Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Clinics ; 73: e480, 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-952800

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Unfavorable predicted adult height and psychosocial inadequacy represent parameters used to guide therapeutic intervention in girls with central precocious puberty. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog is the first-line treatment. The aim of this study was to compare two methods used to predict adult height and assess a validated tool for predicting the age at menarche in girls with central precocious puberty. METHODS: The predicted adult height of 48 girls with central precocious puberty was calculated at diagnosis using the Bayley-Pinneau method based on average and advanced bone age tables and compared with the predicted adult height calculated using a mathematical model. In addition, the age at spontaneous menarche was predicted using the new formulae. After Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog treatment, the predicted adult height was calculated using only the Bayley-Pinneau tables. RESULTS: The achieved adult height was within the target height range in all treated girls with central precocious puberty. At diagnosis, the predicted adult height using the Bayley-Pinneau tables was lower than that using the mathematical model. After the Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog treatment, the predicted adult height using the Bayley-Pinneau method with the average bone age tables was the closest to the achieved adult height. Using the formulae, the predicted age at spontaneous menarche was 10.1±0.5 yr. The Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog treatment significantly postponed this event until 11.9±0.7 yr in these "idiopathic" central precocious puberty girls, highlighting the beneficial effect of this treatment. CONCLUSION: Both initial adult height prediction methods are limited and must be used with caution. The prediction of the age at spontaneous menarche represents an innovative tool that can help in clinical decisions regarding pubertal suppression.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Child, Preschool , Child , Puberty, Precocious/drug therapy , Body Height/physiology , Menarche/physiology , Models, Statistical , Reference Values , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/analogs & derivatives , Age Factors , Statistics, Nonparametric
2.
Arch. endocrinol. metab. (Online) ; 60(2): 163-172, Apr. 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-782162

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Clinical and laboratory diagnosis and treatment of central precocious puberty (CPP) remain challenging due to lack of standardization. The aim of this revision was to address the diagnostic and therapeutic features of CPP in Brazil based on relevant international literature and availability of the existing therapies in the country. The diagnosis of CPP is based mainly on clinical and biochemical parameters, and a period of follow-up is desirable to define the “progressive” form of sexual precocity. This occurs due to the broad spectrum of pubertal development, including isolated premature thelarche, constitutional growth and puberty acceleration, progressive and nonprogressive CPP, and early puberty. Measurement of basal and stimulated LH levels remains challenging, considering that the levels are not always in the pubertal range at baseline, short-acting GnRH is not readily available in Brazil, and the cutoff values differ according to the laboratory assay. When CPP is suspected but basal LH values are at prepubertal range, a stimulation test with short-acting or long-acting monthly GnRH is a diagnostic option. In Brazil, the treatment of choice for progressive CPP and early puberty is a long-acting GnRH analog (GnRHa) administered once a month or every 3 months. In Brazil, formulations of GnRHa (leuprorelin and triptorelin) are available and commonly administered, including 1-month depot leuprorelin 3.75 mg and 7.5 mg, 1-month depot triptorelin 3.75 mg, and 3-month depot leuprorelin 11.25 mg. Monthly or 3-month depot GnRHa are effective and safe to treat CPP. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2016;60(2):163-72.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Puberty, Precocious/diagnosis , Puberty, Precocious/drug therapy , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/therapeutic use , Hormone Replacement Therapy/methods , Brazil , Luteinizing Hormone/blood , Sex Factors , Anthropometry , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/analogs & derivatives , Age Factors
3.
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Medical Sciences) ; (6): 535-542, 2011.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-248629

ABSTRACT

The debate exists whether or not gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs used in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) impair endometrial receptivity.Homeobox A11 (Hoxall),Meis homeobox 1 (Meisl),cadherin 1 (Cdhl),and catenin beta 1 (Ctnnbl) are well known to be involved in successful implantation.In this study,the endometrial expression of Hoxall,Meisl,Cdhl,and Ctnnbl during the peri-implantation period was investigated in an in vitro fertilization (IVF) mouse model by real-time RT-PCR and Western blot to evaluate the relationship between Hoxall,Meisl,Cdhl,and Ctnnbl expression and the impact of the COH on endometrial receptivity.The mimic COH protocols included GnRH agonist plus human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) (GnRH agonist group),GnRH antagonist plus HMG (GnRH antagonist group),and HMG alone (HMG group).The expression levels of Hoxall,Meisl,Cdhl,and Ctnnbl mRNA and protein were decreased in all of the COH groups.The expression levels of Hoxall and Ctnnbl were the lowest in the GnRH agonist group,and those of Meisl and Cdbl were lower in the GnRH analog groups than the HMG group.There were positive correlations between the expression of Hoxall and Ctnnbl,as well as the expression of Meisl and Cdhl among all the groups.In conclusion,the COH protocols,particularly with GnRH analogs,suppressed Hoxall,Meisl,Ctnnbl and Cdhl expression,in mouse endometrium during the peri-implantation period.Our data reveal a novel molecular mechanism by which the COH protocols might impair endometrial receptivity.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL