cell membranes. The expression rates of CD44 and CD133 were 58.04 % (65/112) and 42.86 % (48/112) separately; the co-expression rate of CD44 and CD133 was 27.68 % (31/112). CD44 and CD133 were negative in normal peritumoral tissues. No correlation was found between CD44 and CD133 and the clinicopathological parameters including gender, age and lymphatic vessel invasion (all P>0.05), but the expression levels of CD44 and CD133 in patients with the mitotic count ≥ 5/50 high-power field, large diameter and vascular invasion were significantly higher (all P0.05), but the co-expression level of CD44 and CD133 in patients with tumor diameter ≥5 cm was significantly higher than that in patients with tumor diameter < 5 cm (χ2=5.040, P=0.025). The overall survival rate of the patients with co-expression of CD44 and CD133 was shorter than that in other groups (χ2 = 8.758, P= 0.001). No correlation was found between CD44 and CD133 expression (r=0.126, P=0.210). Multivariate analysis with the Cox regression models showed that the tumor diameter ≥5 cm (P=0.042) and co-expression of CD44 and CD133 (P=0.003) were significantly associated with poor prognosis. Conclusion CD44 and CD133 as robust cancer stem cell markers in GST might be the prognostic factors.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the operative approaches of gastric stromal tumor,and to evaluate the treatment effect of various operation methods. Methods The clinical and pathological data of 96 cases of gastric stromal tumor treated in People's Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from Jan 2011 to Jun 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. 16 cases got laparoscopic resection, 48 cases got gastroscope and laparoscopic combined resection, and 42 cases got open resection. Results For patients with tumor diameter 0.05). For patients with tumor diameter > 5 cm, the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization days, postoperative complications, and postoperative metastasis of mortality in the laparoscopic group didn't have the advantage compared with the laparotomy group (P > 0.05). Conclusion Different diameter of gastric stromal tumor should adopt different surgical methods and ways, the indication is strict, otherwise easy to cause tumor residual or disseminated planting.
ABSTRACT
Objective To improve detectable rate of gastric schwannoma by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Method Clinical data and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) imaging features of 4 cases were retrospectively ana-lyzed which diagnosed as gastric schwannoma pathologically and immunohistochemically while diagnosed as gastric stromal tumor by EUS from May 2008 to June 2015 and reviewed the literature. Results 4 cases of gastric schwan-nomas are female and benign, all 4 lesions are solitary, 3 in gastric body, and 1 in fundus by endoscopic. By EUS, all lesions are originated from muscularis propria, hypoechoic change, even echoes and clear board without calcifica-tion or cystic changes. 2 cases have halo artifacts around the lesion. Literature review found that gastric schwannoma tended to occur in female, halo artifacts could be the feature of gastric schwannoma, calcification or cystic changes were rare in gastric schwannoma which were common in gastric stromal tumors. Conclusion It was difficult to distin-guish gastric schwannoma and gastric stromal tumors that originated from muscularis propria by EUS. For female patients with lesions originated from muscularis propria, originated from muscularis propria and occurred in gastric body, it was necessary to observe lesions whether there was being calcification or cystic and halo artifacts. Integrated all these performance, we should be in consideration of gastric stromal tumors, meanwhile, excluding the possibility of gastric schwannoma.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the clinical diagnosis of gastric stromal tumors and the safety and feasibility with laparoscopic wedge resection.Methods The clinical data of diagnosis and treatment were retrospectively analyzed in 43 cases diagnosed as gastric stromal tumors by endoscopyic ultrasonography.Results Thirty-six cases were successful by laparoscopic surgery success rate being 83.7%.Endoscopic ultrasonography diagnosis rate was 69.0%.The positive rate of CD117 and CD34 in postoperative diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor wasl00%.The mean post-operative hospital stay was 5 days.Conclusion Endoscopyic ultrasonography can be selected as a main method for clinical diagnosis of gastric stromal tumors and laparoscopic resection was safe and feasible.
ABSTRACT
Objective To assess CT diagnostic value of gastric stromal tumor (GST). Methods Clinical data and spiral CT findings of 20 patients with pathologically proven GST were analyzed retrospectively. Results Twenty lesions were solitary in plain CT scan image. The malignant lesions (n=9) were larger than 5.0 cm in diameter and cystic degenerations as well as necrosis were detected within the tumors, while the underlying malignant lesions (n=11) were smaller than 5.0 cm in diameter and most of them showed homogeneous density. Calcification was detected in 2 patients. On enhanced CT scan, the substantial part of the lesions was obviously strengthened. Multiplanar reformation displayed the relationship of tumor and stomach clearly. Conclusion The CT imaging features of gastric stromal tumor are characteristic. Plain CT scan and multiplanar reformation are helpful to determine the location and nature of gastric stromal tumors.
ABSTRACT
Objective To study on the endoscopic, pathologic and immunohistochemical characteristics of gastric stromal tumor. Methods The gastric tumor samples were studied with light microscopy, and in those suspected of mesenchymal tumor the expression of CD11734, CD34 , vimentin, desmin, S-100 etc. were further determined with SP method. The clinical, pathological and endoscopic characteristics were reviewed. Results Twenty-eight cases of mesenchymal cell tumor were diagnosed as stromal tumor and enrolled in this study, with 9 benign, 11 borderline, and 8 malignant cases. Endoscopically, the gastric stromal tumors showed submucosal protuberant lesions, and were situated in fundus (15 cases), body (10 cases) and an-trum (3 cases). Deep concave ulcer presented on tumor surface in 10 patients. Histology revealed the typical stromal tumor features with cell in spindle and/or epithelia shape and arranged in fence-like or spiral forms. All cases were positive for CD117 CD34 , vimentin when assessed, but 28 cases were negative for desmin and 22 cases (18. 2% ) for S-100. Conclusion The gastric stromal tumors were the most common mesenchymal tumors. Microscopically, the tumors were composed of spindle or epithelioid cells. CD117 and CD34 can be used as immune markers to diagnose gastric stromal tumor.