The effectiveness and safety of cranial nerve block in migraine: a critical review / A eficácia e segurança do bloqueio de nervos cranianos na enxaqueca: uma revisão crítica

Cranial nerve blocks (CNBs) have been used for the acute and preventive treatment of a variety of headaches, including migraine. The effectiveness of CNBs in migraine is usually observed beyond the duration of the nerve block, possibly due to central pain modulation. The most used target is the greater occipital nerve. Other commonly targeted nerves are the lesser occipital nerve and various branches of the trigeminal nerve, including the supratrochlear, supraorbital, and auriculotemporal nerves. CNBs are generally safe and well-tolerated procedures that can be performed in either emergency or outpatient settings. There is currently no guideline standardizing CNBs in migraine. In clinical practice, as well as the few published studies, the results are encouraging, justifying further studies in the area. In the present study we critically review the literature about the safety and efficacy of CNBs in the treatment of migraine attacks and in the preventive treatment of migraine.

Bloqueios de nervos cranianos (BNCs) têm sido usados ​​para o tratamento agudo e preventivo de uma variedade de dores de cabeça, incluindo enxaqueca. A eficácia dos BNC na enxaqueca é geralmente observada além da duração do bloqueio nervoso, possivelmente devido à modulação central da dor. O alvo mais utilizado é o nervo occipital maior. Outros nervos comumente alvo são o nervo occipital menor e vários ramos do nervo trigêmeo, incluindo os nervos supratroclear, supraorbital e auriculotemporal. Os CNBs são geralmente procedimentos seguros e bem tolerados que podem ser realizados em ambientes de emergência ou ambulatoriais. Atualmente não há nenhuma diretriz padronizando BNCs na enxaqueca. Na prática clínica, assim como nos poucos estudos publicados, os resultados são animadores, justificando novos estudos na área. No presente estudo revisamos criticamente a literatura sobre a segurança e eficácia dos BNC no tratamento de crises de enxaqueca e no tratamento preventivo da enxaqueca.

New approaches and therapeutic options for post-dural puncture headache treatment / Nuevos abordajes y alternativas terapéuticas en el tratamiento de la cefalea pospunción dural

Abstract Post-dural puncture headache is a frequent complication in neuraxial approaches. It may result in disability, healthcare dissatisfaction and potentially serious complications. The traditional initial management includes general and analgesia measures with poor evidence. The treatment approach best supported by the literature is the epidural blood patch for which rates of up 70% improvement have been reported. Regional techniques have been recently described that may be helpful because they are less invasive than the epidural blood patch, under certain clinical circumstances. This article suggests an algorithm that uses such techniques for the management of this complication.

Resumen La cefalea pospunción dural es una complicación frecuente del abordaje del neuroeje. Puede producir incapacidad, insatisfacción con la atención en salud y complicaciones potencialmente graves. Tradicionalmente su manejo inicial incluye medidas generales y de analgesia las cuales tienen baja evidencia. La medida para su tratamiento, con mejor soporte en la literatura, es la realización de parche hemático, el cual informa tazas de mejoría hasta del 70 %. Recientemente se han descrito técnicas regionales, que pueden resultar útiles por ser menos invasivas que el parche hemático, en ciertos contextos clínicos. En este artículo se propone un algoritmo que permite incorporar dichas técnicas al manejo de esta complicación.

Ultrasound-guided greater occipital nerve block with botulinum toxin for patients with chronic headache in the occipital area: a randomized controlled trial / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided greater occipital nerve (GON) block has been frequently used to treat various types of headaches, and botulinum toxin has recently begun to be used in patients with headache. Our study presents the long-term effect of botulinum toxin on GON block using ultrasound in patients with chronic headache in occipital area. METHODS: Patients with occipital headache were divided into two groups (bupivacaine: BUP group [n = 27], botulinum toxin: BTX group [n = 27]), and ultrasound-guided GON block was performed at the C2 level. GON was detected with ultrasound and distance from GON to midline, from the skin surface to GON, and size of GON were measured in both groups. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and Likert scale were assessed at pretreatment and at 1, 4, 8, and 24 weeks after treatment in both groups. RESULTS: The distance from GON to midline was 18.9 ± 4.4 mm (right) and 17.3 ± 3.8 mm (left). The depth from the skin was 12.9 ± 1.5 mm (right) and 13.4 ± 1.6 mm (left). GON size was 3.1 mm on both sides. The VAS score and patient satisfaction score (Likert scale) in 4, 8, and 24 weeks after injection were superior for the BTX than the BUP group. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided GON block using BTX is effective in reducing short-term and long-term pain in patients with chronic headache in the occipital area.

Ultrasound-Guided Greater Occipital Nerve Block for Primary Headache: Comparison of Two Techniques by Anatomical Injection Site

OBJECTIVE: Greater occipital nerve block (GONB) is a widely accepted treatment of primary headaches. Two ultrasound (US)-guided blockade techniques exist: 1) the classical distal nerve block technique performed medial to the occipital artery at the superior nuchal line, and 2) the new proximal nerve block technique performed at the obliquus capitis inferior muscle at the level of C2. Our study aim was to perform a head-to-head comparative study of these two US-guided techniques.METHOD: Forty-nine patients with primary headache treated in our university hospital were recruited. Patients were randomized into two groups of the classical nerve block and the new proximal nerve block techniques. The headache questionnaire was made to assess the intensity of the pain of headache attacks, number of days they experience headache, duration of headache, and amount of pain medication they consumed.RESULTS: In both groups, a decrease in the severity and frequency of the headache was observed. There was no measurable difference in outcome between the two groups.CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the classic and new proximal techniques are equally effective in decreasing the headache severity and frequency.

Efficacy of bilateral greater occipital nerve block in postdural puncture headache: a narrative review

The Epidural blood patch is considered the gold standard for managing postdural puncture headache when supportive measures fail. However, it is a procedure which can lead to another inadvertent dural puncture. Other potential adverse events that could occur during a blood patch are meningitis, neurological deficits, and unconsciousness. The bilateral greater occipital nerve block has been used for treating chronic headaches in patients with PDPH with a single injection. This minimally invasive, simple procedure can be considered for patients early, along with other supportive treatment, and an epidural blood patch can be avoided.

Neuralgia occipital: relato de caso e revisão / Occipital Neuralgia: Case Report and Review

Neuralgia occipital (NO) é uma causa incomum de cefaleia caracterizada por dor paroxística, do tipo pontada, que se irradia para a região occipital. O objetivo deste artigo é relatar o caso de uma paciente com NO e descrever a técnica cirúrgica utilizada. O estudo compreende um levantamento bibliográfico para o conhecimento e melhor abordagem sobre o assunto. Com base na literatura, observa-se que a etiologia pode variar desde traumas, infecções, cirurgias de base de crânio, compressões de nervos ou vértebras até alterações degenerativas e anomalias congênitas. Porém, em sua maioria, os casos são idiopáticos. Apesar de o diagnóstico ser essencialmente clínico, é fundamental que sejam excluídos outros tipos de cefaleias primárias. De acordo com a gravidade e o tempo de evolução do caso, o tratamento da NO pode basear-se em bloqueios nervosos, medicamentos ­ como anti-inflamatórios não-esteroides e relaxantes musculares ­ ou cirurgias. Entre os procedimentos cirúrgicos disponíveis, encontram-se a descompressão do nervo occipital maior, ablação por radiofrequência e implantação de neuroestimulador.

Occipital Neuralgia (ON) is an uncommon cause of headache, characterized by paroxysmal pain, stabbing that radiates to occipital region. This article aims at reviewing the literature to the approach to the subject and performs the case report of patient who present with ON and underwent a surgical treatment. Based on the literature and analysis showed the etiologymay vary from trauma, infections, skull base surgery, compression of nerves or vertebrae to degenerative changes and congenital anomalies. However, most cases are idiopathic. Although the diagnosis is essentially clinical, it is essential that other types of primary headaches are excluded. According to severity and the time course of the case, the treatment of ON may be based on nerve blocks, medications like non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and muscle relaxants. Surgical treatment for ON are nerve decompression, pulsed radiofrequency ablation and stimulator implantation.

Neuralgias of the Head: Occipital Neuralgia

Occipital neuralgia is defined by the International Headache Society as paroxysmal shooting or stabbing pain in the dermatomes of the greater or lesser occipital nerve. Various treatment methods exist, from medical treatment to open surgical procedures. Local injection with corticosteroid can improve symptoms, though generally only temporarily. More invasive procedures can be considered for cases that do not respond adequately to medical therapies or repeated injections. Radiofrequency lesioning of the greater occipital nerve can relieve symptoms, but there is a tendency for the pain to recur during follow-up. There also remains a substantial group of intractable patients that do not benefit from local injections and conventional procedures. Moreover, treatment of occipital neuralgia is sometimes challenging. More invasive procedures, such as C2 gangliotomy, C2 ganglionectomy, C2 to C3 rhizotomy, C2 to C3 root decompression, neurectomy, and neurolysis with or without sectioning of the inferior oblique muscle, are now rarely performed for medically refractory patients. Recently, a few reports have described positive results following peripheral nerve stimulation of the greater or lesser occipital nerve. Although this procedure is less invasive, the significance of the results is hampered by the small sample size and the lack of long-term data. Clinicians should always remember that destructive procedures carry grave risks: once an anatomic structure is destroyed, it cannot be easily recovered, if at all, and with any destructive procedure there is always the risk of the development of painful neuroma or causalgia, conditions that may be even harder to control than the original complaint.

Sensory Complications in Patients after Scalp Mass Excision and Its Anatomical Considerations

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of postsurgical sensory complications in patients with scalp masses and classify the locations of them from a surgical standpoint according to anatomical considerations. METHODS: A total of 121 patients who underwent surgery for scalp mass were included in this study. The authors reviewed medical records and preoperative radiologic images. We investigated the complications related to sensory changes after procedure. Enrolled patients have been divided into three groups. Group A included patients with tumors above the superior nuchal line (SNL), Group B with tumors within the trapezius muscle area and patients who had tumors on the lateral trapezius muscle area were assigned to Group C. We compared the incidence related to postoperative sensory complications and summarized their additional treatments for these with clinical outcome. RESULTS: There were 12 patients (10%) with sensory complications related on the mass excision site (Group A: 1 patient, Group B: 2 patients, Group C: 9 patients). Six patients were affected with lesser occipital nerve (LON), 2 patients on greater occipital nerve (GON) and 4 patients on GON and LON. Over 6 months after surgery, two of the twelve patients with sensory complications did not have complete recovered pain in spite of proper medications and local chemical neurolysis with 1.0% lidocaine and dexamethasone. CONCLUSION: Occipital neuropathy should be considered as a complication related excision of scalp mass. The sensory complications are more frequent in Group C because of the anatomical characteristics of the occipital nerves and there were no statistical difference for other variables.

Intractable Occipital Neuralgia Caused by an Entrapment in the Semispinalis Capitis

Occipital neuralgia is a rare pain syndrome characterized by periodic lancinating pain involving the occipital nerve complex. We present a unique case of entrapment of the greater occipital nerve (GON) within the semispinalis capitis, which was thought to be the cause of occipital neuralgia. A 66-year-old woman with refractory left occipital neuralgia revealed an abnormally low-loop of the left posterior inferior cerebellar artery on the magnetic resonance imaging, suggesting possible vascular compression of the upper cervical roots. During exploration, however, the GON was found to be entrapped at the perforation site of the semispinalis capitis. There was no other compression of the GON or of C1 and C2 dorsal roots in their intracranial course. Postoperatively, the patient experienced almost complete relief of typical neuralgic pain. Although occipital neuralgia has been reported to occur by stretching of the GON by inferior oblique muscle or C1-C2 arthrosis, peripheral compression in the transmuscular course of the GON in the semispinalis capitis as a cause of refractory occipital neuralgia has not been reported and this should be considered when assessing surgical options for refractory occipital neuralgia.

Alopecia After Occipital Nerve Blockade

Occipital nerve blockade is a widely used procedure in the treatment of primary and secondary headache disorders. The procedure is generally well tolerated, although local side effects such as cutaneous atrophy, hyperpigmentation, and alopecia can occur. The present study describes a case of alopecia following occipital nerve blockade with triamcinolone. This complication can be avoided by precautions such as local injection and the use of alternative steroid preparations.

Alopecia After Occipital Nerve Blockade

Occipital nerve blockade is a widely used procedure in the treatment of primary and secondary headache disorders. The procedure is generally well tolerated, although local side effects such as cutaneous atrophy, hyperpigmentation, and alopecia can occur. The present study describes a case of alopecia following occipital nerve blockade with triamcinolone. This complication can be avoided by precautions such as local injection and the use of alternative steroid preparations.

Ultrasound-guided greater occipital nerve block for patients with occipital headache and short term follow up / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: The greater occipital nerve (GON) block has been frequently used for different types of headache, but performed with rough estimates of anatomic landmarks. Our study presents the values of the anatomic parameters and estimates the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided GON blockade. METHODS: The GON was detected using ultrasound technique and distance from external occipital protuberance (EOP) to GON, from GON to occipital artery and depth from skin to GON was measured in volunteers. Patients with occipital headache were divided into two groups (ultrasound-guided block: group S, conventional blind block: group B) and GON block was performed. The same parameters were measured on group S and VAS scores were assessed at pretreatment, 1 week and 4 weeks after treatment on both groups. RESULTS: The GON had distance of 23.1 +/- 3.4 mm (right) and 20.5 +/- 2.8 mm (left) from EOP to GON. Its depth below the skin was 6.8 +/- 1.5 mm (right) and 7.0 +/- 1.3 mm (left). The distance from GON to occipital artery was 1.5 +/- 0.6 mm (right) and 1.2 +/- 0.6 mm (left) in volunteers. Initial VAS score of group S and group B patients were 6.4 +/- 0.2 and 6.5 +/- 0.2. VAS score of 4 weeks after injection were 2.3 +/- 0.2 on group S and 3.8 +/- 0.3 on group B (P = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: The parameters measured in this study should be useful for GON block and ultrasound-guided blockade is likely to be a more effective technique than blind blockade in occipital headache treatment.

Fluoroscopy and Sonographic Guided Injection of Obliquus Capitis Inferior Muscle in an Intractable Occipital Neuralgia

Occipital neuralgia is a form of headache that involves the posterior occiput in the greater or lesser occipital nerve distribution. Pain can be severe and persistent with conservative treatment. We present a case of intractable occipital neuralgia that conventional therapeutic modalities failed to ameliorate. We speculate that, in this case, the cause of headache could be the greater occipital nerve entrapment by the obliquus capitis inferior muscle. After steroid and local anesthetic injection into obliquus capitis inferior muscles under fluoroscopic and sonographic guidance, the visual analogue scale was decreased from 9-10/10 to 1-2/10 for 2-3 weeks. The patient eventually got both greater occipital neurectomy and partial resection of obliquus capitis inferior muscles due to the short term effect of the injection. The successful steroid and local anesthetic injection for this occipital neuralgia shows that the refractory headache was caused by entrapment of greater occipital nerves by obliquus capitis inferior muscles.

Anatomical study of greater occipital nerve entrapment syndrome / 中国综合临床

ObjecUve To provide anatomical basis for diagnosis and therapeutic methods for treating grea-ter occipital nerve entrapment syndrome.Methods With 10 multiples microscope,the trace,distribution,compres-sion and relationship with occipital vessel of greater occipital nerve were observed and measured on 60 specimens of adult corpse.With a vernier caliper the distance of the easily compressed part of greater occipital nerve with external occipital protuberance,mastoidal and superior nuchal line were measured,and the superficial projeetion of the easily compressed part was marked.Results The course of the nerve could be divided into two parts:active part and inac-tive part.The former laid in the nuchal muscles,the latter ran and anchored to superficial fascia of the scalp,and easily compressed,accompanying with occipital vessel.This point lay in medial to occipital vessel and lateral to ex-ternal occipital protuberance(27.60±5.20)mm,and inferior to superior nuchal line(18.46±5.12) mm,and the superficial projection lay in median and superior 1/3 of the line from external occipital protuberance to mastoid apex. Conclusion Treating the greater occipital nerve compression syndrome by closed operation,the best position for needling lays in a bit inferior to point of median and superior 1/3 of the line from external occipital protuberance to mastoid apex.During the operation we should loose the main trunk compression of the greater occipital nerve as well as the branches compression on it.

Effect of Greater Occipital Nerve Block on the Posterior Headache and Neck Pain after Total Thyroidectomy / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: During thyroidectomy, the patient's neck is fully extended for good surgical exposure. After thyroidectomy, patients usually complain of posterior headache and posterior neck pain. It has been known that the greater occipital nerve block is a means of effective medical treatment for occipital headache and posterior neck pain. Therefore, we examined the effects of a greater occipital nerve block on postthyroidectomy headache and neck pain. METHODS: This study was randomized and double-blinded. After anesthesia induction, patients were administered greater occipital nerve block by the same anesthesiologist; 0.25% bupivacaine 5 ml was used for each greater occipital nerve block. Patients in the control group did not receive a greater occipital nerve block. After thyroidectomy, another anesthesiologist evaluated patients' headaches and neck pains at 4, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively by using a VAS. RESULTS: Forty four patients were included. The number of patients in the control and the block group were 27 and 17, respectively. VAS scores of occipital headache after 4, 12, and 24 hours in the control group were 3.52+/-2.75, 3.67+/-2.75, and 2.95+/-1.96, respectively. VAS scores of occipital headache after 4, 12, and 24 hours in the block group were 0.05+/-0.65, 0.50+/-0.85, and 0.43+/-0.64, respectively. VAS scores of posterior neck pain after 4, 12, and 24 hours in the control group were 4.09+/-2.79, 3.81+/-2.60, and 3.00+/-2.02. VAS scores of posterior neck pain after 4, 12, and 24 hours in the block group were 1.29+/-2.20, 1.00+/-1.66, and 0.79+/-1.25, respectively. The pain experienced by the block group was significantly lower than that of the control group. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that greater occipital nerve block is an effective modality for reducing post-thyroidectomy headache and posterior neck pain.