ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To explore the clinical efficacy differences of scalp acupuncture on brain injury in premature infants with different months of age.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>According to the corrected months of age, 90 cases of premature infants with brain injury were divided into a group A (3 through 6 corrected months of age), a group B (7 through 9 corrected months of age) and group C (10 through 12 corrected months of age), 30 patients in each one. Based on the conventional early intervention, the infants in the group A were treated with scalp acupuncture at , motor area; the infants in the group B were treated with scalp acupuncture at , motor area and foot motor sensory area; the infants in the group C were treated with scalp acupuncture at , motor area, foot motor sensory area and balance area. All the treatment was given once every other day, and totally 30 treatments were given. The Alberta infant motor scale (AIMS), development quotient (DQ) of each function indexes in Gesell developmental scale (GDS) were observed before and after treatment; the clinical efficacy of each group was compared and the correlation between clinical efficacy and months of age was analyzed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Compared before treatment, the total score of AIMS and DQ of each function indexes of GDS were all improved in the three groups after treatment (all <0.01). After treatment, the differences of total score of AIMS and DQ of each function indexes of GDS among the three groups were significant (<0.05, <0.01), and the results in the group A were higher than those in the group B and the group C (<0.05, <0.01). The total effective rate was 96.3% (26/27) in the group A, which was higher than 89.7% (26/29) in the group B and 83.3% (25/30) in the group C. The correlation analysis indicated less months of age was significantly corelated with better efficacy (<0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Scalp acupuncture has superior improvement on the recovery of brain damage in premature infants, especially for those with 6 months of age or less.</p>
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate if Carroll Upper Extremities Functional Test (UEFT) is a better rating scale for evaluating fine mo-tor function in children with cerebral palsy. Methods From January, 2011 to January, 2014, 104 children with cerebral palsy were divided in-to non-hemiplegic palsy group (n=76) and hemiplegic palsy group (n=28), they were assessed by two certified valuers in one week. Their fine motor function was evaluated with UEFT and the Gesell Developmental Scale. The scores of UEFT were compared respectively with the developmental age (DA) and developmental quotient (DQ) in fine motor domain of Gesell Developmental Scale. At the same time, the UEFT score of the affected limb was compared with of the unaffected limb in children with hemiplegic palsy. Results In the non-hemiplegic palsy group, the UEFT score strongly correlated with DA (r=0.752, P0.05). The UEFT score of unaffected limb was significantly higher than that of the affected limb (Z=-4.708, P<0.001). Conclusion Both of UEFT and the Ge-sell Developmental Scale could be used clinically in assessment of fine motor function in children with cerebral palsy. The UEFT was better in evaluating children with hemiplegic palsy.
ABSTRACT
@#Objective To analyze the relationship between intelligence development and clinical types and high-risk factors in the children with cerebral palsy (CP).Methods 363 CP children were tested using Gesell Developmental Scale (GDS), the relationship between intelligence development delay and clinical types and high-risk factors was analyzed.Results There was a significant relation between asyphxia, pathologic jaundice and intelligence development delay of CP children. The rate of intelligence development delay in athetotic and mixed type CP was significantly higher than the spastic type ( P<0.01).Conclusion Asyphxia and pathologic jaundice are the high-risk factors inducing intelligence development delay, and there is a relationship between intelligence development delay and clinical type of CP.